amorphous_constellation
Well-Known Member
There are recent trending articles about how u.s. bases were swarmed by mysterious drones for 17 days.. maybe ufo drones. Seems like it should be more concerning than our little election rounds, or no?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No. An alien intelligence that could visit us could overwhelm us if they wanted, so if they wanted we'd already be ET food. And since they don't exist, it seems highly unlikely.There are recent trending articles about how u.s. bases were swarmed by mysterious drones for 17 days.. maybe ufo drones. Seems like it should be more concerning than our little election rounds, or no?
Uh huh. Great comment, Have a great day!The sickness is all yours.
Trump's hatred *IS* the truth, a truth you either can't see or condone.
Here's more paradox. If you love love, then you likely hate its enemies and defend love from them in unloving ways if necessary. Contempt for Trump is an expression of love of country. You don't shame anybody by pointing out that they hate Trump except yourself for failing to do the same.
We see more of this type of paradox with so-called peace officers (police). To protect or restore the peace, sometimes they must resort to physical force including tasers and guns.
There's something in the above that we don't talk about much, but what I hear from Trump supporters more than anything else is, "I was better off during his administration." This, of course, means money. Yes, inflation happened, but it's cause can be directly linked to Trump, his handling of the pandemic, and the first big packages to aid individuals and businesses, along with the failure to impose means of containing the virus and slowing the spread.The sickness is all yours.
Trump's hatred *IS* the truth, a truth you either can't see or condone.
Here's more paradox. If you love love, then you likely hate its enemies and defend love from them in unloving ways if necessary. Contempt for Trump is an expression of love of country. You don't shame anybody by pointing out that they hate Trump except yourself for failing to do the same.
We see more of this type of paradox with so-called peace officers (police). To protect or restore the peace, sometimes they must resort to physical force including tasers and guns.
I wager many dem voters from the USA wish Trudeau was their Potus.
Multiple Members of Parliament are trying to force Trudeau to resign.
But that is an accomplishment that will be undone if Trump is elected.What does this have to do with Kamala? Sounds like saving America from a dictatorship is a pretty good accomplishment.
Ok, hope she can do that if she needs to.But that is an accomplish that will be undone if Trump is elected.
Harris was not called upon to prevent a dictatorship, until now.
Harris was called upon to unleash WW3 and to turn Europe into a nuclear battlefield.But that is an accomplishment that will be undone if Trump is elected.
Harris was not called upon to prevent a dictatorship, until now.
What!??!Harris was called upon to unleash WW3 and to turn Europe into a nuclear battlefield.
So we Europeans are all nuked and dead.
But I put this into your conscience: do you really care if we all die?
I am sure the answer will be no.
But I put this into your conscience: do you really care if we all die?
I am sure the answer will be no.
My guess is that @Balthazzar is just asking for something that many of us would like to see more of here: someone offering a rational and detailed explanation for their endorsement of their candidate/party rather than just making doomsday predictions about what would happen if the other side wins.There is expert analysis in many publications. I guess you are admitting of being one of those poorly informed people out there making decisions that affect our nation and global affairs. That's why Trump has so much support:
Bad judgment by poory informed citizens.
Let me help you do the homework you should be doing yourself as a citizen
The Fiscal Impact of the Harris and Trump Campaign Plans | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
The next President will face significant fiscal challenges upon taking office, including record debt levels, large structural deficits, surging interest payments, and the looming insolvency of critwww.crfb.org
Trump’s Tariff Proposals Would Raise Tariff Rates to Great Depression-Era Levels
Using tariff policy to reallocate investment and jobs is a costly mistake—that’s a history lesson we should not forget.taxfoundation.org
What happens to Ukraine if Trump wins?
The foreign policy differences between the candidates were on display this week with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy meeting with both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. The panel discusses what could happen in Ukraine if Trump wins the election.www.pbs.org
Could NATO survive a second Trump administration?
Even if a Trump administration left NATO alone, could Europe count on the mercurial former president when the chips were down?www.brookings.edu
I am a skeptical thinker, also. It was the "All because" statement you made that I was compelled to contribute with the inquiry.
F1fan said:I guess you are admitting of being one of those poorly informed people out there making decisions that affect our nation and global affairs. That's why Trump has so much support:
Bad judgment by poory informed citizens.
F1fan said:Let me help you do the homework you should be doing yourself as a citizen.
I agree that Trump is too flawed but I am going to write in a vote, not vote for Harris. I do not live in a swing state by the way, and my vote is unlikely to change anything one way or the other but someone will see it somewhere and that's good enough for me.I voted early yesterday. I voted for Harris. I’m a life long (R). Trump is just way too flawed!
I actually tried to do that, in a slightly unconventional but (in my view) very useful way in this thread -- to which not a single member has even posted a comment.My guess is that @Balthazzar is just asking for something that many of us would like to see more of here: someone offering a rational and detailed explanation for their endorsement of their candidate/party rather than just making doomsday predictions about what would happen if the other side wins.
This might be true in 2008 between Obama and McCain. Or in 2012 between Obama and Romney. And even in 2016 between Clinton and Trump as all these candidates had fairly workable ideas. Trump in 2024 has more risky ideas that could not only affect the USA but also global stability. Want details? Trump’s notable support for Putin will mean a destabilizing impact for Ukraine and NATO countries. We can’t reslly predict outcomes but the risk of a global war would increase.My guess is that @Balthazzar is just asking for something that many of us would like to see more of here: someone offering a rational and detailed explanation for their endorsement of their candidate/party rather than just making doomsday predictions about what would happen if the other side wins.
My guess is that @Balthazzar is just asking for something that many of us would like to see more of here: someone offering a rational and detailed explanation for their endorsement of their candidate/party rather than just making doomsday predictions about what would happen if the other side wins.
I was expecting something like: I do care about Europe's safety.What!??!
Literally none of what I said has anything to do with who to vote for.This might be true in 2008 between Obama and McCain. Or in 2012 between Obama and Romney. And even in 2016 between Clinton and Trump as all these candidates had fairly workable ideas. Trump in 2024 has more risky ideas that could not only affect the USA but also global stability. Want details? Trump’s notable support for Putin will mean a destabilizing impact for Ukraine and NATO countries. We can’t reslly predict outcomes but the risk of a global war would increase.
That alone should be enough to not vote for Trump. He is disturbed and growing more aggressive against the media, citizens, and political opponents. That’s unacceptable. Yet he’s being treated as if he is a typical politician and candidate. He’s nothing of the sort.
There’s only one emotionally stable candidate who can be trusted. Is she perfect? No. But she is stable.
I was referring to your statement that " Harris was called upon to unleash WW3 and to turn Europe into a nuclear battlefield. So we Europeans are all nuked and dead."I was expecting something like: I do care about Europe's safety.
I am afraid I will never listen to that from you.
Trump does care.
In exactly the same way that you're suggesting that we should teach wallabies how to play the accordion.So are you saying that Trump is not a substantial and, as far as the U.S. is concerned, nearly unprecedented threat to democracy and the rule of law?