Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
*Starts singing*Response: There's the statement. Where's the proof? Prove that muslims have to judge the results.
*Starts singing*
"....Here we go 'round the Mulberry bush, the Mulberry bush, the Mulberry bush..."
Response: *Finish singing*
"Here we go 'round the Mulberry bush so early in the morning".
Actually its " cold and frosty morning" but it was perhaps subject to some editing
Response: I thought I remember Barney and friends saying it that way. Guess I'll just stick to Sesame Street as usual.
Could I offer something as possibly passing the challenge? Why does/doesn't this pass the said challenge:
Could I offer something as possibly passing the challenge? Why does/doesn't this pass the said challenge:
To say that Indigenous peoples of the Americas migrated in 600 B.C is a great errorBook of Mormon "In Arabic as you wish" said:في عام 600 قبل الميلاد هاجر مجموعة من أسباط إسرائيل من القدس تحت قيادة الرسول لحي إلى القارة الأمريكية، وهذه المجموعة انقسمت بعد وصولها إلى قسمين الأول: واسمهم لامانيين نسوا تعاليم ديانتهم وعقائدهم مع الزمن، وصاروا في النهاية ما يعرف باسم الهنود الحمر. والقسم الثاني: واسمهم نافييس وهؤلاء احتفظوا بعقائدهم وأقاموا مدنًا وحضارة كبيرة، لكن الفريق الأول قام بتدمير حضارة القسم الثاني وإبادتها حوالي عام 400 قبل الميلاد. لكن القسم الثاني استطاع أن يكتب ويسجل عقائده وحضارته على ألواح ذهبية وقام بإخفائها؛ وذلك بمعرفة رسول يُسمى مورمون، ثم قام ابنه وروني بدفن هذه الألواح حوالي 1400 عام حتى أسلمها لجوزيف سميث، وهذه القصة وإن كان بعض المورمون لا يوافقون عليها ويعتقدون أن جوزيف سميث هو كاتب الكتاب المقدس بنفسه وليس نقلاً عن ألواح، لكن الأمر في النهاية لا يعني إلا أن هذا الكتاب عندهم مقدس ومكمل للتوراة.
See also: Models of migration to the New World, Classification of indigenous peoples of the Americas, Solutrean hypothesis, Kennewick Man, and Pre-Siberian American Aborigines
Scholars who follow the Bering Strait theory agree that most indigenous peoples of the Americas descended from people who probably migrated from Siberia across the Bering Strait, anywhere between 9,000 and 50,000 years ago. The time frame and exact routes are still matters of debate, and the model faces continuous challenges. A 2006 study (to be published in Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology[when?]) reports new DNA-based research that links DNA retrieved from a 10,000-year-old fossilized tooth from an Alaskan island with specific coastal tribes in Tierra del Fuego, Ecuador, Mexico, and California.[4] Unique DNA markers found in the fossilized tooth were found only in these specific coastal tribes, and were not comparable to markers found in any other indigenous peoples in the Americas. This finding lends substantial credence to a migration theory that at least one set of early peoples moved south along the west coast of the Americas in boats. However, these results may be ambiguous, as there are other issues with DNA research and biological and cultural affiliation.[5]
First. The Noble Quran says if you doubt this Quran is God's the produce a sura like it,if you think Quran is human made, then show us a human that can produce a Quran like not what you claim is a messanger, by showing us any book that you believe to be from God and claim it's like Quran to meet the challenge,then you mean that Quran is also from God .
Most important:Your Book of Marmon is nothing like the Holy Quran I'll give one reason
It "has" great errors that can't be god's
To say that Indigenous peoples of the Americas migrated in 600 B.C is a great error
Indigenous peoples of the Americas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
:biglaugh::biglaugh:,What are you talking about 600 B.C ?! :biglaugh:now that's impossibleI don't think it can be shrugged off this easily. Sure, we don't have any hard proof that people migrated to somewhere in the Americas around 600 B.C. But it is near impossible to prove that they didn't.
So what if Noble Qur'an has an Arabic word of none-Arabic origin,They were used before the Qur'an and they became Part of Arabic.
Example: I'll send to you a message in English and only English"
"Don't drink alcohol for it's harmful"
"Don't drink alma'a-alnjesa for it's harmful"
Alcohol and alma'a-alnjesa are both Arabic.But you will accept "alcohol" as an English word though it's An Arabic loanword in English,and not "alma'a-alnjesa" because it isn't an English word it's only Arabic.
Similarly Allah send a book in Arabic only, and since Arabic has an Arabic word from none-Arabic origin understood by speakers and considered part of the language they also will be used.
Will Anyone in the World who wants to write a book in english aim to avoid the Arabic loanwords in English ?(passed in the Muslims rule of europe)
The list is found here List of Arabic loanwords in English - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The answer is no,simply because these word became part of english and understood by the speakers.Syiran,Hebrew,parsian,Ethiopian,Arabic however are sister languages and share close genetic classification,Another thing that pointing nouns of books and people (None-Arab) that Allah sent is meaningless,Allah sent thousands of None- Arabic Messangers who have "none-Arabic names and books" and Allah told us about some of them and there names. Listen.. Point out a word in Qur'an that doesn't exist in Arabic, just like "alma'a-alnjesa" doesn't exist in English.
:biglaugh::biglaugh:,What are you talking about 600 B.C ?! :biglaugh:now that's impossible
Saying that it is near impossible to prove that they didn't.is totally wrong and proved 100% wrong.