Then the best thing do to is to not care,Your country, I care about, the opinions of your individual zionist posters, you might have, not so much.
rather than informing them you don't care.
(This makes it look like you care.)
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Then the best thing do to is to not care,Your country, I care about, the opinions of your individual zionist posters, you might have, not so much.
Ah yes, the art of insulting opinions you do not agree with in a futile attempt to invalidate them.For those that don’t speak “SJW”, allow me to translate: “Wah, boo hoo.”
Oh, Wiki tends to sort stuff out in understandable terms. Not always of course.Ah.......the Constitution is enough for me. US Constitution Article 2- section 1 Electoral College- 1787. US. Constitution Article 2- section 2 Appointment of Supreme Court Judges- 1789.
I don't trust WIKI.
Democrats have a strange idea of fairness.Yeah what the hell was that all about?
Then the best thing do to is to not care,
rather than informing them you don't care.
(This makes it look like you care.)
As do I.Err Ok?
I have vested genetic interest in your nation.![]()
As do I.
But things aren't so bad.
(In fact, they're really looking up for me & those I know.)
It's just the high volume of complaining for the sky-is-falling crowd.
Self storage & car storage....all I have left after the real estate crash in the oughts.What business you in, nuclear shelters? nooses? strong liquor? guns? survival equipment?![]()
The choice should wait until there isn’t a significant chance that Trump’s nominee will have to rule on a case involving Trump.You won't get a nominee through. There's also an election soon, the choice should wait until that is over.
I feel sorry for anyone living in the US right now, with an abject narcissistic retard in charge. The Democrats might be worried about supreme court nominations, but it's their (US) inadvisable system, of allowing the executive, ie Moron in chief Trump, to nominate 'his' people to the very highest judicial positions. Only a fully independant judiciary can deliver true equitable justice. Free from the executive government's control.
However it's not the Democrats caught between a rock and hard place, everyone in the US will suffer if Trump has his goons/sycophants/fellow nazis in the Supreme court undermine democracy and human rights. With their judgements.
The only people who might temporarily benefit from Trump's presidency are Israeli religious extremists, The UAE and Saudi Arabian governments, US far right nationalist religious bigots and Vladimir Putin. Of course.
As I have said before, it ain’t all about you. (or you and your friends).As do I.
But things aren't so bad.
(In fact, they're really looking up for me & those I know.)
It's just the high volume of complaining for the sky-is-falling crowd.
Not only studies proving you right when it comes to the majority of both parties. I'm also taking the word of conservatives as well. Conservatives hate the education system and legislate to ban critical thinking. Rush Limbaugh (conservative messiah), calls the education system "liberal indoctrination camps." Always on about "High Screwel (school)."
So why do the intellectual leaders of the conservative base demonize the education system? Studies show the more educated a person is, the less likely they'll vote republican. (propaganda doesn't work on critical thinking people as much)
So I think you're correct when you say Democrats are the educated party and Republicans are the uneducated party. When you look at the numbers, you have a winner.
Even Trump loves the uneducated. Clearly we agree.
You mean like the “study” of the 2016 election where President Trump was elected?We finally agree on something.
Studies prove you correct.
What are you kidding? I want people to read the lunatic rants of SJWs. Whenever they open their mouths they display their lack of understanding and true motives.Ah yes, the art of insulting opinions you do not agree with in a futile attempt to invalidate them.
I trust Judges to be more intelligent and nonpartisan than the average Republican voter. The Republican Federal judges votes have proven as much. As long as Trump nominates someone who actually knows law. As @tytlyf mentioned it might be a gamble to do that before elections that isn’t a Democrat issue.https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/07/us/politics/democrats-supreme-court-nominee.html
The Democrats are caught between a rock and a hard place.
That isn’t the odds for the House.According the odds makers in Las Vegas, the current odds of Republicans retaining control of the Senate are >70%.
Anyone want to bet?
So? The odds for retaining the House are almost 60%. And it is the Senate that confirms Supreme Court nominees. Did you have some point?That isn’t the odds for the House.