Go back and read what I said; notice I included "the capitalist has to convince the customer his product is valuable"Do you actually believe that any person you bamboozled into buying a product they didn't need would be genuinely happy for it?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Go back and read what I said; notice I included "the capitalist has to convince the customer his product is valuable"Do you actually believe that any person you bamboozled into buying a product they didn't need would be genuinely happy for it?
But doesn't it infuriate you that somebody's tax dollars are being used to extinguish another person's house fire? Fire departments are by your standards "communist".Back with the stupid roads are a political philosophy analogy I see.
Added in fire departments too as well. Novel.
I happen to like volunteer and local departments personally. The raffles and chicken dinner fundraisers can be a lot of fun.
No. That is your sole assumption and self provided examples all on your own that you made, complete with your own conclusions.But doesn't it infuriate you that somebody's tax dollars are being used to extinguish another person's house fire? Fire departments are by your standards "communist".
Care to provide some examples? It's interesting that you've long been quick to call out hypocrisy, inconsistency, bias, double standards, etc. when it comes to liberals yet not conservatives, even though the latter holds the lion's share of guilt in that regard.Are you fine when liberals "screech" that those things are "socialism"?
I think that it all depends what one means by capitalism.I think it important to remember that while all systems start off promoting the values and ideals they stand for, all systems- including capitalism - evolve and, over time, become something very different to what was intended.
The ideal of capitalism was one of social mobility and prosperity for more than just the upper classes, where all who wanted should have a chance to try their industry and possibly succeed.
These were not bad ideals and historically speaking, for a while, capitalism did work.
I’ll be frank; I had thought of going deeper into this but realised that it would be long and that I do not have the energy at the moment.
Nah, it fits right in with your misusage of terminology. My straw man is right at home in your straw world.No. That is your sole assumption and self provided examples all on your own that you made, complete with your own conclusions.
Nice strawman. Well built.
Lol. No.Nah, it fits right in with your misusage of terminology. My straw man is right at home in your straw world.
That one always make me roll my eyes because clearly this hasn't always been the case, even under capitalist systems. Capitalism let people put on price tag on everything, even other people. We had no "tragedy of the commons." We do have a "crisis of privatization."
Also because these are often the same people who don't respect individuals, their persuit of happiness, or rights. They'll say it's the right of the business to discriminate against minorities, but cry foul when one of their own is punished for breaking the agreed to rules of a private entity.
Lol. No.
I've ofte criticized both conservatives & liberals for this.Care to provide some examples? It's interesting that you've long been quick to call out hypocrisy, inconsistency, bias, double standards, etc. when it comes to liberals yet not conservatives, even though the latter holds the lion's share of guilt in that regard.
I've explained the context. What else can I do to help?I've ofte criticized both conservatives & liberals for this.
But changing the focus to me, when you're the one
mis-using "socialism" & "communism" is bogus.
Correct the socialists when they mis-use the term.I've explained the context. What else can I do to help?
Perhaps this subject deserves a thread of its own.Correct the socialists when they mis-use the term.
Not when you exchange freedoms for it.Much of Europe likes capitalism to keep things going, but enough socialism to be good for people over corporations. Perfect mix, IMO.
Not when you exchange freedoms for it.
I prefer my freedoms.They seem fine with it. Most other first world nations would not change with us.
That doesn't mean their product actually is valuable or useful for the customer; only that the seller has successfully convinced them that this would be the case.Go back and read what I said; notice I included "the capitalist has to convince the customer his product is valuable"
Even Margaret Thatcher and Boris Johnson love the NHS. That's long enough between them we can say it's not a honeymoon. Sweden has had it's "cradle to grave protections" for a while now as well, it's not a honeymoon.I prefer my freedoms.
Watch how sorry they will become once the honeymoon is over.
What freedoms have European countries exchanged for functional social security systems?Not when you exchange freedoms for it.