SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
But without God, abiogenesis is impossible.Without living things, there is no evolution.
There are living things.
Period.
And since there are living things, God must have created them.
End proof.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But without God, abiogenesis is impossible.Without living things, there is no evolution.
There are living things.
Period.
What makes you say that? We don't know how life came from non-life, but the odds are that it was a perfectly natural occurance.But without God, abiogenesis is impossible.
You still do not know what a logical argument is either. I reject your premises. Try again.But without God, abiogenesis is impossible.
And since there are living things, God must have created them.
End proof.
But prana existed before god.But without God, abiogenesis is impossible.
No; there are some who believe the cell may have always existed.I think everyone agrees that living things didn't exist until they did. It's the sort of statement that wins a prize for being obvious.
I have never met any such person. How would such a person explain cells existing in the singularity at the beginning of the Big Bang?No; there are some who believe the cell may have always existed.
Very good! Ok I amend that...on the earth living things did not exist until they did exist.I think everyone agrees that living things didn't exist until they did. It's the sort of statement that wins a prize for being obvious.
Really?No; there are some who believe the cell may have always existed.
There's an old song called "Anything Goes..."I have never met any such person. How would such a person explain cells existing in the singularity at the beginning of the Big Bang?
Kind of like Stephen Hawkins assertion that something came from nothing. No proof, no nothing.I think everyone agrees that living things didn't exist until they did. It's the sort of statement that wins a prize for being obvious.
Well, we have no idea if life exists on other planets or not. Given the size of the universe, the mathematical probability is that there is life elsewhere. But so far, we have not encountered it.Very good! Ok I amend that...on the earth living things did not exist until they did exist.
True. It drives me nuts the absolutely ridiculous things that people will believe.There's an old song called "Anything Goes..."
I'm not an expert on the Big Bang, but I know that those who ARE experts agree that there was a time before matter came into existence.Kind of like Stephen Hawkins assertion that something came from nothing. No proof, no nothing.
Prove this. The science suggests otherwise. So what wonderful data do you have that shows it wrong?But without God, abiogenesis is impossible.
Bad assumptions make the argument fail.And since there are living things, God must have created them.
End proof.
The same way Stephen Hawkins figured the universe came from nothing. Why not?I have never met any such person. How would such a person explain cells existing in the singularity at the beginning of the Big Bang?
Bad assumptions? You mean about abiogenesis? And about what was the first living thing on the earth? Or you mean that without God life wouldn't be on the earth?Prove this. The science suggests otherwise. So what wonderful data do you have that shows it wrong?
Bad assumptions make the argument fail.
Who? There were no cells before carbon was formed in the first stars. There were no cells on earth until it cooled enough for liquid water.No; there are some who believe the cell may have always existed.
So they existed on earth first. Can you prove this?Very good! Ok I amend that...on the earth living things did not exist until they did exist.
So the first stars formed carbon. Is that what you mean? The rest I won't even go into.Who? There were no cells before carbon was formed in the first stars. There were no cells on earth until it cooled enough for liquid water.
I think you did not understand. So I will rephrase the question.So they existed on earth first. Can you prove this?