Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The Palestinians became a people of this land long ago and have just as much right to live there as does any Jew.What do you mean you don't like colonizers? You think all lands in the Middle East should go back to their original and "rightful" owners, and that Arabs colonizers of the Middle East and North Africa should go back to Arabia? Or do you apply the title "colonizer" only to non-Muslim "Westerners"?
Back to my original question: Why would it be immoral to target Jewish colonizers in the West Bank assuming Hamas did not attack any cities within the State of Israel (this being all internationally recognized territory of Israel and perhaps Jerusalem)
Sure, they have just as much right to live in Israel. Both have a claim to land, detracting from the rights of one is disgusting.because according to your earlier posts and your words they have "just as much right to live there as does any Jew."
OK so you recognize the right of Israelis to live in of a state of Israel , what borders are you happy with?Sure, they have just as much right to live in Israel. Both have a claim to land, detracting from the rights of one is disgusting.
We are talking about people who have lived in ancestral homes for centuries regarding them as anything BUT inhabitants of the land is disgraceful. People whose ancestry is intrinsically linked with those who have lived in the area since pre-historic times.
I am happy with the borders enforced by the U.N resolution 242 of course. However, realizing the reality of the situation that Israel will continue to provide support for their illegal colonies I am ok with the swapping of some settlements in exchange for others.OK so you recognize the right of Israelis to live in of a state of Israel , what borders are you happy with?
It is published transcripts, there is little room for bias.
The transcripts are available for all to see. And they encompass the Israeli reaction to and their own counter proposal to some of the most generous terms the P.A afforded. They do well to show the response of both the "conservative" and "liberal" parties in Israel and exactly what demands either party imposes. Aside from that any Israeli thought is irrelevant as I am talking about Fatah's role as leaders for the Palestinian people.The bias is in the selectivity of their reports.
I don't much care for the spin that you put on the quotes it is quite obvious that any such idiotic assumption is rejected flat out by historical references that explicitly state the greater freedom of Jews, the adoption of Jews and Christians as people of the book, and the influx of Jews into Jerusalem.
The transcripts are available for all to see.
Regarding the subject at hand, how can borders be negotiated when these colonies grow every day Kai? What exact message do you think it is the Israelis are sending.
Would you like to look at the rate of colonists throughout a general time period?I am not sure what message their sending , i dont know what message the dismantled 18 settlements in the Sinai Peninsula in 1982, and all 21 in the Gaza Strip and 4 in the West bank in 2005. was sending because keep them or lose them it didn't really matter to the peace process, not with the Palestinians anyway.
Zionists actively promote a racist apartheid solution of stealing Arab land. Well known Zionists have recognized and expressed that the objective is to dispossess the Arabs to establish a Jewish state. This is an extensive and unrelated topic, stop derailing this thread.
Would you like to look at the rate of colonists throughout a general time period?
1948: 2,810
1966: 0
1972:10,608 1
1983: 106,595
1993: 281,800
2004: 441,165
2007: 484,862
2009: 516,569
Total number of colonizers in Gaza, West Bank, Eastern Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.
Israeli settlement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So you don't think this is sending one resounding message :sarcastic
I don't know how you are interpreting this, but it sounds pretty clear to me.geneticist Michael Hammer from the University of Arizona in Tucson found that the Y chromosome in Middle Eastern Arabs was almost indistinguishable from that of Jews...
Many of the Jewish subjects were descended from ancestors who presumably originated in the Levant but dispersed (forced expulsion) throughout Europe before returning to Israel in the past few generations;
ONLY Centuries? Oddly, I would have expected that to go back much further. An interesting foible in the text, to be sure.most of the Arab subjects could trace their ancestry to men who had lived in the region for centuries or longer.
Thus, Jews have as much right to be in the area as the so-called "Palestinians". What part of this are you not getting?Other short segments of DNA called microsatellites were similar enough to reveal that the men must have had common ancestors within the past several thousand years.
I'm afraid I don't need a biological breakdown to explain this. There has been interbreeding going on for over a thousand years. Obviously Jews have been present for there to be any connection at all.Yeah right, you are in complete denial. A large chunk, if not a majority, of Palestinians are decedents of those having lived in Palestine since the Paleolithic era.
Congratulations at destroying your own argument. Bravo. The DNA evidence points out the fact that it is also the ancestral hone to the Jews. There is no escaping this point. I will accept that the so-called "Palestinians" have a right to the land if you agree that the Jews have a right to the Jewish state of Israel. Fair if fair, after all.That said your argument is flawed from the get go. The Israelis conquered Canaan and thus they too have no right to the land It is a very shallow statement and it disregards the fact that the rest of the Palestinians have been living in that land for centuries. It is their ancestral home.
The Islamic imperialistic expansion was pretty extreme.Comparing that to the White men colonizing the plains of America, with which they have no connection at all culturally or historically, is outlandish to the extreme.
No. The DNA shows that they both have equal claim. I do not see how you can deny it.No it doesn't. The wave of Zionism saw with it the arrival of European Jews who have a much shakier to nonexistent connection with the land contrasted with Palestinians
Indeed. How dare anyone look to history for answers.The tragedy here is that you are trying to detract from this topic, concerning modern day politics of the region, to some morally ambiguous foundational period.
So.... even if I am right, I am wrong? Ah, the nuance.I have a heads up for you, in the event that you are right your argument is meaningless.
Ok, more to the point, I have seen precious little from the "Palestinian" side that counts as serious negotiation. Have they been serious? Did I miss something?I am discussing the settlements in the West Bank that actively undermine all attempts of Palestinian statehood so kindly stick to the point.
It is correct, I merely included Gaza because prior to the withdrawal they did add to the totals.
The breakdown as of 2009 is
304,569[8] in the West Bank
192,000 East Jerusalem
20,000 Golan Heights
Israeli settlement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia