I said hardly. Which is true. Movies amd TV never have been a bastion of good art.
It all depends upon what one thinks is "good".
No art form has greatness more than a small
fraction (IMO). Most opera sucks, most paintings
are uninteresting, most books are boring, etc.
There are some very great amd excellent shows, it's true, but the screen amd film world is best summed up as when Ricky Gervais hosted the Golden Globes; lots of dumb, boring, mindless, stupid blah with not that much that's actually worth watching. All these endless rebootsz remakes, and sequals decades after the fact just helps to highlight the problem of creativity being a rare commodity in Hollywood (that's because it's the city of the pudding brains, by the pudding brains and for the pudding brains).
Remember that vaunted "The Maltese Falcon" is a re-make
of a movie based on a book. And sequels are no more likely
to be as good as the original than the original was likely to
be good in the 1st place. They can succeed when there is
great writing & a continuation of the story with expansion
& novelty, eg, Alien, The Godfather, The Terminator.