So you see something to remedy? What would that be?I believe I can remedy that.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So you see something to remedy? What would that be?I believe I can remedy that.
So you see something to remedy? What would that be?
Uh, why would I do that?I believe if you wish to talk with God talk with me.
So, to my question "how do we know who has the author" you reply "only the ones who have the author know".
Did I get this right?
Ciao
- viole
Uh, why would I do that?
Seriously, is there any reason?
I don't mind God one way or the other. I mind people expecting me to pursue a God that I have no reason to believe in.Please excuse me. I had the impression that you might not be happy that God hid from you. I believe it may be the other way around.
I believe so. Both parties will be in agreement because the same spirit does not have two opposite things to say.
Yes, but there might be other parties that might disagree with your parties. In fact there are a lot of parties all disagreeing on some basic stuff, last but not least whether Jesus is God or not.
And they will also say that they have the author, and all the others are wrong.
So, what epistemology do you propose for me to decide who is right?
Ciao
- viole
I don't mind God one way or the other. I mind people expecting me to pursue a God that I have no reason to believe in.
I believe those people are God seeking you.
I am not even sure that reason makes sense. I am sitting in a chair. I don't have to go through any reasoning to believe that because I am experiencing it. The same is true for God.
1. Yes, of course. Why follow a religion that isn't the truth?Three questions here...
1. Do you believe the religion you have chosen to be the only "true" religion?
2. If the answer to question #1 is "yes," what exactly does that mean to you?
3. If the answer to question #1 is "yes," what do you believe will be the fate of those who do not share your beliefs?
Well, I can't personally think of a reason, but you'd be surprised at how many people don't really seem to think it's all that important.1. Yes, of course. Why follow a religion that isn't the truth?
So if a sincere and decent person doesn't "know the truth about God," do you believe he is destined to "destruction"? And how would you describe "destruction"?3. I believe it is extremely important to know the truth about God.
No one is destined for destruction. "Jehovah is not slow concerning his promise, as some people consider slowness, but he is patient with you because he does not desire anyone to be destroyed but desires all to attain to repentance." (2 Peter 3:9)Well, I can't personally think of a reason, but you'd be surprised at how many people don't really seem to think it's all that important.
So if a sincere and decent person doesn't "know the truth about God," do you believe he is destined to "destruction"? And how would you describe "destruction"?
Well, I believe we are living in the equivalent (e.g. an alien's dream) of a computer simulation. I further believe that the universe won't be destroyed when the alien wakes up, and instead all of our brain is stored on hard disk. I believe that when we "die" we will be given a chance to negotiate a new existence, perhaps as ceremonial king/queen of some other solar system or even galaxy. There's a lot of real estate out there. If you have been a prick your entire life, you may have difficulty in the negotiations. Regardless, you will be asked "what do you want?", and you will not be tortured in Hell for eternity.Three questions here...
1. Do you believe the religion you have chosen to be the only "true" religion?
2. If the answer to question #1 is "yes," what exactly does that mean to you?
3. If the answer to question #1 is "yes," what do you believe will be the fate of those who do not share your beliefs?
Yes, but there might be other parties that might disagree with your parties. In fact there are a lot of parties all disagreeing on some basic stuff, last but not least whether Jesus is God or not.
And they will also say that they have the author, and all the others are wrong.
So, what epistemology do you propose for me to decide who is right?
Ciao
- viole
In that case, God should learn better.
So God does not exist? Fine by me.
Well, I can't personally think of a reason, but you'd be surprised at how many people don't really seem to think it's all that important.
So if a sincere and decent person doesn't "know the truth about God," do you believe he is destined to "destruction"? And how would you describe "destruction"?
I believe that is a non-sequitur.
I believe you are out of luck because God believes He already knows better and has no intentions of having you try to teach Him.