Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Never heard of him.
Was what DNA?
Sure why not. You need to introduce me to the fellow first.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The first creature could not have come into being by random chance. It is impossible.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
Was what DNA?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
And the answer is?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Strawberry
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Close, They are the 3rd listed in Genesis 1.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
but that is just a fairy tale. So why does it matter?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
It is the record of God Almighty.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
How would you prove that? Don't claim that you have because that would be a lie. What methodology would you use to prove that it was the "record of God Almighty"?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
It is a narrative that is a record of how God did it.
And I have proven it to be true by many infallible proofs.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It may be a narrative of how God did it, but the Greeks have the same. The Norse had the same. And no you have only demonstrated incredible ignorance. You know that. I know that. Everyone knows that.
I asked you what would be your methodology. You need to give details so that why or why not your proof works or fails.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
And who is worshipping the Norse gods?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Why would that make any difference at all?
Do you want to know the name of the logical fallacy that you just used?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Well all of evolutions and billions of years is a logical fallacy.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Really? Please show how they are so.
McBell
Unbound
You did no such thing.
At least not on RF.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Proof 1 used the law of non contradiction.
Proof 2 used mathematical induction.
Both are irrefutable.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, those are just claims that you did so. When I saw what you called "proofs" I was rolling on the floor with laughter.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
And your refutation?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I am not going to bother digging it up. You did not listen or understand the first time. You won't understand or listen if I dig it up again.
Instead of posting the whole thing, why not try it a line at a time to see if it works?
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
lost your homework I see.
This is not acceptable since you are a grownup.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I am not going to bother digging it up. You did not listen or understand the first time. You won't understand or listen if I dig it up again.
Instead of posting the whole thing, why not try it a line at a time to see if it works?