• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The witchhunt continues...

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
If you want a productive debate that requires accurately portraying what people are saying and not misrepresenting them.
And it's not as comolex as you think. Fearing transwomen in the women's restroom is no different than white people being opposed to ending racial segregation for fears black women will prey upon white women. Or, as anither garbage claim US History has seen, Chinese men preying upon white women.

You're demonstrating poor reading skills. No one, not me, not anyone on this thread that I've seen is fearing transwomen in the restroom. Go back, take a breathe, slow down, and read more carefully!
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
What do we normalize or not?

One of the topics being debated in THIS thread is whether it's a good idea to - VERY SPECIFICALLY - normalize people who look like men, using women's restrooms.

This seems like a no-brainer to me, I guess the kool-aid hasn't hit me yet?
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
You were abused, and you were abused criminally by pedophiles, who are not LGBTQ+. Pedophilia may well be a mental sickness, but it is one with such serious consequences that these people must be kept away from children simply for the sake of protecting children.
I do thank you for the sentiment, but you have no idea, at all, if these people were LGBTQ+... I almost get a sense of the No True Scotsman fallacy. News flash. Pedofiles are riddled throughout the so-called "gay community". Pedophilia, from my direct experience, is baked into this so-called "gay community".
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
One of the topics being debated in THIS thread is whether it's a good idea to - VERY SPECIFICALLY - normalize people who look like men, using women's restrooms.

This seems like a no-brainer to me, I guess the kool-aid hasn't hit me yet?
Well, put it that way, and people who look like men (according to you) shouldn't use women's restrooms, but people with body parts more typically associated with women shouldn't use men's restrooms. So let's just agree that trans people are only allowed bathroom priviliges in the privacy of their own homes. In the office, they have to hold it 9-to-5. And the same for people that look like women, but have body parts more typically associated with men. That sounds fair, doesn't it?
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I do thank you for the sentiment, but you have no idea, at all, if these people were LGBTQ+... I almost get a sense of the No True Scotsman fallacy. News flash. Pedofiles are riddled throughout the so-called "gay community". Pedophilia, from my direct experience, is baked into this so-called "gay community".
As a life-long member of this "so-called" community, I have not seen that to be true. It is, in fact, quite common for pedophiles to not particularly care which gender their prey are (this has certainly been the case with many priests). Historically, however, boys have been easier to gain access to.

To be sure, I knew a few pedophiles here in Toronto, and they were generally shunned by the adult gay people. There was a small group that preyed on teen hockey fans at Maple Leaf Gardens in the 1970s, and they were always on the fringe of all community activities in town. In fact, they tried to have a go at me long ago, and I was not at all polite in my suggestion of what they could do to themselves.
 

Viker

Your beloved eccentric Auntie Cristal
I do thank you for the sentiment, but you have no idea, at all, if these people were LGBTQ+... I almost get a sense of the No True Scotsman fallacy. News flash. Pedofiles are riddled throughout the so-called "gay community". Pedophilia, from my direct experience, is baked into this so-called "gay community".
You're just cancelling out a potential "no true Scotsman" fallacy and replacing it with your own generalization fallacy.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
I do thank you for the sentiment, but you have no idea, at all, if these people were LGBTQ+... I almost get a sense of the No True Scotsman fallacy. News flash. Pedofiles are riddled throughout the so-called "gay community". Pedophilia, from my direct experience, is baked into this so-called "gay community".
Do you believe pedophilia to be more prominent among homosexuals than heterosexuals? 82% of sexual abuse victims are female (Children and Teens: Statistics | RAINN).
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Do you believe pedophilia to be more prominent among homosexuals than heterosexuals? 82% of sexual abuse victims are female (Children and Teens: Statistics | RAINN).
Based on my understanding, all 11 men who abused me, knew each other. I'm thinking it may well have been friendships due to the "perks" they got hanging around each other. It's a mixed bag. I have no idea on the hetero side of the coin but suspect there are more lone wolves in that camp. It'd love to say more but cannot.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Based on my understanding, all 11 men who abused me, knew each other. I'm thinking it may well have been friendships due to the "perks" they got hanging around each other. It's a mixed bag. I have no idea on the hetero side of the coin but suspect there are more lone wolves in that camp. It'd love to say more but cannot.
If it's worth anything, I'm sorry.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
You're demonstrating poor reading skills. No one, not me, not anyone on this thread that I've seen is fearing transwomen in the restroom. Go back, take a breathe, slow down, and read more carefully!
You did bring it up. You said cis women are afraid. That's been challenged on the grounds thise fears are irrational and offered counter examples where the majirity group has been afraid of mingling with a minority group.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
Well, put it that way, and people who look like men (according to you) shouldn't use women's restrooms, but people with body parts more typically associated with women shouldn't use men's restrooms. So let's just agree that trans people are only allowed bathroom priviliges in the privacy of their own homes. In the office, they have to hold it 9-to-5. And the same for people that look like women, but have body parts more typically associated with men. That sounds fair, doesn't it?

Sorry for the confusion, that's not the point I'm trying to make..

Recently some trans women have decided that it's okay to be a trans woman and still look like a man. For example, it's now not uncommon for a trans woman to have a beard.

For the most part I don't have any problems with that. But the issue is that if people who LOOK like men are normally seen entering women's restrooms, that makes it easier for men who want to assault women to do so as well.
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
If you want a productive debate that requires accurately portraying what people are saying and not misrepresenting them.
And it's not as comolex as you think. Fearing transwomen in the women's restroom is no different than white people being opposed to ending racial segregation for fears black women will prey upon white women. Or, as anither garbage claim US History has seen, Chinese men preying upon white women.

says the person who continues to misrepresent what I'm saying ;)

can we lighten up a bit and not assume ill will or bad faith?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
I’m sure @icehorse is rational enough to accept scientific data and acknowledge that we should place that above irrational fears

Surely, that is reasonable to assume?
Right @icehorse? You’re a science-y person, yeah?!

I'm going to amend my previous statement. Not a lot but a bit. I read the "Study" more carefully. First of all, the link is to a summary of the study, not the study itself. And the link within the link is also not to the actual study. If I'm wrong about that, if either of those things are meant to be the actual study, then it's no study at all. Both links appear to be summaries.

The summaries themselves are vague and a bit ambiguous. I suspect (not sure), that the study had to do with whether trans women themselves represent a danger to women and girls in public restrooms. Whether they do or not, that is NOT the point I'm making. So it could be that I'm misinterpreting the summary of the study? But I really do think the summary is vague and ambiguous.

But for the sake of discussion, let's say it really IS about the point I'm making. In that case, the problem is that - as I've been saying - it's a relatively new thing for trans women to sport beards. So even if the study factored that in - which is NOT mentioned at all - it's too new to have collected any meaningful data.

I believe that leaves us stranded with nothing more than out common sense ;)
 

danieldemol

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Sorry for the confusion, that's not the point I'm trying to make..

Recently some trans women have decided that it's okay to be a trans woman and still look like a man. For example, it's now not uncommon for a trans woman to have a beard.

For the most part I don't have any problems with that. But the issue is that if people who LOOK like men are normally seen entering women's restrooms, that makes it easier for men who want to assault women to do so as well.
Some women who are really women have beards, should we prevent them (authentic women) using the ladies restroom because they have facial hair in case it leads to the assault of other women?
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
says the person who continues to misrepresent what I'm saying ;)

can we lighten up a bit and not assume ill will or bad faith?
I didn't assume. You brought up ciswomen being afraid, amd doubt some are, but should arachnophobia be a concern for pet shops? Should those who want segregation for fear and hatred of people who aren't of this odd construction called white be considered when deciding public policy?
Or do you think shark hunting is good because movies like Jaws made people afraid of them?
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
I didn't assume. You brought up ciswomen being afraid, amd doubt some are, but should arachnophobia be a concern for pet shops? Should those who want segregation for fear and hatred of people who aren't of this odd construction called white be considered when deciding public policy?
Or do you think shark hunting is good because movies like Jaws made people afraid of them?

I promise you, I'm operating in good faith here. I am struggling to understand how the comparisons you're making relate to my concern?

So let's take it in steps:

Do you agree that men raping and assaulting women is a real issue and that it's realistic for women to be cautious and concerned about men being violent towards them?
 
Top