Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Fake Q-anon group.There is a movement in opposition…
Gays Against Groomers
A coalition of gays against the sexualization, indoctrination and medicalization of minors under the guise of "LGBTQIA+"www.gaysagainstgroomers.com
No it's not. It's of the foundation of your entire argument. It IS the context.
So, you're saying a study about the effects of trans-inclusive bathroom policies on the safety of women and the prevalence of sexual assaults in bathrooms is a different topic to the topic of... Women's safety and the likelihood of sexual assaults in public bathrooms that may result from trans-inclusive bathroom policies?
Translation: "Ignore facts if they contradict my beliefs. You should always assume, without basis, that any scientific findings that contradict what I want to believe or what I have claimed must be flawed in some way. That's how you do an anti-dogmatism!"
Okay, if that is the case then disregard it. I’ll check it out further.
I knew about it already. Any time anyone is using "groomers" is suspicious. This is a classic homophobic/transphobic concept and term used to rationalize or justify any and all things opposed to LGBTQ, even when we just want to go outside or to the store. To them, going outside or the store is always "gay" code for grooming, abusing and raping children.
What do we normalize or not?
Okay, I decided to delete that post if that organization is disingenuous or fake.
jbilek.substack.com
Hmmm. The homosexual predatory pedofiles who groomed my friends and I when we were 15 were all about normalizing thngs too. I was groomed to be a supplicating sex toy for men between the ages of 35-55 and felt good about being the centre of attention. I never even thought I was being exploited, they were that good. Forgive me, if I'm not keen of "normalizing" now.
I’d say we should not normalize delusion or detachment from our biological human reality.
Guess what? They were pedophiles. They don't represent the LGBTQ community, myself or decent folk everywhere. They were simply gutless pedophiles.
What does that even mean?
I was with this identity long before any corporation or institution even acknowledged I existed.Okay, I decided to delete that post if that organization is disingenuous or fake.
Nevertheless, I think it’s important to delve into the “transgender” movement a bit deeper and see what’s actually going on.
“The current iteration of this ideology, established by the technocracy we live in, is meant to ensconce us in a virtual or cyber world to which the natural world is subjugated. With its massive propaganda apparatus, it has only taken a decade to convince the populace that there is a unique type of human, untethered to the biosphere like the rest of us, mere “biological people.”
The political left (media and politicians) is helping to manifest this virtual reality driving a narrative of unique, ethereal humans, unattached to the ecosystem & needing special rights within law & society.
The political right (media and politicians) is linguistically supporting this edifice whenever they argue that “transgender women” don’t belong in “biological women’s” sports, prisons, colleges, etc. They solidify the illusion of another type of human that is not biological at every turn. Until the media focuses on tearing down the faulty premise of people outside of the parameters of our sexed reality, this exercise of building a virtual reality for us to live in will only continue to be solidified. The premise of alternate humans must be attacked along with the political lobby fostering the illusion.
Corporations, banks, international investment houses, governments, legal institutions, and influential non-governmental organizations (NGOs) market the idea that we are not a sexually dimorphic species. They don’t care about the identity issues of a minuscule part of the population. It is patently ridiculous to think so. They are marketing disembodiment. “Gender,” currently being promoted as a revolutionary human rights movement to set us free, is an industry posing as social progress for the people. It seeks to deconstruct human reproductive sex for profit and human engineering.”
“Gender Identity”: A Corporate Fiction
There is zero difference between people being called "transgender" & the rest of us, in the sense that we’re all biological & exist as part of a sexually dimorphic species. We're all tethered to reality by our sex.
I don’t know your identity or situation.
You're correct in that they do not represent the LGBlahblahblah so-called "community". Thank you so much for stating the bloody obvious.
If you want a productive debate that requires accurately portraying what people are saying and not misrepresenting them.Calm down @Shadow Wolf , you're involved in a debate. You might not always be rightYour debate opponents are not required to answer every point you make. They are not required to verbatim parrot back everything you've said. These topics are complex. If you put forth an argument along the lines of: Since A is true AND B is true AND C is true, then X, your opponent does not - from a boolean logic perspective - have to answer A and B and C. If ANY of A, B, and C are responded to, that's completely legit from a debating perspective.
carry on
You were abused, and you were abused criminally by pedophiles, who are not LGBTQ+. Pedophilia may well be a mental sickness, but it is one with such serious consequences that these people must be kept away from children simply for the sake of protecting children.