You attack my thoughts but let's hear yours. What solutions do you see as viable? I'm going to wager it has to do with government programs am I right? Is there ANY onus on the people?
Fair comment. The answer will involve government to be sure. I again point to Europe as an example of what can happen when governments use their considerable clout to provide for the poor. Consider France or Sweden as examples. Although not perfect countries, nobody ever has to worry about getting sick. If they become unemployed, there are transition programs to keep you afloat while you're looking for new work and a comprehensive strategy for retraining and education. Yes, they have higher taxes than in the United States, but they don't have to pay for HMOs, so really, it's a wash. And they get better outcomes.
In England, you pay about ten bucks for prescription meds, no matter what the meds!
Some countries provide free university education.
Some countries have a comprehensive social housing policy including targets for building. As a result, such countries as Holland and Sweden have almost no homeless people.
And, contrary to what right-wing nutjobs in North America think, these countries are not socialist wastelands. They consistently outperform the United States per capita in terms of productivity and corporate R&D.
In Switzerland, companies make sure employees are highly trained and educated. This goes to their corporate culture, although I'm sure there must be some government involvement somewhere. But in any case, the workers there receive constant professional development and technical training.
Such initiatives provide an environment where such things as hard work and taking responsibility (your mantra) will actually do some good.
Please don't ever take a position of leadership over young people.
Too late! I teach them interdependence, not lone-rangerism. I teach them that they are in fact their brother's keeper. I don't teach them that those who can't make it are somehow irresponsible, stupid, retarded, or otherwise deficient. Why? Because it's not my place to judge. Instead, I teach people to look out for each other, which is a far cry better than feeding the myth that hard work always pays off. Hard work, for most people, simply doesn't pay off.
And before you say so, I'm not arguing that people shouldn't work hard and live responsibly. I'm pointing out that hard work and responsibility are not sufficient to make your way out of poverty. Inevitably, it's a team effort to alleviate poverty.
Public health clinics? You mean clinics they don't have to pay for? I thought there wasn't any help out there!
I didn't say that. I said there wasn't enough.
If you can't mail an evelope [assuming a functioning body] you are INCOMPETENT. Tom Whittaker, an amputee, almost climbed the entire height of Mt. Everest and this guy can't mail a ****ing letter?
It's not about physical ability. It's about whether the person could afford the time and effort at the time. Once again, you simply assume the worst of the person. I don't think he's a saint; I'm simply not going to judge him without further ado. And my experience working with and living among the poor has taught me that, by and large, they are among the most ingenious, industrious, and creative people you'd ever meet. Yet they are still poor. That leads me to think that, even granting there's something wrong with them and the way they run their lives, there is something amiss in our culture, and we need to take action on a cultural level.