• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Sun revolves the Earth!

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
Ignorance is blissful isn't it?

It's likely that an ignorant person would associate also with greed- for they're both sins.

Judging by your ignorance of statements like "all academia is false", "can only be agreed on by wise sense", and more; your ignorance of the Sun's revolution; your jumping from main topic to sub topics, in effort to win the debate on a hypothetical scenic route; your constant rhetorical questioning, in light of depicting me as the misunderstood one; and your lack of care for anything I say with comments such as "this means nothing to me"- I'm able to judge that your next comment is something inward or against.

I judged that you would ignore my explanation of wisdom for the reason that you'd misunderstand- so I provided an explanation for a misunderstood contexted you.

Wisdom is technical, above one-ism (touched on in the second post), and hard to communicate. You're asking for a lot of data in words that a human mind processes quickly without words. You abuse my wisdom, but I don't care I'm strong willed. You also neglect your own wisdom- you and others need help- whether or not you like it I'm here to help others.

Being wise, I sense a lot more about you than most others...

My judgement ability is one of a kind, truly.
Really, all I see is that you have elevated your own personal and subjective experience, and the "wisdom" you have built for yourself out of it, to a (entirely subjectively on your part) higher position than anyone else's experience or wisdom. Then, in a forum based entirely on words, you snidely ask for others to provide you with subjective sense-experiences that will contradict your wisdom. Finding none offered, you insult everyone else and declare yourself the winner.

Not an effective strategy if you really are here to "help others."

I find that your expressions of your wisdom do not communicate your experiences/ideas very well, and I wonder why you put so much effort into writing your "theories" when you can't even clearly say what it is you have experienced or are wanting others to communicate to you.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
I've told you several times. Astronomy. We have instruments that tell us the orbital paths of bodies. You keep ignoring this answer, so I'm done with you.

We have our minds as well.

May i ask you a simple question.
Does Jupiter orbit Mars or the sun?
 

s13ep

42
@s13ep, I've sort of gone past the point when I think you are joking or trolling, and accept that you are actually being quite sincere in what you are saying. I'm trying to understand "how" you reached the conclusion. I am simplifying here but let me know if I am following your argument correctly;

Academia asserts certian things as fact, but this is "false" in that it is based exclusively on the authority of academics. Therefore Academics cannot be trusted as a reliable source of knowledge. So, in rejecting Academics as a source of knowledge, you come to rely on your own sense-data. Hence, you see the Sun move through the sky and assert that the Sun revolves around the earth.

Quad Helix is not one, but many natures; by Quad Helix logic, the number “1” is a false number, and constitutes to religious-one-ism.

For example, if we take an apple, and dissect it multiple times, we're left with fractions, meaning that an apple is formed out of multiple natures; it's above the number “1”.

Let's examine “1” as a concept; but we cannot examine “1”. We can understand it's attributes, and say that it's, inter alia, 'solitary' and 'singular', but not observe “1” logically, for that would void it's attributes.

A physical “1” is theoretically, a single, solitary point; if we assume an observer, we assume falsity, for the observer is an addition that voids it's single and solitary nature. “1” becomes “2”. “1” cannot be observed, and is not observed- the only truthful physical “1” is non-existent.

Further analysis of the truthful physical “1”: “1” is opposite to “-1”; they are at opposite polarities. The only value of “1” is the opposite-integrity with “-1”.

Therefore, the concept of “1” is falsity.

One-ism is equal to death-worship, and false mathematics that leads to a false reality.

To delude ourselves into one-ism, we first name an object with “1”, and then we use the named-object and call this utility a factor of “1”, that becomes the used-named object, the opposite polarity “-1” named “1”.

We treat the used-named object as evidence of “1” by ignorant-utility of the correct “-1”. We are deluded into ongoing faith with the used-named object as “1”- this is one-ism.

One-ism has evolved by way of mutation.

There're mutations in one-ism; the used-named object becomes, inter alia, “results”, “facts” and “truths”, but in the beginning it was, inter alia, “magic”, “tricks” and “rituals”.

The mutations are then worshipped as “1”, and it helps to create “1”-reality.

The side-effects of one-ism are numerous, ironically: word-communication; common idiocy when wordlessness is suggested; pursuit of extinction; perversion of the course of justice; maleficent technological advancement; planetary-nihilism; ignorance of crucial subjects; general stupidity and confusion; depression and suicidal word-thoughts; false experts and false prophets; false laws and false law enforcement; word-related stress and angst; religion based on “1” or one-ism; diagnoses of non-existent mental conditions; manipulation of passive-aggression; large scale wars; radical racial integration; self-neglect of wisdom and cruelty to the wise; and more.

Mathematicians and scientists who incorporate “1” into their profession, religiously, are one-ists; the entire academic body of knowledge- which is more properly referred to as a long-transcript of “1”- is falsity. One-ism-academia is an unwarranted, consistent illusion, that deludes it's subjects into submission; those subjects who don't submit are endangered or discriminated by false experts and false prophets.

It's common for a conspiracy theorist that's declared by scholarly persons as a 'crackpot', to produce a more accurate knowledge of truth, and to promote a greater good, but unknowingly. The conspiracy theorist's conscience in comparison the academic-conscience, mean the conspiracy theorist is likely to provide a more righteous sense of truth, that which is anti-one-ism, especially in the face of adversity.

The concept of evil, as 'one-ism', and good, as 'anti-one-ism', is a legitimate concept, it makes sense only in “1”-reality, but is beneficent wisdom. Had we transcended the “1”-hierarchical stasis, 'evil', like “1”, would be non-existent. It's probable that the good, referred to from a “1”-reality, would outweigh evil, referring to “1”-reality.

For example, the pursuit of extinction from a single human in good circumstances, would mean that the human would have to control a very high number of other humans, and delude them into believing in the death of themselves, and their children; contesting love, probability, and other good.

In the present, “1”-reality overwhelms humanity, and the logical tables have turned. It's probable that we will cause our own extinction, and for people to believe in death, of themselves and their children; this is due prolonged one-ism, the adoration for one-ism, and the perversion of good.

The academicians in seats of power, suppress any mutation in “1”-reality that is against their long-transcript of “1”. This makes it difficult to prevent evil events from occurring, and almost impossible to prove that evil exists, as the majority of human-kind have an intelligence of “1”; good is handicapped into comparison to the evil that is advantaged. The tactics to suppress mutations include; using numbers of people and variant encores; perversion of the mutation's word-communication; writing laws that discriminates a determinable mutation; isolation; physical abuse of power; and further tactics.

Quoted from: http://www.debate.org/debates/All-Academia-is-False/1/

There are numerous reasons why academia is falsity.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
I love a good comedy thread. So, when will this be moved to the appropriate sub-forum? Everyone wanting a good laugh should know easily where to find this gem. It truly is brilliant comedy.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
I love a good comedy thread. So, when will this be moved to the appropriate sub-forum? Everyone wanting a good laugh should know easily where to find this gem. It truly is brilliant comedy.
Sadly, Lady Draka, it is neither brilliant or particularly good comedy. But yes, it should be moved to the joke section.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
Sadly, Lady Draka, it is neither brilliant or particularly good comedy. But yes, it should be moved to the joke section.
I don't know, I laughed quite a bit. It's kind of slapstick in a way. Different kind of comedy. One of those things that's just so stupid you can't help but laugh. You know...like those "fail" videos you find on YouTube?
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
I don't know, I laughed quite a bit. It's kind of slapstick in a way. Different kind of comedy. One of those things that's just so stupid you can't help but laugh. You know...like those "fail" videos you find on YouTube?
Oh, I hear ya, Draka. I hear ya. :)
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
This. This is what this is like. The whole premise of this thread is this:
Ain't it the truth?

Seriously though, I am intrigued about what form of mental illness compels individuals to spout this kind of epic drivel, with the expectation that people will find it compelling.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
The only one's laughing are the academicians, still not a contradiction.
You don't really intend people to take this joke seriously do you? How?

I mean, is your next thread going to be something along the lines of claiming that since we know water is wet, and the ocean is water and it is blue, that they sky must be wet too as it is blue. I mean, we can see that the ocean is blue and it is wet, so by your observation method we should deduce that the sky is wet. Or water itself right. I mean, sometimes water does fall from the sky. Hey! that's it! I've observed that the ocean is blue and the sky is blue and water falls from the sky so...the sky must be water! Fantastic! Your observation method just opened up a profound piece of information. Yay. :rolleyes:
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
You don't really intend people to take this joke seriously do you? How?

I mean, is your next thread going to be something along the lines of claiming that since we know water is wet, and the ocean is water and it is blue, that they sky must be wet too as it is blue. I mean, we can see that the ocean is blue and it is wet, so by your observation method we should deduce that the sky is wet. Or water itself right. I mean, sometimes water does fall from the sky. Hey! that's it! I've observed that the ocean is blue and the sky is blue and water falls from the sky so...the sky must be water! Fantastic! Your observation method just opened up a profound piece of information. Yay. :rolleyes:

The water is observed to be colorless.;)
 

beenherebeforeagain

Rogue Animist
Premium Member
Isn't it clear? 1 is a false number; therefore anyone who uses 1 is an academic and therefore wrong. Anyone using words clearly does not understand the wisdom that is being described here, and is therefore an academic and wrong. Simple, really. :confused:o_O:rolleyes:

This is individual subjectiveism being raised to the level of TRUTH.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
You don't really intend people to take this joke seriously do you? How?

I mean, is your next thread going to be something along the lines of claiming that since we know water is wet, and the ocean is water and it is blue, that they sky must be wet too as it is blue. I mean, we can see that the ocean is blue and it is wet, so by your observation method we should deduce that the sky is wet. Or water itself right. I mean, sometimes water does fall from the sky. Hey! that's it! I've observed that the ocean is blue and the sky is blue and water falls from the sky so...the sky must be water! Fantastic! Your observation method just opened up a profound piece of information. Yay. :rolleyes:
As opposed to the incredible feats presented in this video....


I get spooked just watching it. I simply cannot imagine the physical coordination to actually do this or the inherent insanity...
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
The water is observed to be colorless.;)
You cannot contradict this. It has been observed. Why just look at the oceans, they are blue. Like the sky is blue. And at night...the sky turns black...just like the oceans! They change color in the same way! Like chameleons. It's obvious they are the same. It's been observed. You have to agree with me. Because...I b smart.
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
I'll wait for more intellectually-sound responses prior to responding seriously.
You'll notice that, at this point, no one else is responding seriously because you haven't provided anything "intellectually-sound" to respond to. ;)
 

s13ep

42
You cannot contradict this. It has been observed. Why just look at the oceans, they are blue. Like the sky is blue. And at night...the sky turns black...just like the oceans! They change color in the same way! Like chameleons. It's obvious they are the same. It's been observed. You have to agree with me. Because...I b smart.
I'll believe what I see before what you're trying to indoctrinate me with...
 

Draka

Wonder Woman
I'll believe what I see before what you're trying to indoctrinate me with...
smiley-laughing017.gif
smiley-laughing021.gif
 
Top