The first living thing could not have come into being by random chance, therefore, God Almighty created all things. Just 1 proof.

[SavedByTheLord]

The bible is a compilation of books by many authors. No god wrote a single word.

What's an evolutionist? Is that a label that you use trying to condemn people, again?

Where does jesus approve of you throwing those rocks at people?

It was all inspired by God.

I do not throw rocks at people. I lovingly tell them the truth. Some hate the truth and those that tell it.
It is hateful to tell lies. And here is Christ lovingly warning you and prophesying about you.

13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

 

[F1fan]

Read Genesis 1. It was 6 days and about 6000 years ago.

You never explained why your assumptions are truer than science. Science has facts on its side. You don’t.

All evolution.
Darwin's writings were embarrassing.

Darwin was cutting edge in 1860. Science has come a long way since then.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You never explained why your assumptions are truer than science. Science has facts on its side. You don’t.

Darwin was cutting edge in 1860. Science has come a long way since then.

Evolution is not science. It is anti-science and just repackaged pagan myths.

 

[McBell]

Evolution is not science. It is anti-science and just repackaged pagan myths.

Please be so kind as to present these pagan myths you claim evolution is repackaged from

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Please be so kind as to present these pagan myths you claim evolution is repackaged from

The god chemicalA had relations with the goddess chemicalB and out came ImpossibleSaurus.

 

[McBell]

The god chemicalA had relations with the goddess chemicalB and out came ImpossibleSaurus.

So another bold empty claim by you?

Does your favorite chosen deity approve of your dishonesty?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

So another bold empty claim by you?

Does your favorite chosen deity approve of your dishonesty?

Well where did the first living creature come from?

 

[McBell]

Well where did the first living creature come from?

You did not answer my question, thus I see no reason to answer your question again.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You did not answer my question, thus I see no reason to answer your question again.

How did feathers evolve?

 

[McBell]

How did feathers evolve?

You did not answer my question, thus I see no reason to answer your question

 

[SavedByTheLord]

You did not answer my question, thus I see no reason to answer your question

Feathers could never have evolved through evolution. Way too intricate.

Evolution - the Theory of Nothing with their almighty god, nobody, and their circular reasoning in everything, so they can hide the fact that they have no answer for the origin of anything.

 

[McBell]

Feathers could never have evolved through evolution. Way too intricate.

Prove it.

Evolution - the Theory of Nothing with their almighty god, nobody, and their circular reasoning in everything, so they can hide the fact that they have no answer for the origin of anything.

The theory of evolution has nothing to say about the origin of life.
That would be abiogenesis.

So you just shot yourself in the foot... again.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Prove it.


The theory of evolution has nothing to say about the origin of life.
That would be abiogenesis.

So you just shot yourself in the foot... again.

They are desperate to run and hide from abiogenesis.
Without the first living creature, there is no evolution.

 

[John53]

They are desperate to run and hide from abiogenesis.
Without the first living creature, there is no evolution.

So what?

It's like saying without pigs there is no bacon.

So what!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[SavedByTheLord]

So what?

It's like saying without pigs there is no bacon.

So what!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That is a pretty bad analogy.

 

[John53]

That is a pretty bad analogy.

Why?

 

[SavedByTheLord]

Why?

Because dodging the requires answer to abiogenesis has nothing to do with pigs or bacon.
Where did the pig come from, given that abisogenis is impossible.

 

[John53]

Because dodging the requires answer to abiogenesis has nothing to do with pigs or bacon.
Where did the pig come from, given that abisogenis is impossible.

I don't think you understand what an analogy.

Sorry that is incorrect. I know you don't understand what an analogy is.

 

[SavedByTheLord]

I don't think you understand what an analogy.

Sorry that is incorrect. I know you don't understand what an analogy is.

Now back to debate 101 stuff.

 

[F1fan]

Evolution is not science.

So your whole approach is the Seinfeld Bizzaro World nonsense? Black is white. Up is down. Left is tight. Hot is cold. On and on.

You do realize that you are talking to a group that is educated and knows evolution is science? Why you reject knowledge is the question.

It is anti-science and just repackaged pagan myths.

Unlike the Jesus resurrection being copied from Egyptian lore.