• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Debate of God.

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Come now godnotgod, scripture from all religions use allegory, metaphor, simile, parable, figure of speech, analogy, etc.,...the reality is forever on the other side of these rhetorical devices which are used as an expedient to 'point the way',..it is up to the disciple as to apprehend or not.

Btw, digressing, here is a little mystical saying that is not easily apprehended by most..

If you die before you die, when you die you do not die!

To make sense of it,...!st you refers to ego, 2nd and 3rd you refers to the mortal body, and the 4th you is the Self realized soul.
 

godnotgod

Thou art That
Come now godnotgod, scripture from all religions use allegory, metaphor, simile, parable, figure of speech, analogy, etc.,...the reality is forever on the other side of these rhetorical devices which are used as an expedient to 'point the way',..it is up to the disciple as to apprehend or not.

Fine, as long as they are not taken literally....

Unfortunately.....
 
Last edited:

Gui10

Active Member
Well please tell who or what is the infallible source that defined this flawless definition of the unknowable God?

You are correct that the word "god" is used widely, but you know what,...there wouldn't be two people in existence whose conceptual interpretation of any definition of the reality that the word "God"is meant to represent that is exactly the same.

Yes but the problem we have with debating is that we put the word ''god'' in our sentences as if it were an clear and simple object. Its the use of the ''word'' ''god'' that bothers me, not what people conceptualize it as.

From what I understand, the question that this thread poses and debates is: ''Does god exist?''

In this manner, how can we argue if ''god'' exists if none of us are talking about the same ''god''? Know what I mean?
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
In this manner, how can we argue if ''god'' exists if none of us are talking about the same ''god''? Know what I mean?
You are saying the same thing, when people talk about 'god', they generally have a personal mental concept of what it actually represents,..yes?
 

Gui10

Active Member
You are saying the same thing, when people talk about 'god', they generally have a personal mental concept of what it actually represents,..yes?

Yes.

And I know where you're giong with this, and I understand your point.

You are right that there obviously can't be one right deffinition if we all have deffinitions of our own.

HOWEVER, I think its important to differentiate them in order to communicate properly.
 
Last edited:

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Yes.

And I know where you're giong with this, and I understand your point.

You are right that there obviously can't be one right deffinition if we all have deffinitions of our own.

HOWEVER, I think its important to differentiate them in order to communicate properly.

Sure, speaking for myself, once I understand where they are coming from, I generally try and use their 'language' to communicate and see if their mind can apprehend the possibility of a reality beyond their present conceptual belief.
 

Gui10

Active Member
Sure, speaking for myself, once I understand where they are coming from, I generally try and use their 'language' to communicate and see if their mind can apprehend the possibility of a reality beyond their present conceptual belief.


Precisely! Right along with you on that one. :eek::bow:

Now, this being said. Do we care to debate about what three letter word ''god'' means? (Precisely in the Thread's Title; ''The Debate of God.'')
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Precisely! Right along with you on that one. :eek::bow:

Now, this being said. Do we care to debate about what three letter word ''god'' means? (Precisely in the Thread's Title; ''The Debate of God.'')
Hmmm,.."debate about what three letter word ''god'' means?"

Let's see how that works, you tell me what it means to you for a start,...ok?
 

F0uad

Well-Known Member
I think defining god can only be looked into how we attribute him most of the rest is beyond or comprehensions.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Come now, Thief. Now you're clutching at straws, with no ground to stand on.

You were not there with Moses to verify the authenticity of any so-called 'burning bush'. For all anyone knows, it was a hallucination or a dream, or worse, a real burning bush interpreted as a 'sign from God', with embellishments added as time went on.

...like the talking fish story...

...or the Tower of Babel story..

...or the water into wine story...

...or the resurrection and ascension story....

virgin birth, parting the Red Sea, raising from the dead, Johah's whale, ad nauseum.....

Maybe it all took place on the Good Ship Lollipop, eh, where Invisible Pink Unicorns danced into the night, and a good time was had by all....:biglaugh:

'Burning bush': again a PHYSICAL reference to describe the SPIRITUAL

And your basic approach to call all things illusion is valid?
having spoken as you just did?
 

Klerkie

Member
I personally do not believe in the Abrahamic god. However, there may be a possibility of multiple or a single much less powerful deity like thing.
 

RogerTheAtheist

A born-again freethinker
there are about 6 billion people who believe in God. if your questions are honest and sincere i'd like to hear them.

The number of people that believe in a claim doesn't affect whether or not it's true. Everyone might have once believed that the Earth was flat, but we now know that it's not. Believing that it was flat didn't make it flat.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
The number of people that believe in a claim doesn't affect whether or not it's true. Everyone might have once believed that the Earth was flat, but we now know that it's not. Believing that it was flat didn't make it flat.
True Roger, but for the sake of completeness, it's equally true that the number of people that don't believe in a claim doesn't affect whether or not it's true.
 

McBell

Unbound
The burning bush was a spiritual experience for Moses...no doubt.

And your complaint of my lack of definition is false.
Any third party reading this can see the point.

You on the other hand refuse to be cornered....declaring all of this as illusion
This third party sees you going to great lengths to avoid answering a direct question.

It is interesting how you stall and cannot answer such a simple question.

How do you determine that something is spiritual?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
This third party sees you going to great lengths to avoid answering a direct question.

It is interesting how you stall and cannot answer such a simple question.

How do you determine that something is spiritual?

I like definition no8 in Webster's....
highly refined in thought and feeling.
 
Top