outhouse
Atheistically
At least be faithful when you copy from Wikipedia
I posted teh relevant information to the topic at hand.
my reply had to do with Constantines influence, not the origin of the creeds the bishops were not agreed upon
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
At least be faithful when you copy from Wikipedia
I posted teh relevant information to the topic at hand.
my reply had to do with Constantines influence, not the origin of the creeds the bishops were not agreed upon
And according to you.......
1 man influenced 1800 Bishops into error?
You only took one half of the sentence and ignored the other. You should have given the full quote.
You ignored the part about 'Misconceptions'!
Constantine forced a agreement for a unfied church
Misconceptions
The Role of Constantine
While Constantine wanted a unified church after the council for political reasons, he did not force the Homoousian view of Christ's nature on the council, nor commission a Bible at the council that omitted books he did not approve of, although he did later commission Bibles. In fact, Constantine had little theological understanding of the issues at stake, and did not particularly care which view of Christ's nature prevailed so long as it resulted in a unified church. This can be seen in his initial acceptance of the Homoousian view of Christ's nature, only to abandon the belief several years later for political reasons, under the influence of Eusebius of Nicomedia and others.
lol...why ??
Now quoted first from wikipedia?
And who ignored this:
lol...
Read it again and be faithful.
I think your...
You be your own judge.
im glad you conceded that you cannot show a mistake in my reply.
You cannot show Constantine did nit bring all the bishops in
you cannot show the Canstantine did not have a influence in the bishops decision.
because its all in black and white.
The First Council of Nicaea was a council of Christian bishops convened in Nicaea in Bithynia (present-day İznik in Turkey) by the Roman Emperor Constantine I in A.D. 325
it did settle to some degree the debate within the Early Christian communities regarding the divinity of Christ
The First Council of Nicea was convened by Constantine
Constantine had invited all 1800 bishops of the Christian church
Under Constantine's influence
Result of the debate
The Council declared that the Father and the Son are of the same substance and are co-eternal, basing the declaration in the claim that this was a formulation of traditional Christian belief handed down from the Apostles. Under Constantine's influence, this belief was expressed by the bishops in what would be known thereafter as the Nicene Creed.
Misconceptions
The Role of Constantine
While Constantine wanted a unified church after the council for political reasons, he did not force the Homoousian view of Christ's nature on the council, nor commission a Bible at the council that omitted books he did not approve of, although he did later commission Bibles. In fact, Constantine had little theological understanding of the issues at stake, and did not particularly care which view of Christ's nature prevailed so long as it resulted in a unified church. This can be seen in his initial acceptance of the Homoousian view of Christ's nature, only to abandon the belief several years later for political reasons, under the influence of Eusebius of Nicomedia and others.
I'll just put this again, and let people compare to see if your quoting is faithful or not
Constantine was a great emprorer for christians
BUT the bishops were not in agreement in any way shape or form and Constaintine forced a decision on one side, not all of the bishops. Constantine just wanted the bishops to be unified.
It was not the bishops choice at all
but it was the bishops who created the dogma, and then continued to perpetuate the myth even after constantines death, that still divides christians today
they could have refused constantine rather then let a pagan dictate doctrine...but they sided with the devil and for that reason, God disowned them.
disrespectful, biased, useless...heres more proof of "influence"...
this isnt faithful, its history.
...
that there my friend is "INFLUENCE"
If you still can't see how unfaithfully you quoted from Wikipedia, I won't get that low.
The Emperor carried out his earlier statement: everybody who refused to endorse the Creed would be exiled.
Constantine was no Christian, he was a politcal mastermind who sought control of a church that covered a vast area of earth and a lot of people.
the church sold out.