The first creature could not have come into being by random chance. It is impossible.

[osgart]

A valid question. By forming hypotheses and testing them we can find evidence that intellectual capacity comes from a neural network.

Now your turn: How can you support your beliefs?

You are finding correlation not causation between neural networks and intellectual capacity.

I can respond that neural networks inform our intellectual faculties. However there is the identity self, and that we are subjects to the experiences the brain provides. We are looking out at the environment as well as taking in information from the brain.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You are finding correlation not causation between neural networks and intellectual capacity.

I can respond that neural networks inform our intellectual faculties. However there is the identity self, and that we are subjects to the experiences the brain provides. We are looking out at the environment as well as taking in information from the brain.

Not true. You seem to have forgotten that scientist have tested and confirmed how individual nerves work. We have causation. We simply do not have all of the answers. And we definitely have evidence. You probably do not understand the concept of evidence.

There does not appear to be any reliable evidence for your beliefs.

 

[osgart]

Not true. You seem to have forgotten that scientist have tested and confirmed how individual nerves work. We have causation. We simply do not have all of the answers. And we definitely have evidence. You probably do not understand the concept of evidence.

There does not appear to be any reliable evidence for your beliefs.

Well where can I find this information about causation? Sounds like a Nobel prize is due someone.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Well where can I find this information about causation? Sounds like a Nobel prize is due someone.

Neuron - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[osgart]

Neuron - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This makes no reference to your claim.

 

[Twilight Hue]

There are soft dino tissue, intact DNA, intact bio molecules.
and of course there are diamonds and coal

No. There is a possibility of dna found in dinosaurs that was back in 2020 and remains controversial which the article explains.

Possible Dinosaur DNA Has Been Found

New discoveries have raised the possibility of exploring dino genetics, but controversy surrounds the results

www.scientificamerican.com

It's not yet been confirmed thus far since the publication of the article TMK.

 

[Subduction Zone]

This makes no reference to your claim.

Yes, it does. It gives the basic cause that you demanded.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No. There is a possibility of dna found in dinosaurs that was back in 2020 and remains controversial which the article explains.

Possible Dinosaur DNA Has Been Found

New discoveries have raised the possibility of exploring dino genetics, but controversy surrounds the results

www.scientificamerican.com

It's not yet been confirmed thus far since the publication of the article TMK.

Even the paper points out that this is highly dubious. It needs to be confirmed at the very least.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Even the paper points out that this is highly dubious. It needs to be confirmed at the very least.

So it maybe.

Wow all of evolution may have to rescinded worldwide. In fact, it should be until they can confirm. Of wait there is dino DNA.

DNA Found in Dinosaur Bones!

Despite allegedly having been extinct for millions of years, dinosaur bones have been found that contain original DNA and chromosomes!

newcreation.blog

 

[Twilight Hue]

Even the paper points out that this is highly dubious. It needs to be confirmed at the very least.

Yep. It's explained enough that even laypersons like myself can reasonably understand.

Particularly on how dna starts decaying upon death of the organism which is why it's so hard to find with the passage of time.

 

[Subduction Zone]

So it maybe.

Wow all of evolution may have to rescinded worldwide. In fact, it should be until they can confirm. Of wait there is dino DNA.

DNA Found in Dinosaur Bones!

Despite allegedly having been extinct for millions of years, dinosaur bones have been found that contain original DNA and chromosomes!

newcreation.blog

Well thanks for refuting your own claims by using a lying source.

You really need to learn not only the basics of science, evidence and logic. You need to learn how to debate properly too if you expect anyone to take you seriously.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Well thanks for refuting your own claims by using a lying source.

You really need to learn not only the basics of science, evidence and logic. You need to learn how to debate properly too if you expect anyone to take you seriously.

No I used a real source. But yours leaves open the possibility that there is dino DNA.

Until this is settled, evolution and billions of years should be retraced worldwide.

 

[Subduction Zone]

No I used a real source. But yours leaves open the possibility that there is dino DNA.

Until this is settled, evolution and billions of years should be retraced worldwide.

No, you used a lying source. And there seriously does not appear to be any such a possibility. The Scientific American article gave a more likely explanation.

But even if true that does not refute evolution or refute the many millions of years since the non-avian dinosaurs existed. You need to work on your logic skills.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

No, you used a lying source. And there seriously does not appear to be any such a possibility. The Scientific American article gave a more likely explanation.

But even if true that does not refute evolution or refute the many millions of years since the non-avian dinosaurs existed. You need to work on your logic skills.

It is a valid source. C-14 is present where it should not be.

Diamonds and Strata Have Too Much Carbon-14 | The Institute for Creation Research

www.icr.org

 

[Subduction Zone]

It is a valid source. C-14 is present where it should not be.

Diamonds and Strata Have Too Much Carbon-14 | The Institute for Creation Research

www.icr.org

Nope. Pseudoscience sources are never valid.

Answer this question for me:

If I used a source where to publish in it one had to swear that the theory of evolution was true no matter what, would that be a valid source? Would they be following the scientific method?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Nope. Pseudoscience sources are never valid.

Answer this question for me:

If I used a source where to publish in it one had to swear that the theory of evolution was true no matter what, would that be a valid source? Would they be following the scientific method?

It is a fact again. Evolution refuted yet again.

Carbon-14 Found in Dinosaur Fossils

New science directly challenges the millions-of-years dogma scattered throughout the blockbuster movie Jurassic World. The spring 2015 edition of the Creation Research Society Quarterly (CRSQ) is a special issue that focuses on the investigation of dinosaur proteins inside fossil bones. The last...

www.icr.org

 

[Subduction Zone]

It is a fact again. Evolution refuted yet again.

Carbon-14 Found in Dinosaur Fossils

New science directly challenges the millions-of-years dogma scattered throughout the blockbuster movie Jurassic World. The spring 2015 edition of the Creation Research Society Quarterly (CRSQ) is a special issue that focuses on the investigation of dinosaur proteins inside fossil bones. The last...

www.icr.org

Nope. Using a known lying source does not prove anything for you. Now that is easy as can be to refute, but you need to deal with the fact that your source openly admits to be a pseudoscience source. There is no science there.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Nope. Using a known lying source does not prove anything for you. Now that is easy as can be to refute, but you need to deal with the fact that your source openly admits to be a pseudoscience source. There is no science there.

Sensational dinosaur blood report!

Finding actual red blood cells in unfossilized dinosaur bones, along with evidence of hemoglobin, should not be possible if the millions of years are real; they should have disappeared long ago.

creation.com

 

[Subduction Zone]

Sensational dinosaur blood report!

Finding actual red blood cells in unfossilized dinosaur bones, along with evidence of hemoglobin, should not be possible if the millions of years are real; they should have disappeared long ago.

creation.com

Another non-science site.

By the way, there was no "blood" discovered. There were the possible remnants of blood cells, your source of course got the science wrong. They always do.

And did you know that the woman that discovered "soft tissue" in the T-Rex fossil used to be a YEC? She made the mistake of honestly trying to learn. She is still a Christian but she now knows that Genesis is not a science book.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Another non-science site.

By the way, there was no "blood" discovered. There were the possible remnants of blood cells, your source of course got the science wrong. They always do.

And did you know that the woman that discovered "soft tissue" in the T-Rex fossil used to be a YEC? She made the mistake of honestly trying to learn. She is still a Christian but she now knows that Genesis is not a science book.

Dinosaur Shocker

Probing a 68-million-year-old T. rex, Mary Schweitzer stumbled upon astonishing signs of life that may radically change our view of the ancient beasts

www.smithsonianmag.com