Aupmanyav
Be your own guru
Even an infant?As you know all men are born with a sin nature.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Even an infant?As you know all men are born with a sin nature.
Once again, all good stuff. Thanks.
As you know all men are born with a sin nature.
Rom 5:12,
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:Why was Jesus an exception? If he had a sin nature, how would that have affected his being the lamb without blemish, which was required for our redemption. Seems like it would have disqualifyed him.
There must have been some difference between how God worked with Abraham and how he worked with Mary. Abraham's son was born with a sin nature, whereas Mary's was not.
Galatians 4:29 says Isaac was born "according" (Greek "kata") the spirit.
Luke said the spirit will "come upon" (Greek "erchomai epi" - to arrive upon) Mary and that it will "overshadow" (Strong's - "to envelop in a haze of brilliancy, to invest with preternatural influence.").
Do you see any difference?
BTW, I trust you understand that I in no wise take Jesus to be God. He was the son of God. Seems like that one little factoid alone would make people understand Jesus and God are two entirely separate "people." I mean, in what world can a son be his own father? That's insanity. There are tons of other scriptures that also make it quite impossible for Jesus to be God.
There may be a few verses that can be construed into saying Jesus was God, but it is poor scholarship indeed to elevate the few unclear verses over the many clear verses. Somehow they all have to fit.
Hope you got the pump working.
Afraid so.Even an infant?
Jesus is fully human, 100%. Yes as to all his perfection coming after his suffering and resurrection. No problems there for me.Rob wrote...... There must have been some difference between how God worked with Abraham and how he worked with Mary. Abraham's son was born with a sin nature, whereas Mary's was not.
According to the above, You do not accept that Jesus was a true human being, and was not sired by male human semen, being introduced into the uterus of the young Mary.
1 John 4: 1-3; "My dear friends, do not believe all who claim to have the Spirit, but test them to find out if the spirit they have comes from God. For many false prophets have gone out everywhere. This is how you will be able to know whether it is God's Spirit: anyone who acknowledges that Jesus Christ came as 'A HUMAN BEING' has the Spirit who comes from God. But anyone who denies this about Jesus does not have the Spirit from God. The spirit that he has is from the Enemy of Christ; you heard that it would come, and now it is here in the world already.
If Jesus was not of the seed of Adam, then he was not a human being, but some hybrid son of a life form that is said to have pre-existed the creation of the Cosmos.
Hebrews 5: 7; In his life on earth Jesus made his prayers and requests with loud cries and tears to God, who could save him from death. Because he was humble and devoted, God heard him. But even though he was 'A' Son of God, he learnt through his sufferings to be obedient. When he was made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all those who obey him, and God declared him to be high priest, in the priestly order of Melchizedek.
'A' son of God, check it out in Strong's concordance, KJV, Amplified, RSV, and others. Psalms 82: 6; ‘You are gods,’ I said; ‘all of you are children of the Most High.’ All Israelites are the children of God.
According to the Holy scriptures, the man Jesus had to be brought to perfection through the sufferings that he endured, only then did the Lord God our savior declare him to be high priest, in the priestly order of Melchizedek with these words, "You are my son, (My heir and successor) TODAY I have become your Father."
Hebrews 5:5; In the same way, Christ did not take upon himself the honour of being a high priest. Instead, God said to him:
“You are my Son; today I have become your Father.” He also said in another place, You will be a priest for ever,
in the priestly order of Melchizedek.”
When did the Lord God our savior, declare Jesus to be his son with these words, "You are my son, TODAY I have become your Father." Or This day I have begotten thee?
All have sinned and all must pay the death penalty for the sins of the body in which they (The invisible minds) had developed, The only one who can pay the penalty for the sins of Mankind, Is He who developed within the body of mankind, 'The Son of Man,' our Lord God and savior, who filled the man Jesus with his spirit, and who abandoned his chosen successor on the cross as he gave up the spirit, crying out, "My God, My God, Why have you abandoned me."
He, who from the previous world that was destroyed by water, who was taken up and anointed as the heir and successor to the throne of the MOST HIGH in the creation, where he was to serve God before the body of Adam into all eternity, was translated in order that he should never see death, and it was he who could never die, who, after duplicating himself in the man Jesus, ceased to be an individual entity, by releasing the spirits of all the righteous, who had been gathered to him during the three days, or three thousand years that he had been in the valley of man, which is the spiritual dimension that co-exists within our three dimensional universe, (The Kingdom of God is within you."
Three days later, when the body of Jesus, who had been obedient to our Lord even unto his cruel death of the cross, was resurrected, those righteous spirits came out of their graves and entered the holy city and revealed themselves as the risen body of the Christ, who had been anointed by the Most High in the creation, as his heir and successor.
Jesus is seen as the 'Son of Man' by the words that the Lord spoke through his obedient servant, Acts 3: 13; "The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the God of our ancestors, has given divine Glory to his servant Jesus."
Jesus from Nazareth,, who is now incontestably divine, and who sits in the heavenly throne of our father and invites all. who like himself, are able to win the victory, to sit beside him in our Fathers throne, from where they will judge even the angels.
As to the dam pump, the bearings are ceased, lucky that we had an old pump that still works, which will do the Job until I can get the bearing replaced.
Catch ya later mate.
Who would raise them from dead? A God? You have neither established the existence of God nor that of any everlasting life. What are you doing? Selling snake-oil? You are also talking of a new earth. Where, when? Yeah, people will be judged according to their deeds. Then Jesus, Allah, God are superfluous.But he is not really the only way to enjoy everlasting life. Everybody will eventually be raised from the dead and judged according to their works with consideration of their hearts and intentions. The ones that pass go to everlasting life on a new earth (the idea of floating on a cloud forever is a un-scriptural, man made invention).
Among the many advantages enjoyed by Christians in God's plan is that they have already been judged and found worthy.
Jesus is fully human, 100%. Yes as to all his perfection coming after his suffering and resurrection. No problems there for me.
The only thing I don't think you understand is that God created a new seed and that is the seed by which Jesus was conceived. .. Otherwise it would have been an awfully painful birth for Mary.
But God didn't really know for sure Jesus would go the distance until he said, "It is finished."
Do you find it odd that God told Eve the redeemer would come from her seed? Isn't seed usually from the male? Any ideas on that?
All those questions can be answered at: tltf.org.Who would raise them from dead? A God? Neither you have not established the existence of God nor that of any everlasting life. What are you doing? Selling snake-oil? You are also talking of a new earth. Where, when? Yeah, people will be judged according to their deeds. Then Jesus, Allah, God are superfluous.
You are also talking of a new earth. Where, when? Yeah, people will be judged according to their deeds. Then Jesus, Allah, God are superfluous. How can Christians be judged before their life ends? Hitler, Franco, and other Christian dictators were Christians. Is the new earth assured for them?
UNICEF estimates say 130 million children are born every year in the world. Sure, as the father of two children, I do not under-estimate the child-birth pain. But why would Mary have had an 'awfully painful' child birth? So, it was a new kind of seed - God's seed? How did it reach Mary's womb?
Ah, your God is not omniscient and omnipotent? He was not sure whether Jesus would last the distance. He was doubtful whether he had made Jesus, his seed, strong enough. What can I say about your God when you have not provided me any evidence of his existence and action? You have talked about all things in the world but not the evidence for your God.
Well thanks for giving me credit for being smart. It's about time I got some recognition around here.That would be more of what you and others have written in the forums at RF. Smart way to avoid answering.
Your mention of nature caught my eye. You said correctly that Jesus has the same nature as God. But, be careful. Does having the same nature mean Jesus actually is God?
Jesus, being a man, could have sinned. The scriptures declare that he was tempted just like the rest of us. If you knew you were God, would your temptations be anything at all like the rest of the human race? I think knowing I was God, would make me impervious to any and all temptation. So if Jesus were God, his temptation would hardly be anything at all like ours, which the scriptures say is the case. That is a huge problem that must be solved by anyone who thinks Jesus is God. It can easily be solved by confessing, as the scriptures declare, that Jesus is the son of God.
There is no indication whatsoever in the scriptures that ask us to change the normal meaning of "father" or "son." It is clear that a father and his son can in no wise be one and the same person. Throwing around terms like "essence" does not change the fact that a father and his son are two separate and unique individuals, albeit they both share the same nature. A human father would produce a son with a human nature. Likewise, a Godly father would produce a son with a Godly nature. It's incredibly simple. The confusion lies in trying to make a father and son one and the same individual.
Getting back to the idea that Jesus had a divine nature, I would only point out a verse in Hebrews.
2 Pet 1:4,
Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.Did you know you also had a divine nature? Well, if not, now you do, because Peter wasn't using any big fancy words when he wrote this verse. it's about an 8th grade reading level, and it says as plain as day that you, as a born again believe, have the divine nature! Fantastic truth!
But think about it; are you not called a son of God? That's what 1 John 3:2 plainly says. Being a son of God, you, like the offspring of anything, have the same nature as your Father in heaven! What a fantastic truth.
I know it is taught that we can not understand God. That is what the churches teach, but it is yet another orthodox doctrinal point that does not agree with the scriptures.
Col 1:9,
For this cause we also, since the day we heard [it], do not cease to pray for you, and to desire that ye might be filled with the knowledge of his will in all wisdom and spiritual understanding;
Filled is filled. Something that is filled has no more room. God wants you to be filled with knowledge. That doesn't sound at all like God is telling us to, "take it by faith." It only makes sense. How are you going to have true faith (trust) in something you don't even understand? Trust requires understanding. God wants us to understand.
1 Cor 2:16,
For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.Jesus had no trouble understanding his Father. Why should we?
God bless you brother!
Afraid so.
There are several verses in Genesis chapter one that talk about seed. Essentially, that say the offspring of anything has the nature of its parent. That's as true for a lizard as for a human. Except for Jesus, there is not a person born who did not begin without a sin nature. That is why we all die.
Rom 5:12,
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:Death is a part of life. It comes with the territory. Jesus provided a way out for those who want one. But he is not really the only way to enjoy everlasting life. Everybody will eventually be raised from the dead and judged according to their works with consideration of their hearts and intentions. The ones that pass go to everlasting life on a new earth (the idea of floating on a cloud forever is a un-scriptural, man made invention).
The ones that fail experience what the scriptures call "the second death." Given that the scriptures declare in many places that the dead have no consciousness, the idea of eternal torment in a lake of fire is yet another un-scriptural invention of the orthodox church. The ones that fail will simply cease to exist, just like the first death.
Among the many advantages enjoyed by Christians in God's plan is that they have already been judged and found worthy. They have a guaranteed spot on the new earth which God will create after Armageddon. Christians need not wonder about their final end. They can enjoy this life while knowing the will have a new life that is about 10
Jesus is fully human, 100%. Yes as to all his perfection coming after his suffering and resurrection. No problems there for me.
The only thing I don't think you understand is that God created a new seed and that is the seed by which Jesus was conceived. Mary had intercourse after Jesus' conception but before his birth. Otherwise it would have been an awfully painful birth for Mary.
Jesus thus started out perfect, unlike all other men born with seed from Adam. But it was his free will choice to believe and obey God in order to remain perfect until his sacrifice as the lamb without blemish. But God didn't really know for sure Jesus would go the distance until he said, "It is finished." Then God was able to raise him and declare him to be the Son of God with power.
God also created a new creature in each born again believer, so no new concept.
Do you find it odd that God told Eve the redeemer would come from her seed? Isn't seed usually from the male? Any ideas on that?
Take care
If He has the full nature of God then He is by nature God. Phil 2 tells us He kept the nature that He had as a prehuman when He added to it the nature of a servant and became a man. He was both God and man by nature
Caesar's image was on the coin. Does that mean the coin was Caesar? Of course not. An image of something is not the thing itself. Did not God create us in His image?Isa 53:11 After the anguish of His soul, He will see the light of life and be satisfied. By His knowledge My righteous Servant will justify many, and He will bear their iniquities.
Does that matter? He did not come to be tested by He Father to see if He was good enough, He came to do a job as the Lamb without blemish, the one who is the image of His Father.
How in the world could his temptations have been anything at all like ours? Do you think you might handle temptation differently if you knew you were God? If Jesus was God then Hebrews 4:15 is not true. He could in no wise have been tempted like us if he were God.And yes the scriptures say He was tempted like the rest of us but did not sin. Whom He was and maybe also knowing whom He was could have helped Him not to sin.
I'm not making them one. I'm saying God is the Father of Jesus. That makes two people in any book. Again, two individuals having the same nature does not make them one individual. Like I said, two lizards have the same nature, but they are still two lizards, and two (or three) lizards are never going to be one lizard.Making the Father and the Son one and the same individual sounds like what the Unitarians do. The Trsnity acknowledges the distinctiveness of the Father and Son and acknowledges also the same nature that they share.
The Greek word is from the root koinos.I don't think that verse says we are fully divine, another translation is that we "taste" of the divine nature. Jesus was fully divine and took on servant nature also as a man and we are fully human and taste the divine nature and become children of God when we are joined spiritually to Jesus.
We do have the nature of God and yet we still sin. The problem is in our flesh, not the new creation of 2 Cor 5:17.If we had he full nature of God we also would not sin.
We can if we ditch tradition and only believe the scriptures. Now we may never arrive at the point of knowing everything, but God nonetheless made it available. If you had my mind, would you not know everything I know? Why is it any different in 1 Corinthians 2:16?Does having the mind of Christ mean that we know all things about God? Not that I am aware.
It doesn't matter what I meant. Here's what the scriptures say:Rrobs said : “As you know all men are born with a sin nature.” (post #160)
Aupmanyav asked : “Even an infant?” (post #161)
Rrobs replied : “afraid so.” (post #163)
Hi @Aupmanyav
I just wanted to make a very specific point. @rrobs did not explain in detail what he meant when he claimed that even infants are born with a “sin nature”.
I just wanted to mention that not all Christians believe (or historically "believed") this same thing regarding infants.
Infants, however, were, themselves born innocent of any sin in the early Judeo-Christian model.
Thanks, Clear, for trying to put another perspective on sin in Christianity, but in early Judeo-Christian model, the infants, even while being innocents, were punishable by the jealous YHWH up to third or fourth generation for the sins of their fathers.Infants, however, were, themselves born innocent of any sin in the early Judeo-Christian model.
Good luck coming to your own beliefs on these points Aupmanyav.
Thanks, Clear, for trying to put another perspective on sin in Christianity, but in early Judeo-Christian model, the infants, even after being innocents, were punishable by the jealous YHWH up to third or fourth generation for the sins of their fathers.
Nice stories, the jewish Sindbad with his 1001 tales.
Sindbad and ..- Google Search
I think the biggest difference between you and I is that you use tradition as your basis of truth whereas I use the scriptures.Hi Rrobs
Rrobs said : “As you know all men are born with a sin nature.” (post #160)
Aupmanyav asked : “Even an infant?” (post #161)
Rrobs replied : “afraid so.” (post #163)
Clear said : "I just wanted to make a very specific point. @rrobs did not explain in detail what he meant when he claimed that even infants are born with a “sin nature”."...
Infants, however, were, themselves born innocent of any sin in the early Judeo-Christian model. (post #172)
Rrobs replied : "It doesn't matter what I meant. Here's what the scriptures say: Rom 5:12, Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:" (post #173)
Of course it matters what you meant Rrobs.
THE RATIONAL CHRISTIAN BELIEF THAT NEWBORNS ARE INNOCENT OF ANY PERSONAL SIN VS THE IRRATIONAL BELIEF THAT NEWBORNS PERSONALLY SIN
The belief that an innocent infant will someday become a morally competent adult and sin is different than the silly theory that an innocent newborn themselves are born "full of sin" or having themselves "committed sin". If you "meant" to describe the first theory then this is supportable. If you meant to describe the second theory then this is a silly and irrational religious theory.
WHY SHOULD YOUR PERSONAL, MODERN RELIGION AND ITS INTERPRETATION TAKE PRIORITY OVER ANCIENT CHRISTIAN RELIGION WITH ITS INTERPRETATION OF TEXTS?
While you seem to make the claim that the "historical belief" of the earliest Christians is not to be taken over your personal own personal interpretation of their scriptures, you must keep in mind that your religion is not the same as their religion regarding the innocence of newborns. The early Christian belief and interpretation of scriptures was that newborns were born innocent of any personal sin. Why should your personal belief and personal interpretation take priority over that of the belief and interpretation of the earliest Christians?
Clear
τωσιφισεω