MARCELLO
Transitioning from male to female
no ,chap.Because of your post #71???
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
no ,chap.Because of your post #71???
Not necessarely. Jehovas witnesses are hardcore bible followers but they dont believe in the trinity. Arians were also were biblical but they saw Jesus as only the Son of God not God himself. I heard in some video on youtube that Isa means something like Allahs chosen one and word of God but im not sure how accurate that is and what the proofs are. But if you hear these titles you'd think a christian is saying them.But he is called Issa in Koran not Jesus. Certainly it does not mean the same thing. There is no trinity in islam.Jesus definitely means trinity and this concept has nothing to do within islamic theories,so it remains meaningless .
Yes,yes,yes,bla bla bla. Sure you know the best, and the arians are on the table ?? Then again bla bla bla x 5 times.Not necessarely. Jehovas witnesses are hardcore bible followers but they dont believe in the trinity. Arians were also were biblical but they saw Jesus as only the Son of God not God himself. I heard in some video on youtube that Isa means something like Allahs chosen one and word of God but im not sure how accurate that is and what the proofs are. But if you hear these titles you'd think a christian is saying them.
Feel free to disprove my points. Arians are on the table because they didnt believe in the trinity and saw Jesus as Gods Son. (Lol am i prophet muhammad, which his followers said: 'allah and his apostle know best', that you give me the honor of 'sure you know the best'?)Yes,yes,yes,bla bla bla. Sure you know the best, and the arians are on the table ?? Then again bla bla bla x 5 times.
Use google dear. We know that you are without a camera( how meaningful and etc. ) .I am not your tutor ,am I?Feel free to disprove my points. Arians are on the table because they didnt believe in the trinity and saw Jesus as Gods Son.
Okay brother. i dont even know what youre trying to say anymore.Use google dear. We know that you are without a camera( how meaningful and etc. ) .I am not your tutor ,am I?
In regards to Jesus, the difference between Christianity and Islam is in Christianity he is the Messiah and in Islam he is a prophet, but both still hold to the same teachings.But he is called Issa in Koran not Jesus. Certainly it does not mean the same thing. There is no trinity in islam.Jesus definitely means trinity and this concept has nothing to do within islamic theories,so it remains meaningless .
No dear,in islam he is just another prophet,nothing more.In regards to Jesus, the difference between Christianity and Islam is in Christianity he is the Messiah and in Islam he is a prophet, but both still hold to the same teachings.
I believe in the quran Jesus is also the messiah of the jewish people. i believe he is called 'masih' or 'messiah' in it. But ofcourse he is not viewed as the Son of God because the Quran says that Allah doesnt have any Sons or children. Relating to both Christians and polytheists who said that the arabian God Hubal had daughters called Al Manat, Al Uzza and Al Lat.In regards to Jesus, the difference between Christianity and Islam is in Christianity he is the Messiah and in Islam he is a prophet, but both still hold to the same teachings.
This is a common variant on the "you're not reading it right" argument. Plus, it implies that a poster here, is more expert than scholars who spent YEARS laboring over translations.
That's what I said.No dear,in islam he is just another prophet,nothing more.
What does "world wide" have to do with "universal"?I'm not sure if you mean to be addressing me? Clearly, with 1.6 billion followers, Islam has become a worldwide religion.
And if you want to judge who's right then you should have a knowledge on the subject, otherwise it is a biased opinion
which isn't based on knowledge.
I'm a professional editor. I've read the Quran cover to cover in one translation, and vetted that translation against two other translations. The words are the words.
Now you can claim that "I'm not interpreting the words correctly", but how do you know that? The folks running ISIS and Boko Haram would agree with me on how to interpret the words. About 1/3 of Muslims in the world would largely agree with me on my interpretations. So how do you know which interpretations are "correct"?
The verse is very clear, it speaks about reproduction. here's the verse and the meaning of it's words
glory to him سُبْحَانَ الَّذِي
created all the pairs خَلَقَ الْأَزْوَاجَ كُلَّهَا
that germinate by earth مِمَّا تُنْبِتُ الْأَرْضُ
and from themselves وَمِنْ أَنْفُسِهِمْ
and from where they don't know وَمِمَّا لَا يَعْلَمُون
Why sinuous believe that? Do you have any verifiable evidence to support this belief?Yes, Quran is 100% protected against Errors. I believe that till death.
And how do you interpret this verse?