• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Qur'aan Cosmological Model: A delineation of the Origin, Evolution and End of the Universe

al-amiyr

Active Member
Two articles up for debate I wrote for a local newspaper in 1991.I have expanded considerably upon them since that time.

Article One
The Qur’aan Cosmological Model is based upon two verses of The Qur’aan. The Qur’aan is composed of about 6300 verses. These two Qur’aanic verses contain within themselves the plan or cosmological structure and design of the entire universe from before T = 0 (Time was equal to zero) until again when T = 0 (Time will again be Zero) and after.
The two Qur’aanic cosmological verses state as follows;
Qur’aan Chapter 021:030
-that the entire universe i.e. the sun, moon, stars and all other extra-terrestrial phenomena as well as the earth became ‘a singular mass’ in higher dimensional time reversed.
-that ‘the singular mass’ underwent a splitting apart as observed at present time.
Qur’aan Chapter 021:104
-that the universe would continue in its splitting apart phase until it had reached a maximum splitting apart or maximum expansion.
-that the universe would one day again contract and become ‘a singular mass’.
-that ‘the singular mass’ would again undergo a splitting apart to form another universe.
The implications of the analyses of the data derived from the above two Qur’aanic cosmological verses are earthshaking.
Firstly, it took thousands of years, thousands of the most intelligent men and women who ever lived, studying many branches of knowledge to reach the same conclusion as chapter 021:030 of The Qur’aan, the first mentioned cosmological verse that states that the universe was ‘a singular mass’ which then split apart.
Secondly, this was contained in Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity which he published in 1916, soon afterwards explained by Alexander Friedman in 1922 and later verified by Edwin Hubble in 1929, when he was commissioned to search the depth of the universe through the most advanced scientific instrument at the time, the newly built one hundred inch diameter Mount Wilson Telescope.
Humanity’s knowledge about the universe was drastically changed at Hubble’s discovery and set her thinking on a completely different path. The world thought and to this date still thinks that it was a new discovery, but within the Qur’aan the statement laid dormant for thirteen hundred years. Up to that date not even the greatest Muslim scholars of The Qur’aan fathomed its meaning. Even to this date [1991, the Era of The space Telescope] very few are aware of it.
News Newspaper June 1991
Article Two
Profoundly more thought provoking of the two Qur’aanic verses is the fathoming of verse 021:104.The analysis of this verse indicates that the universe in its vertical evolution, since the time of its primordial distention has not yet reached maximum expansion. It is also further adduced via inference and allusion that the universe in its horizontal evolution has not yet reached maximum expansion limitation.
It also categorically asserts that the universe would eventually start a phase of contraction. Thus having reached the singular mass stage again would it split apart as expressed in verse 021:030.
The above data derived from the Qur’aan are not only astounding but as has been said before also earthshaking. The analyses of the data answer many questions that have puzzled and are still puzzling the minds of the greatest scientists of the twentieth century.
For example, cosmologists would like to know what the deceleration parameter of the universe is. From the highest present level of knowledge is it;
q < ½
q = ½
q > ½
(q = deceleration parameter)
According to the models of Albert Einstein, Stephen Hawking and other cosmologists it is q = ½. According to Fred Hoyle and others who support the static universe concept it is q = -1.Yet others have described a universe that makes q = 0. According to another group it is q > ½. The Qur&#8217;aan Cosmological Model delineates it q > ½.
The preponderance of the evidence at present indicates that the universe is open (q < ½).The Hubble Space Telescope and other advanced scientific instruments being built will through much light upon these matters. We would probably in the next ten years know what the deceleration parameter of the universe is. Until then, we must all await the outcome of the evidence. As far as self-assertion is concerned, the Qur&#8217;aan is the only scientific document that categorically asserts the correctness of its delineation i.e. that the deceleration parameter of the universe is q > ½ .Others have not bound themselves in this way as yet in whichever way.
To back up its statement the Qur&#8217;aan challenges the five billion three hundred and fifty million people on earth to investigate more than one hundred branches of knowledge. After having done so, the Qur&#8217;aan continues, &#8220;then humanity will reach the same conclusion&#8221;. It then wants to know from humanity why they will not accept its being the Truth- that it is knowledge of ALLAAH (God), the Evolver of existence, that was revealed via the brain of an illiterate man whose lecturing and teaching thereof then revolutionized and overturned the religious, political, economical, sociological and military systems of the world within a few years about one thousand four hundred years ago.
News Newspaper July 1991

Continued in post #4
.
 
Last edited:

otokage007

Well-Known Member
Saying "the universe was a mass that splitted apart" without any evidence and just because u simply imagine it went that way, doesn't make u a genious of any kind. It's a different thing if Einstein or whoever, by understanding physics, reach that conclusion <- That is genious, the other is not.
 

freethinker44

Well-Known Member
STILL remain unimpressed.

I mean, honestly, this is getting kind of old. A couple cryptic verses from your holy book that sort of say something scientific if you try really, really hard to make them, frankly, it's lame. If science is that important in your religion, then why not get rid of your extremely out-dated religious book and just pick up a science book. You don't have to force a science text to explain scientific things, they do that automatically. It comes pre-interpreted for you, no reinterpretation necessary. And you will learn a lot more too.
 

al-amiyr

Active Member
[FONT=&quot]That ends the two quoted articles I wrote about the Qur’aan Cosmological Model just over twenty years ago. If I had written it today I would probably have written it a little different. Nevertheless it serves its purpose here as an introduction to what the Qur’aan Cosmological Model is.

[/FONT][FONT=&quot] So in more detail, what is the Qur’aan Cosmological Model?

[/FONT] The Qur’aan Cosmological model is a mathematical and graphical presentation of the origin, evolution, and ultimate fate of the universe as it is contained in just two verses of the Qur’aan. These two verses provide us with the key words that describe the general evolution of the universe.
Kh alqan = Tayyan +Ratqan +Fatqan +2Tayyan +2Ratqan +2Fatqan.
C reation = Turn in +Rotate + Fire out +2Turn in +2Rotate +2Fire out.
The initial letters of these key words produce the following algorithmic compression;
Kh = T +R +F +2T +2R +2F
Arabic is a language based on what we call root letters. From these root letters the entire language is built up. They are all consonants which are formed into patterns of two’s three’s or four’s. The Arabic language has 28 consonants and a special letter we call laam ‘alif. There are also only three vowels and vowel signs in the language which can be either short or long and when used are written either above or below the consonants to produce the words and in this case the root letters which are all verbs in the third person past tense. Don’t worry about all the details at this stage because they will all be wonderfully and easily explained further on and then everything will be easily understood.
It will be seen that when we run the Qur’aanic cosmological algorithmic compression
Kh = T +R +F +2T +2R +2F
through the fundamental structure of the Arabic language then we witness a magnificent display of verbs, nouns, and adjectives that go back to describe each and every phase of the universe at its exact time and place in great detail. We are presented without exaggeration hundreds of beautiful drawings of the phases the universe undergoes from its cosmological origin, through its cosmological evolution, and until its eventual cosmological fate. And upon that we also see the derivation of many simple and logical abbreviations that precisely describe each and every phase of the universe. And then further beyond that we realize and see how the actions of the universe drive life into the dead and empty of meaning fundamental building blocks of the language- which are all the fundamental verbal patterns from which are derived the words of the language.
That in a nutshell is the Qur’aan Cosmological Model. We can go into great detail inshaa allaah.
 

Reptillian

Hamburgler Extraordinaire
What scientific predictions does the Qur'aan make that scientists haven't discovered yet? I mean, if only the scientists in the 1800's had known about these verses, they could have advanced our knowledge of the universe so much earlier than they did. In fact, maybe scientists should look to the Qur'aan and pray for divine guidance instead of actually making observations and performing experiments...think of all the time they could save and advancements they could make.
 

otokage007

Well-Known Member
What scientific predictions does the Qur'aan make that scientists haven't discovered yet? I mean, if only the scientists in the 1800's had known about these verses, they could have advanced our knowledge of the universe so much earlier than they did. In fact, maybe scientists should look to the Qur'aan and pray for divine guidance instead of actually making observations and performing experiments...think of all the time they could save and advancements they could make.

They would also save money, and their souls :)
 

al-amiyr

Active Member
What scientific predictions does the Qur'aan make that scientists haven't discovered yet? I mean, if only the scientists in the 1800's had known about these verses, they could have advanced our knowledge of the universe so much earlier than they did. In fact, maybe scientists should look to the Qur'aan and pray for divine guidance instead of actually making observations and performing experiments...think of all the time they could save and advancements they could make.
They did not look into the Qur'aan at that time so they failed to see. Then they made discoveries and then they began to think that it was new but it was not true because it was already contained clearly in the Qur'aan.
Just like Einstein's General Theory of Relativity of 1916 which predicted an expanding Universe and he, the great man, could not see it himself so scholars of the Qur'aan found themselves in the same situation. They also did not clearly see it. And just like Einstein gave a different interpretation of the theory he himself presented to the world and it proved to be to be incorrect so scholars of the Qur'aan did the same thing i.e. misinterpreted it.
And just as Alexander Friedman afterwards in 1922 gave a better understanding of Einstein's own theory so there were also non-Muslim scholars who have given better understandings of what the Qur'aan actually said about the universe before they made the discovery. And just as Einstein's Theory was vindicated in 1929 when Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe was expanding, so the Qur'aan also became vindicated. But they gave the credit to Einstein's Theory but in reality they should have given it to the Qur'aan which already contained the information 1300 years earlier. But because of prejudice, ignorance and the same old human habit of not giving credit where it belongs, many would not even think to consider it even if they knew about it.
And that is why so many of you have become totally deceived. No offense to anybody.
The Qur'aan contains great amount of information that scientists are still trying hard to find out. We shall present them as the need arises.
 

Reptillian

Hamburgler Extraordinaire
Einstein's theory predicted the expansion of the universe, but he didn't want to believe it, so he modified the theory. Are you saying that the Qur'aan makes predictions, but that the scholars of the Qur'aan don't want to believe them, so they ignore them?

If a fortune teller could only predict things after they happen, I think you'd agree with me that he's a pretty bad fortune teller.
 

al-amiyr

Active Member
Einstein's theory predicted the expansion of the universe, but he didn't want to believe it, so he modified the theory. Are you saying that the Qur'aan makes predictions, but that the scholars of the Qur'aan don't want to believe them, so they ignore them?

If a fortune teller could only predict things after they happen, I think you'd agree with me that he's a pretty bad fortune teller.
The fact of the matter is Einstein was wrong on the matter. He did not predict the expansion of the universe. don't believe in fairy tails.

"Are you saying that the Qur'aan makes predictions, but that the scholars of the Qur'aan don't want to believe them, so they ignore them? "
Yes the Qur'aan makes predictions but the scholars of the Qur'aan did the very same thing Einstein did. They could not conceive the possibility of the scenario although it is a thousand times clearer than Einstein wrote it. There was nothing sinister on their part as there was nothing sinister on Einsteins part.
 

Reptillian

Hamburgler Extraordinaire
"Are you saying that the Qur'aan makes predictions, but that the scholars of the Qur'aan don't want to believe them, so they ignore them? "
Yes the Qur'aan makes predictions but the scholars of the Qur'aan did the very same thing Einstein did. They could not conceive the possibility of the scenario although it is a thousand times clearer than Einstein wrote it. There was nothing sinister on their part as there was nothing sinister on Einsteins part.

Einstein looked back on his failure to accept his theory's prediction of the expansion of the universe as the biggest mistake of his career. Do Qur'aan scholars do the same? Do they see their willingness to not accept scripture as a mistake? If so, why don't they embrace the predictions of the Qur'aan, make observations, and become world famous scientists? Why aren't the world's greatest scientists also Muslim theologians?
 

al-amiyr

Active Member
Einstein looked back on his failure to accept his theory's prediction of the expansion of the universe as the biggest mistake of his career. Do Qur'aan scholars do the same? Do they see their willingness to not accept scripture as a mistake? If so, why don't they embrace the predictions of the Qur'aan, make observations, and become world famous scientists? Why aren't the world's greatest scientists also Muslim theologians?
Just tell me one thing,"Why do you guys like to twist things around?" Just look at your statement!
Einstein looked back on his failure to accept his theory's prediction of the expansion of the universe as the biggest mistake of his career.

Now why must scholars of the Qur'aan look at the Qur'aan as a mistake when they made a mistake in interpreting the Qur'aan. What has that got to do with the Qur'aan. Yes the scholars of the Qur'aan have always acknowledge their mistakes.

Did Einstein reject his theory because he made a mistake in the interpretation?
By the logic you have implemented here Einstein should have rejected his theory because of his misinterpretation.
Why don't you just discuss those two Qur'aanic verses I have presented and then see if there is anything wrong with them? That is but a dot of how deep it goes in just those two verses alone.
 
Top