• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Sun revolves the Earth!

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
Good judgement, experience and knowledge.

On what grounds do you make that judgment, and how do you judge it good?
What experiences have you had with me that give you enough knowledge about me that you can make such a statement about what I expect?

No one has contradicted the original post.

There's nothing substantive to contradict in the original post. Just a claim with no support provided.
 
Last edited:

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
Tyco died by a led filled fake nose, and tychonian geocentricity died by Kepler's math.

But I wish I had lived at that time and seen the beer drunk moose.
 

s13ep

42
Ignorance is blissful isn't it?

It's likely that an ignorant person would associate also with greed- for they're both sins.

Judging by your ignorance of statements like "all academia is false", "can only be agreed on by wise sense", and more; your ignorance of the Sun's revolution; your jumping from main topic to sub topics, in effort to win the debate on a hypothetical scenic route; your constant rhetorical questioning, in light of depicting me as the misunderstood one; and your lack of care for anything I say with comments such as "this means nothing to me"- I'm able to judge that your next comment is something inward or against.

I judged that you would ignore my explanation of wisdom for the reason that you'd misunderstand- so I provided an explanation for a misunderstood contexted you.

Wisdom is technical, above one-ism (touched on in the second post), and hard to communicate. You're asking for a lot of data in words that a human mind processes quickly without words. You abuse my wisdom, but I don't care I'm strong willed. You also neglect your own wisdom- you and others need help- whether or not you like it I'm here to help others.

Being wise, I sense a lot more about you than most others...

My judgement ability is one of a kind, truly.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
Being wise, I sense a lot more about you than most others...

Pity that "wisdom" fails to provide any meaningful analysis beyond broad stereotyping.

The truly wise listen and ask questions, while not accepting things at face value. Question all, sure, but to become truly wise, question yourself. Be okay with potentially being wrong.
 

s13ep

42
Pity that "wisdom" fails to provide any meaningful analysis beyond broad stereotyping.

The truly wise listen and ask questions, while not accepting things at face value. Question all, sure, but to become truly wise, question yourself. Be okay with potentially being wrong.
I listen to your heart, and not your word, I ask wordless questions; and I don't see how you can say "don't accept face-value"- then claim you know wise- when you're only reading the face-print of word.

The broad-stereotyping is really a very good character-judgement. If you don't like it, stop asking leading questions!

Anyone want to contradict that the "Sun's revolution is as significant as the Earth's revolution" when it comes to the day? If not, I'm happy calling this thread a victory ; )
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
People thought first that earth was stationary, then found it wrong
People thought next that the sun is stationary, then found it wrong
So what's wrong to keep in thinking, the others made it wrong, and so may we.

v1eC7R.gif
 

Mycroft

Ministry of Serendipity
People thought first that earth was stationary, then found it wrong
People thought next that the sun is stationary, then found it wrong
So what's wrong to keep in thinking, the others made it wrong, and so may we.

I've told you several times. Astronomy. We have instruments that tell us the orbital paths of bodies. You keep ignoring this answer, so I'm done with you.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
To my perspective this thread is fairly clear evidence that one can take creating their own reality too far ....
 

s13ep

42
To my perspective this thread is fairly clear evidence that one can take creating their own reality too far ....
Yeah because the Sun doesn't appear to revolve the Earth in Earth's sky.

This is the behaviour of academician, my friends, and this is another reason why academia is falsity.
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
@s13ep, I've sort of gone past the point when I think you are joking or trolling, and accept that you are actually being quite sincere in what you are saying. I'm trying to understand "how" you reached the conclusion. I am simplifying here but let me know if I am following your argument correctly;

Academia asserts certian things as fact, but this is "false" in that it is based exclusively on the authority of academics. Therefore Academics cannot be trusted as a reliable source of knowledge. So, in rejecting Academics as a source of knowledge, you come to rely on your own sense-data. Hence, you see the Sun move through the sky and assert that the Sun revolves around the earth.
 
Top