I did like the first season - the deviations were tolerable. But it doesn't make sense to base the series on a successful comic and then go a whole other way. If they thought the idea was good, why didn't they remain at least partially faithful to it?
Now we just have some very basic shadows of characters that connect the two very different story lines -
I think that it's significant that Rick only has one arm in the comic
Lori dies with the baby in an assault on the prison rather than in childbirth
Andrea is a much more powerful character in the book - a sniper, not someone with conflicted loyalties, sleeping with Mr. Gov
Then you have the whole slew of characters who either aren't there or are added
Yeah, Shane dies much earlier than in the TV show. I also was a big fan of Tyreese and a fan of Andrea from the comic. I still need to get caught up, though, yet I know what happens to Glen and Tyreese....
.....and doesn't Andrea and Rick hook up in the comic?
But from the TV show, I love love love Daryl. I understand how different the show is from the comic, but MAN is Daryl a favorite of mine. I'm one of those people who says "If Daryl dies, we riot."
Anyway, I need to get caught up in the comics to compare and contrast better. But for now, at the prison....
I'm quite excited to see what happens in season 4. So far, I'm still hooked.