@Father Heathen - A hit, a most palpable hit! (not really)
Ok, if I misunderstood you, please clarify.
Ok, if I misunderstood you, please clarify.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Or we could just let them **** in peace.
So they would break the law that forbids rape, but abide the law that would forbid them from entering a restroom?And ignore making access easier for rapists? Misogynistic much?
Try it and let us know. Until then its just a "what if" that can be dismissed.There is more to being a man or a woman than just body parts.
I am assuming that you are male. If I am wrong, just reverse the sexes. It we took your brain out of your body and transplanted it into a female one would you now think of yourself as a woman? If you are straight would you suddenly crave penis?
So they would break the law that forbids rape, but abide the law that would forbid them from entering a restroom?
Why hasn't this rape epidemic already happened?
How would these rules be enforced, anyway? Would a genital inspector be placed at the entrance to all restrooms?
What change? Like I've said transgendered people have already been using the restrooms by how they identify. The proposed bans by conservatives is a recent development.How has it been enforced for the last decades? You are proposing a change. To be sure, the current system is not perfect, but your proposed change will make things worse.
Hypotheticals can be used to make valid points. What can be dismissed is your POV.Try it and let us know. Until then its just a "what if" that can be dismissed.
What change? Like I've said transgendered people have already been using the restrooms by how they identify. The proposed bans by conservatives is a recent development.
Show me where this is actually an occurring thing and not outlandish fearmongering. The notion is contradictory and nonsensical.I think what's new-ish is trans women who are not attempting to look like women. Trans women with full beards for example.
No, it is a valid question to those that try to claim that "it is just a feeling". You may not be able to understand that due to personal prejudices.Try it and let us know. Until then its just a "what if" that can be dismissed.
Show me where this is actually an occurring thing and not outlandish fearmongering. The notion is contradictory and nonsensical.
Access isn’t readily denied to rapists using restrooms as a place of attack now and hasn’t been for literally centuries at this point.And ignore making access easier for rapists? Misogynistic much?
Gee, I wonder if icehorse will acknowledge - as they have repeatedly stated to be their position in other threads - that this hard evidence is more important and significant than the feelings and fears of a minority of individuals.Access isn’t readily denied to rapists using restrooms as a place of attack now and hasn’t been for literally centuries at this point.
That’s why in many places women tend to go to the restroom in groups, especially at night. Well they have where I live, anyway.
I have seen passing trans men. Women would flee the restroom if they use the women’s facilities!
Even ignoring all that, recent hysteria surrounding trans people using such facilities has allegedly resulted in cis women being accused irrationally of not using the proper facilities. (Apologies in advance for the links. But I did what I could with such a niche topic.)
That’s not due to trans people, that’s due to irrational fears over trans people.
And it affects non conforming cis people more often than not, allegedly
I couldn’t care less if the person in the next stall is cis or gay or trans or a hermaphrodite.
In the women’s facilities we have closed individual stalls anyway.
Maybe the men should do the same and stop fretting over whats in the pants of the person next to them. Or just ask them out already and put the rest of us out of our misery.
The obsession is real, like omg.
Cis woman harassed by ‘transphobe’ who followed her into female toilet
A viral TikTok video has shown a cisgender woman getting confronted over her gender identity in a public toilet because she had short hair.www.thepinknews.com
Cis Woman Mistaken as Transgender Records Being Berated in Bathroom
She stayed cool, calm, and collected as she recorded a stranger's demand that she identify her gender.www.advocate.com
Found this rather interesting
Transgender teens with restricted bathroom access at higher risk of sexual assault
Transgender and gender-nonbinary teens face greater risk of sexual assault in schools that prevent them from using bathrooms or locker rooms consistent with their gender identity, according to a re…www.hsph.harvard.edu
And just because
No link between trans-inclusive policies and bathroom safety, study finds
There is no evidence that letting transgender people use public facilities that align with their gender identity increases safety risks, a UCLA study finds.www.nbcnews.com
Right there. It demonstrates well the ulterior motive of every Anti-LGBTQ argument.that trans activists are attempting to NORMALIZE people
I’m sure @icehorse is rational enough to accept scientific data and acknowledge that we should place that above irrational fearsGee, I wonder if icehorse will acknowledge - as they have repeatedly stated to be their position in other threads - that this hard evidence is more important and significant than the feelings and fears of a minority of individuals.
Then where is the evidence that the "thing" is happening?One clue to this is the repeated claim that "thing X is not happening"
Access isn’t readily denied to rapists using restrooms as a place of attack now and hasn’t been for literally centuries at this point.
That’s why in many places women tend to go to the restroom in groups, especially at night. Well they have where I live, anyway.
The cognitive dissonance must be positively ear shattering. Wear protective ear protectors dude!Gee, I wonder if icehorse will acknowledge - as they have repeatedly stated to be their position in other threads - that this hard evidence is more important and significant than the feelings and fears of a minority of individuals.
I will add "cognitive dissonance" to the list of things I will educate you about someday.The cognitive dissonance must be positively ear shattering. Wear protective ear protectors dude!