I am sorry that Israel's existence bothers you so
It does not, I have no idea why you assumed otherwise.
Its political environment and its consequences, however, I find very troublesome indeed.
What purpose does Brazil serve? Is there a reason for it's existence?
Not really. I actively campaign for its fracturing, in fact.
What has it contributed to the world?
Little that would not happen without it, arguably better. Why do you ask?
It certainly shouldn't have a military.
Of course. No country should aim to keep a military. It is a matter of basic decency.
Your post is utterly absurd.
If you say so.
Israel is surrounding by arab dictators that want to destroy Israel because it exists.
So it seems. One has to consider that, and it does not automatically follow that such a goal as to keep it existing is worth the trouble.
They have no choice but to use it's military for it's survival.
Even if that point were a given (it is not far as I can tell), there is still a lot to question about the way it has been done. I have not forgotten about that fleet, for instance.
A good chunk of the arab countries are in still a technical state of war with Israel. These countries are not democracies, they are dictatorships, that need Israel as a scapegoat to keep their inhabitants focused on hatred on jews rather than the mismanagement of their own governments.
I largely agree. Do you think it follows that keeping that scapegoat in existence is a worthy goal?
I don't think that is what you meant, but it
does seem to be the logical conclusion.
Israel is the only democracy in the middle east.
If democracy involves a permanent situation of warfare and military mobilization, then it must be wildly over-rated.
It's the historic homeland of the jews,
Even today that is questionable at the very best.
It does not seem to be even a particularly good place for the Jewish people to live, despite having been created with just such a goal.
How historical a homeland can it be, when even your own tradition makes a point of emphasizing that you have largely been absent from it?
It sure seems to me that you take this concept of historical homeland
far more seriously than anyone should.
and was a magnet to the jews, because most of the european and asian countries were very hostile toward the jews and didn't want them.
There is no denying that. It does not follow that aiming to be an autonomous yet permanently troubled people is a solution, much less a worthy goal.
Also, one has to wonder if the conditions that made that hostility so real and serious centuries ago still exist, and whether they are helped or hindered by the concept and the reality of a Jewish State.
You obviously consider such a State important to the safety and perhaps the dignity of the Jewish People. Fair enough. I have no duty and little evidence to agree with such a statement, though.
Israel is where a jew can truely be a jew.
Is that so? That is odd at the very least. I usually consider the people to make the places worth living on instead of the other way around.
There is certainly little evidence that the Jewish People who live in the Americas are particularly troubled by that circunstance, at the very least. Quite a few are in stable if not all-out confortable, even prosperous situations. And more power to them for that.
I have a hard time attempting to believe that deep down they want to live in Israel deep down yet somehow have not managed to.
And why should them anyway? Adaptability to different territories and communities is a virtue, not a flaw.