FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
It's such a strange idea that God would be quiet for millennia, and then suddenly finally make himself obvious and available, but only those who believed without evidence for all that time before are valid to enter God's kingdom. It's a very a--h--- move. Why is it so important to God that we believe in him, right now, without evidence? And on top of that, there's a bunch of arguments done that we are supposed to take as evidence for God. So which is it? Is God leaving obvious and clear evidence for his existence (like throwing a great party and tell us that he exists and makes it obvious to everyone) or is he not (and it all depends on faith)? It's a very mixed message here. If God is leaving us evidence for his existence, then that evidence is currently very poor. He could do a better job. But if it all depends on that we believe without having sufficient evidence and when God shows himself seeing-and-believing suddenly doesn't matter (only blind faith), then why would God supposedly leave any evidence at all? Can't he be clear about this? Faith without evidence--then there shouldn't be anything and we shouldn't argue if there is any, or Faith with evidence--then there should be abundant and extremely clear (God should come make the sun come up from the West right now).
The last sign which is the sunrise from the west isn't made as to be an evidence but it is the sign of the last hour which will be accompanied with horrific events and all will believe but Repentance won't be accepted.
There are many signs,but disbelievers refuse them all,saying that one was coincidence,the other was a lie or not a clear sign ...and so on and so forth.
Last edited: