There is more then enough evidence to prove God exists.

[SkepticThinker]

It was a part of a survey I did. I never mix work with my social life. I am sure that if the technique were used on my friends that it would work, however, I am not altogether convinced that it is ethical. It is a part of a program by our government to determine whether the reintroduction of religion into our society might reduce the moral decline in our country. It works. I have seen it work. I just believe that it messes with free agency by planting a purpose built seed into the brain that has a rapid growth.

Sounds like an interesting survey. I'm wondering how you measure "moral decline."

I'm also wondering what examples you may have that injecting religion into society reduces moral decline.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Words are cheap, unless you can substantiate them with evidence. I await your evidence for your indictment, of me being upset with the idea of discussing them, before I give a full response.

Um, not sure why I need evidence to back up what I just said?

This thread is good enough evidence, I'd say. Or just the post I was responding to.

 

[Serenity7855]

Sounds like an interesting survey. I'm wondering how you measure "moral decline."

I'm also wondering what examples you may have that injecting religion into society reduces moral decline.

Any sign of that evidence of me being upset with the idea of discussing them yet, or was it yet another baseless assertion from the master of misrepresentation.

I'd answer this if I thought you seriously wanted to know, but your track record here tell a different story.

 

[Serenity7855]

Um, not sure why I need evidence to back up what I just said?

This thread is good enough evidence, I'd say. Or just the post I was responding to.

You need evidence because you might be lying. Your duplicitous track record makes it more then likely. You have no evidence because you are lying. Wo unto the liar, for he (or she, in your case) shall be thrust down to hell. As I said, words are cheap and posters like you bring disrepute to the descent atheists on here

 

[SkepticThinker]

Any sign of that evidence of me being upset with the idea of discussing them yet, or was it yet another baseless assertion from the master of misrepresentation.

Already answered.

I'd answer this if I thought you seriously wanted to know, but your track record here tell a different story.

You got me! I asked because I didn't actually want to know. Add mind reading abilities to your long list of talents.

 

[SkepticThinker]

You need evidence because you might be lying. Your duplicitous track record makes it more then likely. You have no evidence because you are lying. Wo unto the liar, for he (or she, in your case) shall be thrust down to hell. As I said, words are cheap and posters like you bring disrepute to the descent atheists on here

All I can do is laugh at the psychological projection that is emanating from this post.

Unreal.


The extra funny part is that you were calling me a good atheist at the beginning of this thread. Until I challenged your assertions, that is. Too funny.

 

[adi2d]

All I can do is laugh at the psychological projection that is emanating from this post.

Unreal.


The extra funny part is that you were calling me a good atheist at the beginning of this thread. Until I challenged your assertions, that is. Too funny.

I guess a good atheist is one that agrees with him.

 

[adi2d]

You need evidence because you might be lying. Your duplicitous track record makes it more then likely. You have no evidence because you are lying. Wo unto the liar, for he (or she, in your case) shall be thrust down to hell. As I said, words are cheap and posters like you bring disrepute to the descent atheists on here

I've pointed out a couple times that you have lied on this thread. woe is you too

 

[SkepticThinker]

I guess a good atheist is one that agrees with him.

That makes for a fun debate.



I must be weird, but I like when people disagree with me. It keeps me on my toes.

 

[Serenity7855]

Already answered.

No, no you haven't. You are avoiding it.

You got me! I asked because I didn't actually want to know. Add mind reading abilities to your long list of talents.

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. No surprised there then.

 

[SkepticThinker]

No, no you haven't. You are avoiding it.


Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. No surprised there then.

I've avoided nothing in this thread. The answer is, as I said, post #3719, and at least half of the rest of your posts in this thread. I could waste my time going through them and giving you specific examples, but I'm sure you'll just do what you did last time and make a snide remark about having too much time on my hands. For someone who's constantly whining about being attacked and insulted, you sure like to do a lot of that yourself. Sorry, not getting sucked into that nonsense anymore. Anyone reading the thread can figure out what I'm talking about. Yourself included.


I'm not the first person on this thread to notice that you get bent out of shape when someone questions your beliefs.



Now, back to the discussion that I'm actually interested in having ... how does someone go about measuring "moral decline?"

 

[Serenity7855]

All I can do is laugh at the psychological projection that is emanating from this post.

Thank you for crediting me with such skills. I didn't even know I was doing it. You must have heard the old saying about laughing at others. Those that laugh last, laugh the longest.

Unreal

.

Aren't you?

The extra funny part is that you were calling me a good atheist at the beginning of this thread. Until I challenged your assertions, that is. Too funny.

If I did then I made a grievous error in Judgement. Your post is positively spiteful and malevolent. I have even put you on my ignore list in the past but removed you thinking that I might have been to hasty, then gradually your posts have become increasingly offensive and crass. It is blatantly obvious that you are not looking to debate but you are looking to contend.

Can I also say that not once, during this entire thread, have you come anywhere near challenging me. I treat your post with both contempt and humor, certainly not seriously. I don't even know why I respond to yours and adi2d posts. You are both of the same ilk and both of you spew forth the same hideous drivel and guile, yet think you are being clever and smart. You are, to those who subscribe to the same malicious and disparaging rhetoric, but to descent poster, such as lewisnotmiller, you are both an embarrassment.

 

[Iti oj]

Well I neither made the good or bad last. Island of misfit toys here I come.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Thank you for crediting me with such skills. I didn't even know I was doing it. You must have heard the old saying about laughing at others. Those that laugh last, laugh the longest.

Yes, that's how projection works.

 

[SkepticThinker]

If I did then I made a grievous error in Judgement. Your post is positively spiteful and malevolent. I have even put you on my ignore list in the past but removed you thinking that I might have been to hasty, then gradually your posts have become increasingly offensive and crass. It is blatantly obvious that you are not looking to debate but you are looking to contend.

Can I also say that not once, during this entire thread, have you come anywhere near challenging me. I treat your post with both contempt and humor, certainly not seriously. I don't even know why I respond to yours and adi2d posts. You are both of the same ilk and both of you spew forth the same hideous drivel and guile, yet think you are being clever and smart. You are, to those who subscribe to the same malicious and disparaging rhetoric, but to descent poster, such as lewisnotmiller, you are both an embarrassment.

What on earth are you talking about???

 

[SkepticThinker]

Well I neither made the good or bad last. Island of misfit toys here I come.

I'm going to call you Hermey from now on.

 

[adi2d]

Seris got a new friend. He wasn't here long enough to see what you're like

 

[SkepticThinker]

So, how does one go about defining and measuring "moral decline?"

 

[Serenity7855]

I've avoided nothing in this thread.

Yes, yes you have.

The answer is, as I said, post #3719, and at least half of the rest of your posts in this thread.

In post 3719 you wrote the following "Then maybe you need to understand that other people have asked many of these questions and have found errors and faults with it. You seem to be upset with the very idea of discussing them." Where in that post have you given any kind of answer?

I could waste my time going through them and giving you specific examples,

You could try, but all you will do is take my words out of context and misrepresent me. I will have to then put them back into context and expose your trickery.

but I'm sure you'll just do what you did last time and make a snide remark about having too much time on my hands.

Why thank you for staying true to form.

For someone who's constantly whining about being attacked and insulted, you sure like to do a lot of that yourself.

Where, or is this yet another baseless assertion of yours.

Sorry, not getting sucked into that nonsense anymore. Anyone reading the thread can figure out what I'm talking about. Yourself included.

Indubitably

I'm not the first person on this thread to notice that you get bent out of shape when someone questions your beliefs.

And what does that mean. Can you not see how puerile and intellectually redundant this statement is. This is a forum whose members are either theists or non-believer. Of course you are not the only one who looks for excuses to offend and denigrate. There are plenty here of your persuasion that will side with you even if you are out of order. I am not the first Christian here to pick up on your caustic and virulent post either. It works both ways.

 

[Serenity7855]

So, how does one go about defining and measuring "moral decline?"

Go to Google and type in the words "is the UK or USA in moral decline" and you will find page upon page describing what you want to know.