fatima_bintu_islam
Active Member
clearly showing their inferiority complex and jealousy against our once-agnostic secular government
This end it all, we're jealous thank you for reminding us.
Have a nice day
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
clearly showing their inferiority complex and jealousy against our once-agnostic secular government
no, I'M saying that those who blame America for Mubarak, or for their woes in general give us too much credit...believing themselves inferior to us, when they are equal.This end it all, we're jealous thank you for reminding us.
Have a nice day
This article gives a reasonable idea of the MB:
The Muslim Brotherhood's US Network » Current Trends in Islamist Ideology
Most Americans are very surprised to hear anger directed at them from Egypt and the Egyptian people, whom we've long considered affectionately as our allies.
Just as the Egyptian people have had little or no say in where or how US aid has been spent in their country, the American people have had precious little say in how it's been spent either.
There's no need to ratchet up the rhetoric between two countries who have a long history of tolerance and mutual respect toward each other.
We are not Egypt's enemy.
Another opinion piece by a right wing think tank? Bloody hell, this is difficult work.
I can't be bothered to read this kind of thing. What I look for in any source is objectivity, clear and lucid reasoning and a transparent, verifiable basis on scads of empirical evidence. No individual or organization working to advance a particular political or economic agenda has thus far proven capable of delivering on any of these requirements.
I feel the same weary apathy for this article as I did for the one in the New Statesman: light on facts, vague on references, heavy on persuasive language such as insinuation, assuming conclusions, straw-men, emotional appeal, prejudicial adjectives, etc. The writers may be working to advance different political agendas (one of which I agree with, the other of which I don't) but neither has the ability to write lucidly and convincingly on the topic of Islam. They are blinded by their convictions.
"She?" Are you talking about Hillary Clinton(who is the Secretary of State) or Joe Biden(who is the Vice President)?I just watched your vice President on the BBC,She said the US Government have been asking for reform in Egypt for years,i think Mubarak is going to jump anytime soon what comes next is going to be interesting.
"She?" Are you talking about Hillary Clinton(who is the Secretary of State) or Joe Biden(who is the Vice President)?
me said:Here is what I have an issue with.
"And we saw that same desire to be free in Tunisia, where the will of the people proved more powerful than the writ of a dictator. And tonight, let us be clear: The United States of America stands with the people of Tunisia, and supports the democratic aspirations of all people."
Our dear President on freedom in the Middle East. Now where is that kind of statement for Egyptians?
The U.S has much leverage on the U.S, as is the case the 1.3 billion dollars that are now used to beat, torture, and kill protesters in Egypt. You think that isn't important to Egypt?
More U.S money is used to fund the Army and less for civil reform Quote:
Total bilateral funding for democracy and governance programming was reduced from approximately $50 million annually to only $20 million. Within this amount, the level of funding for civil society was cut disproportionately, from $32 million to only $7 million, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) adopted a policy of only funding those organizations officially registered and approved as NGOs by the Egyptian government. Moreover, the administration began negotiations on the possible establishment of an endowment, a fund advocated by the Egyptian government to remove Congressional oversight over future U.S. economic aid.
http://www.carnegieendowment.org/arb...&article=40530
For God's sake make good on one promise and take a firm stance on Egypt, instead of putting Israel first as always.
And when I say 1.3 billion dollars I mean all 1.3 billion dollars used to kill and oppress these poor Egyptians.
Quote:
As for U.S. security and military aid to Egypt, which is about $1.3 billion annually, it does not aim to strengthen Egyptian military power against any external threat, as this would be contrary to the declared U.S. objective of ensuring Israeli security and maintaining Israeli military supremacy over its Arab neighbors, including Egypt. Instead, this aid is devoted mainly to strengthening the regimes domestic security and its ability to confront popular movements.
LOL That's ok. There has been debate, for the past two years, as to what her position in our government should have been.Doh! my bad,Hilary Clinton,sleepy head made a mistake
LOL That's ok. There has been debate, for the past two years, as to what her position in our government should have been.
I just watched your vice President on the BBC,She said the US Government have been asking for reform in Egypt for years,i think Mubarak is going to jump anytime soon what comes next is going to be interesting.
However, considering its actions in the Egyptian parliament since 2005, it appears that those skeptics misjudged the movement's scope. In an article for the Middle East Report Samer Shehata from Georgetown University and Joshua Stacher from the British University in Egypt claim that, in fact, it was the Muslim Brotherhood that revived a parliament that till then had "a reputation for being a rubber stamp for the regime" .[40] First of all, according to their observations, the movement did not simply "focus on banning books and legislating the length of skirts" .[41] Instead, the movement's involvement shows attempts to reform the political system. Unlike other MPs, those associated with the Brotherhood took their parliamentary duties very seriously as an "unmatched record of attendance" [40] already shows. Moreover, they also took their role as members of the opposition to the ruling NDP quite seriously. A significant example is the creation of a considerable opposition to the extension of the emergency law when MPs associated with the Brotherhood "formed a coalition with other opposition legislators and with sympathetic members of the NDP, to protest the extension" .[38] The overall involvement leads Shehata and Stacher to the conclusion that the Brotherhood has convincingly attempted to transform "the Egyptian parliament into a real legislative body, as well as an institution that represents citizens and a mechanism that keeps government accountable".[40]
I doubt you would agree but i think she should have been the President
Kathryn the health of the Egyptian improved? These protests were kindled by the stagnant economy which left half of its 80 million under the poverty line of 2 dollars a day.US and Western foreign aid has dramatically changed Egypt for the better in many, many ways. As we can see by this weeks' events, forcing radical change is volatile, uncertain, dangerous, and unpredictable. As long as Mubarak made promises, and the health of his country's people continued to improve, "little things" like democracy and reform were easy to excuse or hope for without showboating and getting radical with demands.