Right now according to certain scientific evidences, some conclusions are made, but as science improves, and new evidences are found the conclusions might be different and better, to the point that some of the conclusions that are considered true in our time, might be considered wrong at that point, and be replace with a correct one in future.
I didn't say that the analogy of human in the womb proves evolution. I said when we evolve in the womb from something like a warm to a complete human, at all the time we are human, even though we do not like human in the womb. The point is that human on the earth has gone through evolution from one shape to another shape gradually, until what it looks like today, but at all the time it could have been a distinct specie. There is nothing in science to prove this to be wrong. Is there? I understand that this is not what is concluded right now, but not everything that is concluded is the absolute truth. The history has shown that how many times scientists taught a particular theory is the absolute truth, while some time later, it was yet replaced by a better and more correct/complete theory.
Also, the analogy I used was from Baha'i scriptures written over 100 years ago. i can quote if you want.
Evolution is both a scientific FACT and a scientific THEORY. The scientific THEORY of evolution is based on billions of facts.
From the National Academies of science.
Is Evolution a Theory or a Fact?
It is both. But that answer requires looking more deeply at the meanings of the words "theory" and "fact."
In everyday usage, "theory" often refers to a hunch or a speculation. When people say, "I have a theory about why that happened," they are often drawing a conclusion based on fragmentary or inconclusive evidence.
The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence.
Many scientific theories are so well-established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics). Like these other foundational scientific theories, the theory of evolution is supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident that the basic components of the theory will not be overturned by new evidence. However, like all scientific theories, the theory of evolution is subject to continuing refinement as new areas of science emerge or as new technologies enable observations and experiments that were not possible previously.
One of the most useful properties of scientific theories is that they can be used to make predictions about natural events or phenomena that have not yet been observed. For example, the theory of gravitation predicted the behavior of objects on the moon and other planets long before the activities of spacecraft and astronauts confirmed them. The evolutionary biologists who discovered Tiktaalik predicted that they would find fossils intermediate between fish and limbed terrestrial animals in sediments that were about 375 million years old. Their discovery confirmed the prediction made on the basis of evolutionary theory. In turn, confirmation of a prediction increases confidence in that theory.
In science, a "fact" typically refers to an observation, measurement, or other form of evidence that can be expected to occur the same way under similar circumstances.
However, scientists also use the term "fact" to refer to a scientific explanation that has been tested and confirmed so many times that there is no longer a compelling reason to keep testing it or looking for additional examples. In that respect, the past and continuing occurrence of evolution is a scientific fact. Because the evidence supporting it is so strong, scientists no longer question whether biological evolution has occurred and is continuing to occur. Instead, they investigate the mechanisms of evolution, how rapidly evolution can take place, and related questions.
Evolution Resources from the National Academies
" I said when we evolve in the womb from something like a warm to a complete human, at all the time we are human, even though we do not like human in the womb."
Yes, because "at all the time we are human" genetic DNA code. That is why something other then human isn't born.
If not it would be a different DNA sequence and you would get different stages and hence looks.
"a joint statement of IAP by 68 national and international science academies lists as established scientific fact that Earth is approximately 4.6 billion years old and has undergone continual change;
that life, according to the evidence of earliest fossils, appeared on Earth at least 3.8 billion years ago and has subsequently taken many forms, all of which continue to evolve; and that the genetic code of all organisms living today, including humans, clearly indicates their common primordial origin"
It the history and timeline of the Planet itself and life and evolution, modern humans have not been here long at all.
