MARCELLO
Transitioning from male to female
Under a so called sheria but even homosexuality is legal here. So do your math...Is the system of government, secular or Islamist ??
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Under a so called sheria but even homosexuality is legal here. So do your math...Is the system of government, secular or Islamist ??
(Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor forbid what God and His Messenger, nor condemn the religion of truth from those who were given the book until they pay tribute out of hand and they are submissive (29)
Of those who were given the book
Which means Jews and Christians
What is the difference between fighting and killing ???Fight doesn't mean kill, the verse doesn't say "اقتلو أهل الكتاب"
So it does not apply Islamic sharia lawUnder a so called sheria but even homosexuality is legal here. So do your math..
So it does not apply Islamic sharia lawUnder a so called sheria but even homosexuality is legal here. So do your math.
But I am telling you the truth. Btw,What's islamic thought? Pls define it...So it does not apply Islamic sharia law
I'm here talking about the Koran and not the policies of the Islamic countries
I'm talking about Islamic Thought
Did somebody quote from such scriptures as I requested? PleasePlease quote the religions that have claims to this effect in the scriptures they have from their founders with reason also mentioned in those scriptures.
Regards
This request seems illogical. The claim is that religions claim their scriptures to be without error. Not that every scripture makes this claim about itself.psychoslice said: ↑
Doesn't every religion say there's no mistakes in their scriptures, well someone is lying lol.
Did somebody quote from such scriptures as I requested? Please
Regards
I understand one's discomfort. Christian scripture does not have both claims and reason from Jesus on the issues.This request seems illogical. The claim is that religions claim their scriptures to be without error. Not that every scripture makes this claim about itself.
Jesus didn't write any of the Bible, so why would you even expect to see that? Again, this points to your request being irrational.I understand one's discomfort. Christian scripture does not have both claims and reason from Jesus on the issues.
Regard
One's embarrassment again?Jesus didn't write any of the Bible, so why would you even expect to see that? Again, this points to your request being irrational.
What embarrassment. No one claims that Jesus wrote the Bible. Where did you come up with that one?One's embarrassment again?
Regards
It is due to wrong understanding of Quran, much propagated by the opposing websites.
If one studies Quran oneself:
One won't find any mistakes in Quran.
- intently
- unbiased
- with an open mind
- and with correct approach
Thread open for discussion to everybody.
Regards
"The Quran says:The Quran says:
1) all things are created in pairs
2) the sun sets in water on the Earth.
3) stars are missiles against Devils
4) mountains were put in place to stop the Earth from shaking.
5) the Earth is spread out like a carpet.
6) the Earth was created before the heavens
7) the sun runs to a resting place
I'd say they were pretty major errors, what's more is they are all in line with the scientific knowledge of the time, more proof the Quran was written by men.
"The Quran says:
1) all things are created in pairs"
Please quote the verse with some preceding verses and some following verses for the context from Arabic Text.
Regards
The hurf-e-jar (preposition) 'min' can be translated both ways,and it is not wrong. Does one mean that religion should not support science or science should not support religion? What is wrong if either of them supports the other? I don't get one exactly.Surah Dhaariyaat verse 50 (Surah 51)
http://www.alislam.org/quran/tafseer/?page=2490®ion=E1
Some Muslims try saying the particle 'min' should actually be translated as 'some of' rather than 'of', this is incorrect and is another example of Muslims applying modern scientific knowledge on verses from an ancient book. This verse is clear about all things being created in pairs, other verses (such as 36:36) state that all things are created in pairs and the Islamic version of the Noahs ark myth also clearly show that the author/s of the Quran believed that all things came in pairs (understandable given the knowledge of the world at that time).
The hurf-e-jar (preposition) 'min' can be translated both ways,and it is not wrong. Does one mean that religion should not support science or science should not support religion? What is wrong if either of them supports the other? I don't get one exactly.
In any case science does not support Agnosticism. Right?
Science is not a function of Agnosticism.Right?
Regards