People inspired by God fighting another lot inspired by God. Praising God as they murder, rape and kidnap.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The first living thing could not have come into being by random chance, therefore, God Almighty created all things. Just 1 proof.
- Thread starter SavedByTheLord
- Start date
People inspired by God fighting another lot inspired by God. Praising God as they murder, rape and kidnap.
McBell
Unbound
Does this mean that the amount of verbal games you play is indicative of just how badly you are losing?
What's another word for thesaurus?
See post #1199
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
That was not a verbal game. As I said, you should just admit that you do not understand analogies. I have noticed this among quite a few creationists. They tend to be too literal so they cannot understand concepts that are explained that way. That also explains why they do not understand so much of the Bible.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I told you that it would not do any good.
I wanted proof they were ignoring me blatantly.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yep, he does that. Two days ago I gave him an extended explanation of why we have one fewer pair of chromosomes than other great apes. There was not a peep in response. That is why I won't answer his questions until he apologizes and promises to change how he posts.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
What do you think of the findings by Robert Gentry?
Do you agree with the censorship he endured?
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Read it and does not address the issues that Gentry uncovered. They flubbed it because of circular reasoning.CF201: Polonium Haloes
www.talkorigins.org
What was the first living creature and what features did it have?
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
Yes it does. Perhaps the problem is that you didn't understand it.
I predict you will not explain it.
I was. And my features are noodly appendages.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
What was the first living creature?
Where there any enzymes in it? Which ones? Certain required reactions need enzymes as catalysts. If not, the reaction may take a vast number of years. Surely the primitive thing could not last more than a minute much less than many years.
TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
How many more times must I answer this?
It was me. Me. MEEEEEEEE
I am way above such pityfull bio-chemistry.
I have lasted for billions of years. Or 5 seconds. It's all relative.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Stanley.
Maybe.
Why does it matter?
Do they?
Really? Are you sure that enzymes are the only answer?
Why not? Primitive things do not "burn energy" the way that modern life does. Of course you are trying to refute life without even properly defining it first.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
So no answer.
Where did the eye come from?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you just did not like the answers. If you can get serious then so can I.
Eye evolution has been explained to you several times.
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
And that was just a fable from the circular reasoning delusion.
Here is a link which shows that many dinosaurs tissue are not C-14 dead and therefor are not about 100 million years old,
So evolution, billions of year, and the rock layer age assumpotions are all false,
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
SavedByTheLord
Well-Known Member
Time to take your medicine ano admit the truth.
the Big Bang is dead.
The red shift theory is dead.
Evolution and billions have year is dead.
Abiogenesis is dead.
Atheism is dead.
The dating of fossils and rock layers is false.
Uniformatraianism is dead.
Christ has no rivals, being God Almighty.
The redshift theory has been disproved, even your guys know it,
So there is no expansion of the universe.
So no Big Bang,
But then there should just be ghostly neutrinos and nothing else.
The Hubble Tension Is Extremely Real—and Extremely Frustrating
We still don’t know why different measurements of the rate of the universe’s expansion don’t match. But at least we know we can’t blame the Hubble telescope.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No. Your inability to understand basic science does not make those dead. Your fear of learning even the bare bone basics tells everyone that even you do not believe the nonsense that you post.Time to take your medicine ano admit the truth.
the Big Bang is dead.
The red shift theory is dead.
Evolution and billions have year is dead.
Abiogenesis is dead.
Atheism is dead.
The dating of fossils and rock layers is false.
Uniformatraianism is dead.
Christ has no rivals, being God Almighty.
The redshift theory has been disproved, even your guys know it,
So there is no expansion of the universe.
So no Big Bang,
But then there should just be ghostly neutrinos and nothing else.
The Hubble Tension Is Extremely Real—and Extremely Frustrating
We still don’t know why different measurements of the rate of the universe’s expansion don’t match. But at least we know we can’t blame the Hubble telescope.www.yahoo.com
And as a result, even if the myths of Genesis are true, you are calling God a liar. How do you justify doing that. You never answer that very serious question. You have to go to lying source after lying source, but none of them can change the fact that all of the scientific evidence supports the theory of evolution. That is why you have to keep yourself willfully ignorant. You might learn too muc.
Do you really want to convince others? Then put your money where your mouth is and learn what is and what is not evidence and why And learn the scientific method.
But I predict that your fear and weak faith will win out. The strong in faith are not afraid to learn.