I'd like to think I can bat 1.000 but everyone makes mistakes.Story of your life, is it not?
Precisely! So... why should I believe you?You believe a person about something but you can never be sure whether it is absolute truth or not.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'd like to think I can bat 1.000 but everyone makes mistakes.Story of your life, is it not?
Precisely! So... why should I believe you?You believe a person about something but you can never be sure whether it is absolute truth or not.
That is one theory.My thinking does not matter. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. There is no other name under heaven by which men might be saved.
I'd like to think I can bat 1.000 but everyone makes mistakes.
Precisely! So... why should I believe you?
Attacking God? They're not atheists. Attacking theism, or religion? Then they can be atheists. God doesn't exist (from an atheist point of view), whereas both theism and religion clearly do, and impact on the world quite directly sometimes.
Done!Exactly, now you're thinking. You shouldn't.
Lately I've seen a **** ton of posts attacking atheism, with screwy logic at best, but usually incoherent either way.
Now, I get why atheists attack religion. They see it as a threat, and sometimes they are right. But not always. But at least their reasoning has some basis in fact. Now when theists attack atheists... usually it's accusing them of being liars, or saying that somehow it "doesn't make sense". I dunno, it seems if I had to place a bet, I'd probably side with atheism 4 out of 5 times.
I've seen a lot of the old classic arguments, a lot of them even I didn't dare touch when I was a theist myself. but nowdays it seems as if the fundamentalist christian rhetoric is now too mainstream. People accusing atheists of being atheists so they can sin, that they only are atheists because something bad happened to them or that somehow they are just in denial.
But it seems to me, that if your religion is so apparent (let's ignore that you were probably brought up to believe in it or at least it's the dominant spiritual force where you live) then it wouldn't have all these atheists around. Maybe, just maybe, them being so open about it, the fact that many left religion because they learned more about it, maybe that scares you. Because you realize deep down you've had doubts yourself, and are often just going through the motions. It seems that some types of theists are obsessed with the atheist. Their fixation on how wrong they are, is a reflection of their own projection. Kind of like how the strongest homophobic preachers were often caught with other men.
I dunno, just my two cents. It isn't particularly my fight, I'm not an atheist or theist, but still. You can't really disprove atheism, other than to prove theism. Theism can't be disproved because there is always another possible way for there to be a god, but that doesn't mean it's correct, and at a certain point it's not reasonable to believe anymore when enough versions of it's been disproven (as have many in the past). Where you draw that line is subjective, and there will always be some who are theists and atheists.
And I don't see anything wrong with that. What I do see wrong, is people attacking each other with strawmen.
You make a lot of proselytizing statements like this, but fail to provide any proof to back them up. Can you support this with any verifiable evidence?My thinking does not matter. Jesus is the way, the truth and the life. There is no other name under heaven by which men might be saved.
You make a lot of proselytizing statements like this, but fail to provide any proof to back them up. Can you support this with any verifiable evidence?
Because it was written from the perspective of and by one man.Why do you need evidence for something that is obvious? Is it because you just do not wish to believe God?
Because it was written from the perspective of and by one man.
That isn't what I said. Focus! We are talking about Romans, right? That was written by one man.You think the entire Bible was written by one man?
That isn't what I said. Focus! We are talking about Romans, right? That was written by one man.
That is exactly why I don't believe it. Paul had a product to sell and he did a remarkable job given the current state of things.Oh. So you don't believe the book of Romans because it was written by one man, filled with the Holy Spirit.
That is exactly why I don't believe it. Paul had a product to sell and he did a remarkable job given the current state of things.
He genuinely believed what he said, but he was still pushing a product.Really. Then why he did he choose to be executed rather than recant?
There is a concept that many have brought up but you still fail to understand. When you, Paul, or anyone makes an affirmation, it is their job to prove to the audience (people like me) that what they are saying is true. Not the other way around. This is the last time I am going to explain this to you.Can you show that he was a liar from hard fact or strict logic?
Thank you for reminding my why more often than no Christians irritate the hell out of me more than anything. You keep going that what I believe is wrong, you want to say it is a lie, you want to say I need to believe as you, but yet more often than not when I tell y'all what your Book actually says ya run with your tail tucked between your legs.No, theists attack atheism because:
1. It blinds men to the truth and leads them to destruction. We care about you therefore we plead with you not to believe all of this atheistic jargon.
2. It is a cleverly devised lie.
Romans 1:20.
That is... frankly, that is a bit ridiculous.Well, that's your opinion. Stack that up against the Apostle Paul and well, you should know who I choose to believe.
I think they mean that the people who don't automatically believe, lie on purpose and do in fact believe in everything that the Bible says even if they never heard it.How is the lack of belief in any gods a "lie"?
Granted, I have my moments, but I'd never claim some holy smoke was talking through me.Paul is an Apostle of Jesus Christ. The holy spirit spoke through Paul.
Why do you not believe him?