Nor anywhere near women
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Donald Trump Rape Trial is underway.
- Thread starter Subduction Zone
- Start date
Nor anywhere near women
Actually its about a rape accusation. But i can understand why you would want to minimise that
She wasn't charged for false allegations.
And the prosecutor who tried to frame the Duke team for rape was only disbarred & sent to jail for 1 day.Duke lacrosse case - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Our "justice" system is quite tolerant of false allegations & crooked prosecutors.
Thank you for clarifying that.
Here lawsuits are a double-edged sword, because if someone accuses Mr X of something not true, they will be fined and forced to compensate Mr X. And I am speaking of thousands of euros.
He's pretty nasty to men too.
He should only associate with robots.
I don't think he gropes men or (possibly) rapes them but your point is a good one
The trial is behind closed doors and journalists are incredibly vague.
It's not a criminal trial so conviction isn't possible. Being a civil case the standard of liability is lower than criminal cases, and all the jury has to decide is if the evidence suggests the suit is likely true. Trump isn't attending which is a bad decision, but he probably would be a bigger liability for himself in court, not being able to keep his mouth shut.
I think the case has a good chance of going against him, and that is due to witnesses that confirm Carroll said he raped her soon after, and explained why she didn't report it to the police. And on top of that all of the statements Trump has been caught saying that shows his attitude about sexual assault is that it's no big deal. If Trump loses I'm sure he will appeal, but in civil cases it has to be due to an actual problem with material evidence, not just because the person lost, so good luck there. Then it will be a matter of Carroll collecting the judgment. Trump will have to pay unless he's bankrupt, and then Carroll could file a lein on assets.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Last edited:
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Why am I not surprised that you would be a rape apologist?
Last edited:
Here, people generally get away with false accusations.
Lawyers don't want to discourage filing charges & suits.
Bogus suits are their bread & butter. I even heard one
lawyer claim this in court, & prevail.
Also, there appears to be some anti-male sexism here.
Women who make false rape claims are still seen as
sympathetic. Punishment, if ever there is any, is light.
But men are predators.
There are many ways to harm others.
Sexual assault is just one arrow in his quiver.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
She should have been. But at least the prosecutor saw some justice done. I hope that he was satisfied.She wasn't charged for false allegations.
And the prosecutor who tried to frame the Duke team for rape was only disbarred & sent to jail for 1 day.Duke lacrosse case - Wikipedia
Our "justice" system is quite tolerant of false allegations & crooked prosecutors.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You could always ask Trump.
Crooked prosecutors who try to frame people
for crimes should serve the sentence that
would've been imposed upon them.
I was essentially raped when I was aged 11, by an older boy. It didn't occur to me that this was what it was at the time, given that there was no 'consent' and it occurred on the spur of the moment apparently, although no doubt he planned it. Where would the evidence have been for my situation - apart from my older brother probably knowing what had happened but who failed to stop it since he was there at the time? Plenty of such examples could be found involving children, and the numbers of females who become intoxicated and who are essentially raped must be rather large too. Evidence is often just one word against another in such circumstances and the time being irrelevant, apart from a child later understanding what had happened perhaps, as in my case. I never pursued him because I didn't think it worthwhile and I had gotten over it long ago.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
It's not a criminal trial. It's a civil lawsuit.
I think American males should consider finding the one in Europe. Look at who Trump found.
Ameristanian women are better.
(I might be biased.)
I respect your opinion, but I consider European women much classier and more feminine.
American women surely are great too...that's just my personal impression.
Last edited: