buddhist
Well-Known Member
I agree ... I wasn't approving of this particular activity.Who do you think pays for the school building and its maintenance? THE TAXPAYERS.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I agree ... I wasn't approving of this particular activity.Who do you think pays for the school building and its maintenance? THE TAXPAYERS.
Yeah, the CBS report that aired this morning is where I got the idea for my OP. Thanks for posting it.
I'm flattered you took the time to do such a review. I don't think anyone else here would, so thank you.
.
Just all filled with amusing non-sequiturs this morning, aren't you.Just because you are hasty and sloppy that does not mean all of us are.
It could be done legally in the context with other scriptures from other religions being covered, but if not then it's unconstitutional.THOUGHTS?
Just all filled with amusing non-sequiturs this morning, aren't you.
.
But considering the remarks made by Cherilyn Thomas in the article, what's being done is more than simply looking at Christianity, but promulgating it.It could be done legally in the context with other scriptures from other religions being covered, but if not then it's unconstitutional.
It could be done legally in the context with other scriptures from other religions being covered
I beg to differ. The King James bible is a recognised piece of English and is quoted and used in English literature."Using the Bible to illustrate the English language is fine."
No it is not; it is translated, incredibly old and very often vague and ambiguous. It is a horrible way to illustrate the English language, and there is other literature out there that would do a much better at illustrating the English language. People should not be using the Bible to learn how to write effectively. Maybe some of the verses might be good for poetic writing, but it is not very good for learning how to write proper prose.
Who is going to teach the after-school. Can Hinduism, Islam and atheism be taught as well as an after-school activity?
So has Mad magazine.I beg to differ. The King James bible is a recognised piece of English and is quoted and used in English literature.
"It should be taught after school hours as a Bible club activity."
I would have no problem with that, personally. As long as attendance is not pushed in the school any more than any other club, and there is no tie whatsoever to judging academic performance, beyond the fact they participated in after school activities.
... at the church down the street from the school, completely unaffiliated with any government?It should be taught after school hours as a Bible club activity.
This is the correct response. After-hours, it isn't on the taxpayer dime, and you can do whatever you want. But to bring it in during actual school time? No. A million times, no. The validity of Christianity isn't a topic for the education of children, that's a private matter to be dealt with on your own time.
... at the church down the street from the school, completely unaffiliated with any government?
100% agreed.Starting in junior high, I think they should have a class on comparative religions and teach the basics o what the main religions of the world teach. Student need to have things that challenge their thinking, not just fed the same old pablum.
Why in the school?No. In the school,after school, and voluntary.