The Sun revolves the Earth!

[YmirGF]

I'll believe what I see before what you're trying to indoctrinate me with...

So, please tell us, what form(s) of mental illness have you been diagnosed having?

 

[FearGod]

I'll believe what I see before what you're trying to indoctrinate me with...

Do you need to see Bacteria to know that it does exist?

 

[s13ep]

Is that so, then why has no-one contradicted "the Sun's perceived revolution is as significant as the Earth's revolution rotation where days are concerned"?

Strikethrough is correcting a grammatical error.

You'll notice that, at this point, no one else is responding seriously because you haven't provided anything "intellectually-sound" to respond to.

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

I'll wait for more intellectually-sound responses prior to responding seriously.

Oh, you want "intellectually-sound" responses, but deny everything anyone else says as "academic" falsehood?

Do you think you are the only person to have opened themselves to sense-experience, such as you described earlier with the sun? I, too, have experienced the sun, and I realized that there are basically two possibilities: the sun revolves around the earth, or the earth rotates in relation to the sun. I have also experienced the moon, the movement of the visible planets and stars, as well as the weather, and other atmospheric and celestial phenomena. After digesting all that experience, I came to the conclusion that the sun and the stars, for all day-to-day intents and purposes, stay in one place, while the earth rotates on its axis, the moon revolves around the earth, and the planets and the earth/moon system revolve around the sun.

And, I find that others--"academics" as you have it, but it really includes people who have very practical, pragmatic reasons for adopting the same understanding of the observed phenomena--share my wisdom about the world. And it's not the same as your wisdom.

 

[s13ep]

Do you need to see Bacteria to know that it does exist?

The comment was partial; in response to insulting behaviour.

You'll need to sense it to acknowledge it, yes whether that be by evidence, such as illness, or general observation through a microscope.

 

[Draka]

Is that so, then why has no-one contradicted "the Sun's perceived revolution is as significant as the Earth's revolution rotation where days are concerned"?

Strikethrough is correcting a grammatical error.

You have been contradicted, many times. Oh, and your "grammatical error" does change what you are arguing about in the first place. You know that right?

It is the path of the Sun across the sky as the Earth rotates that may give us time approximations and seasonal differences, but it still doesn't actually mean that the Sun revolves around the Earth. It just speaks to our rotation and our approximate place upon our orbit around the Sun.

 

[s13ep]

You have been contradicted, many times. Oh, and your "grammatical error" does change what you are arguing about in the first place. You know that right?

It is the path of the Sun across the sky as the Earth rotates that may give us time approximations and seasonal differences, but it still doesn't actually mean that the Sun revolves around the Earth. It just speaks to our rotation and our approximate place upon our orbit around the Sun.

This, again, isn't a contradiction.

Point out a contradiction in the thread

This is a sub-argument of the original.

 

[FearGod]

The comment was partial; in response to insulting behaviour.

You'll need to sense it to acknowledge it, yes whether that be by evidence, such as illness, or general observation through a microscope.

But why you're against Academia? without it how could we know about bacteria and other things as well?

 

[Draka]

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

Is that so, then why has no-one contradicted "the Sun's perceived revolution is as significant as the Earth's revolution rotation where days are concerned"?

Strikethrough is correcting a grammatical error.

So, 123 posts in, you realize that you put the wrong word in your OP. Doesn't matter, the perceived motion is not what actually happens--it is not the truth, even though for day-to-day purposes it works well enough--in fact, it's trivial enough that most people simply accept that the earth really rotates, but we speak as if the sun moves. But for seasonal and yearly periods and beyond, it doesn't work at all. So why is it so important that someone "contradict" you? How does your day-to-day "perceived revolution is as significant as the earth's rotation" disprove all academia?

Again, that you perceive it as sun's motion each day, that's fine, I guess, for you. But it does not correspond to the way the world actually is...which is the way I've experienced it by perceiving the exact same things as you, but understanding them in a way that corresponds to reality.

 

[s13ep]

We would adapt to illness rather than suppressing it in individuals.

We all go extinct by academia...

There are countless reasons, but to understand the logic, you'll have to read my Quad Helix theory. I can PM you if you like?!

But why you're against Academia? without it how could we know about bacteria and other things as well?

 

[s13ep]

So, 123 posts in, you realize that you put the wrong word in your OP. Doesn't matter, the perceived motion is not what actually happens--it is not the truth, even though for day-to-day purposes it works well enough--in fact, it's trivial enough that most people simply accept that the earth really rotates, but we speak as if the sun moves. But for seasonal and yearly periods and beyond, it doesn't work at all. So why is it so important that someone "contradict" you? How does your day-to-day "perceived revolution is as significant as the earth's rotation" disprove all academia?

Again, that you perceive it as sun's motion each day, that's fine, I guess, for you. But it does not correspond to the way the world actually is...which is the way I've experienced it by perceiving the exact same things as you, but understanding them in a way that corresponds to reality.

I didn't put the wrong word in the OP

In further posts in sub arguments I said the wrong words.

 

[Draka]

We would adapt to illness rather than suppressing it in individuals.

Yeah, cause we "adapted" real well to smallpox and polio and measles and are sure doing a bang up job of "adapting" to AIDS and cancer. Yeah. Just awesome job "adapting". Hell with treatments and vaccines and cures scientists make. Who needs them? Scientists provide no benefit. Perhaps we should just return to leeches and exorcisms as our illness treatments.

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

I didn't put the wrong word in the OP

In further posts in sub arguments I said the wrong words.

Here is exactly what you said in the OP; you kept repeating the wrong words, and not correcting them, even though most everyone else had pointed out the error to you:

Contrary to popular and academic belief, the Sun revolves the Earth, as well as, the Earth revolving the Sun.

The Sun is percieved in the day revolving the Earth; this Earthly sight is as significant as, the spatial sight of the Earth revolving the Sun.

You did not say that the earth rotates, and you did not specify that you were talking about perception of the day.

 

[s13ep]

I have no need to mention it's perception to appeal to a less intellectual audience; and the original post stands, except we're in a sub-argument that focuses on rotation and the day.

I have claimed the Sun's revolution is equally as significant as Earth's rotation in this sub-argument.

In the original post I've claimed that the Sun and Earth revolve each other; which is my main argument.

Here is exactly what you said in the OP; you kept repeating the wrong words, and not correcting them, even though most everyone else had pointed out the error to you:

You did not say that the earth rotates, and you did not specify that you were talking about perception of the day.

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

Well, I've had enough of this entertainment...

 

[Draka]

I have no need to mention it's perception to appeal to a less intellectual audience; and the original post stands, except we're in a sub-argument that focuses on rotation and the day.

I have claimed the Sun's revolution is equally as significant as Earth's rotation in this sub-argument.

In the original post I've claimed that the Sun and Earth revolve each other; which is my main argument.

But the Sun and the Earth do not revolve each other. The Earth revolves around the Sun and the Earth rotates, but the Sun doesn't go around the Earth. If that is your main argument then it is extremely flawed at the get go.

 

[s13ep]

More academic behaviour.

 

[s13ep]

But the Sun and the Earth do not revolve each other. The Earth revolves around the Sun and the Earth rotates, but the Sun doesn't go around the Earth. If that is your main argument then it is extremely flawed at the get go.

It's perceived to revolve the Earth daily.

 

[Draka]

More academic behaviour.

Have you graduated high school yet? If so, then I'd suggest that your school failed you badly and to go back to a different high school.