Well, apparently the shock was well deployed then. Here is hoping we get more of that and more often.It was meant to shock. That's my take on it.
It is well past time we stopped fearing disapproval of such harmless actions.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Well, apparently the shock was well deployed then. Here is hoping we get more of that and more often.It was meant to shock. That's my take on it.
Da Vinci would probably shove us all out of the way to be the first to defend the parodies and satires of his work, including this one.Not sure how that would justify some sort of disapproval from any other use of the general motif, accidental or otherwise. And it is a simple enough and general enough disposition to be reinvented time and again. I have not attempted to find previous examples, but I will be very surprised if Da Vinci was the first one.
It was depicting an Ancient Greek Bacchanalia.
You know, the Greeks who invented the Olympics.
Do Christians think the blue guy was supposed to be Jesus? I'm confused.
It was meant to shock. That's my take on it.
Da Vinci would probably shove us all out of the way to be the first to defend the parodies and satires of his work, including this one.Not sure how that would justify some sort of disapproval from any other use of the general motif, accidental or otherwise. And it is a simple enough and general enough disposition to be reinvented time and again. I have not attempted to find previous examples, but I will be very surprised if Da Vinci was the first one.
You should read up on the Ancient Greeks.If they had wanted to homage the ancient Greece, they would have imitated Greece, like in this ceremony.
No...they wanted to do something fuchsia...something celebrating the homosexualization of society...
The painting it was parodying was based on The Last Supper.It was depicting an Ancient Greek Bacchanalia.
You know, the Greeks who invented the Olympics.
Do Christians think the blue guy was supposed to be Jesus? I'm confused.
Thanks for that. No, it doesn't to me, but apparently it did to a lot of Christians.Does this look anything like the Last Supper?
The Christians are not mockers. They are oppressors. They ban books they don't like. They pass "don't say gay" legislation. They want to eliminate same sex marriage.The mocked became the mockers. Do unto others what you hate being done to you. Great philosophy.
I'm beginning to think that what they did isn't what the Christians objecting say they did, but let's stipulate to the idea that this was what the offended say it was. If so, it suggests that the French don't fear mocking the Christians. It's a different culture, one I am unfamiliar withFrance is presenting itself to the world as the face of the Olympics. So, why do this?
Why do you think this is the work of the government? Somebody in government probably had to approve the performance, and that may have been Macron, but whoever it was obviously didn't see it like you do.is the government there a simple mouthpiece for such causes?
Your American perspective considers it a mistake. I wonder what the French are saying about it? Maybe @ChristineM can shed some light on that.The whole thing just seems like a big unforced error, IMHO.
The painting it was parodying is based on The Last Supper. Oh well, this too shall pass. By the way, I don't know anyone who dislikes or is jealous of France other than disliking a few Parisians, though I will say that in the Alsace Lorraine region, the breakfasts pretty much suck, especially compared to German breakfasts which are right across the border.Nope, it was meant to represent Greek gods, you know, the Greeks who invented the Olympic games.
People are misrepresenting it, why, i have no idea other than possibly either dislike or jealousy of France.
As it turns out, I have now made a bit of research. Da Vinci, praised be him, was not nearly the first to even depict the Last Supper in that general motif. ChatGPT gave me this:Da Vinci would probably shove us all out of the way to be the first to defend the parodies and satires of his work, including this one.
They are attempting to get revenge for the loss of Freedom Fries, perhaps?Nope, it was meant to represent Greek gods, you know, the Greeks who invented the Olympic games.
People are misrepresenting it, why, i have no idea other than possibly either dislike or jealousy of France.
Nope, it was meant to represent Greek gods, you know, the Greeks who invented the Olympic games.
People are misrepresenting it, why, i have no idea other than possibly either dislike or jealousy of France.
So you say. Is Jesus a blue guy now?The painting it was parodying was based on The Last Supper.
Just look it up, don't take my word for it.So you say.
Nobody gets this offended over Jesus toast.Nope, it was meant to represent Greek gods, you know, the Greeks who invented the Olympic games.
People are misrepresenting it, why, i have no idea other than possibly either dislike or jealousy of France.
The painting it was parodying is based on The Last Supper. Oh well, this too shall pass.
Nobody gets this offended over Jesus toast.
In fairness, I think France has given and continues to give many countries ample reasons to dislike it, so I'm sure that's part of it for some people. Another part seems to me the typical outrage that irreverence, whether intended or inadvertent, toward religion tends to elicit from many people. I would think the dislike and the outrage would just compound each other, too.