And I agree.Some of us don't find bigotry funny.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And I agree.Some of us don't find bigotry funny.
Really? I wonder if you could explain to me what it is that motivates the bud light boycott?And I agree.
I never said it was funny.Really? I wonder if you could explain to me what it is that motivates the bud light boycott?
And what it is you think is funny about it?
An ideologue? Tell me what ideologue you are talking about.I never said it was funny.
It was the Dems in sheep's clothing that was funny.
The Bud light boycott is simply people who have had enough of having an ideologue promoted to which they don't agree with.
So, they're just being a bunch of babies.I never said it was funny.
It was the Dems in sheep's clothing that was funny.
The Bud light boycott is simply people who have had enough of having an ideologue promoted to which they don't agree with.
That may have been true at one time, but not anymore. At least not in any cities that I've visited lately.False. People in cities are as close as those anywhere else.
In the case of Bud... that there are more than 50 genders (paraphrased)An ideologue? Tell me what ideologue you are talking about.
Could be. Or maybe they are adult enough to stand on their beliefs? Doesn't really matter... they are doing what they are doing. Doesn't matter to me... I don't drink beer.So, they're just being a bunch of babies.
Really? Bud light said there are more than 50 genders? And that is why there was a boycott? I need a source for that.In the case of Bud... that there are more than 50 genders (paraphrased)
"This buds for you" may not necessarily refer to beer.In the case of Bud... that there are more than 50 genders (paraphrased)
That may be missing the point that in a large town or city, one's part of the town/city may be very well close nit. Besides our own extended family, our neighborhood in one of Detroit's suburbs very much have each other's back and are helpful.I lived in both. Small town are closer knit, help each other more, support each other more, etc.
Some rural areas where poverty is a problem really ain't much different-- just on a smaller scale.
A suburb of a city isn't the same thing as a city.That may be missing the point that in a large town or city, one's part of the town/city may be very well close nit. Besides our own extended family, our neighborhood in one of Detroit's suburbs very much have each other's back and are helpful.
We live in a large suburb of over 100,000, and we've lived here in the same house for 50 years.A suburb of a city isn't the same thing as a city.
I mentioned in my last post that you get a few miles out of Chicago and things start to change pretty quick. Reason being, among other things, suburbs have their own identity. A lot of them have their own Town council, police force and fire departments.
It's a separate community, and proximity to a big city doesn't equate to being part of that city, or predict any shared characteristics.
It's still a small town.
Basically a small city then. It's still not Detroit.We live in a large suburb of over 100,000, and we've lived here in the same house for 50 years.
So? It's what one makes of it that really counts imo.Basically a small city then. It's still not Detroit.
So? It's what one makes of it that really counts imo.
BTW, one of my wife's relatives [Italian] lived in an area of Detroit whereas he was the only white guy, and he didn't want to leave but had to because he was going blind as he was in his 70's.
My family is from the U.P. and my wife and I had a place there up until 4 years ago, plus we spent most of at least part of our summers there even before we bought our place. My wife is a "Sicilian Yooper" by injection.Btw, I thought you guys lived in the UP.