• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

There is more then enough evidence to prove God exists.

McBell

McBell

Unbound
Serenity7855 said:
What about euthanasia, in the knowledge of a life hereafter, for tormented, evil, ignoble, demonic and devilish young humans who are in the depth of depravity, degeneracy and brutal servitude in exchange for a place in heaven.

It is not smart or clever to make it look like God is taking innocent suckling children from their mothers arms when in reality it is nothing like that. To do so is dishonest and deceptive. if you do not know the state of being of those children then say nothing rather then be belittled.
Click to expand...

Nice dodge.
 
Serenity7855

Serenity7855

Lambaster of the Angry Anti-Theists
Mestemia said:
Nice dodge.
Click to expand...

If you think it was a dodge then thank you.

If every human died before the age of accountability then we would all return to our father in heaven but that would thwart the reason for coming here in the first place. It really does not take a genius to work that out, unless you are trying to disrupt a thread..
 
Last edited:
viole

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
Serenity7855 said:
What about euthanasia, in the knowledge of a life hereafter, for tormented, evil, ignoble, demonic and devilish young humans who are in the depth of depravity, degeneracy and brutal servitude in exchange for a place in heaven.

It is not smart or clever to make it look like God is taking innocent suckling children from their mothers arms when in reality it is nothing like that. To do so is dishonest and deceptive. if you do not know the state of being of those children then say nothing rather then be belittled.
Click to expand...

Yes, this is fine, but it does not answer my question.

Is killing little babies a blessing? You provably said that it is in your previous post.

Do you confirm?

Ciao

- viole
 
McBell

McBell

Unbound
Serenity7855 said:
If you think it was a dodge then thank you.
Click to expand...
It is a dodge.
You are welcome.

Serenity7855 said:
If every human died before the age of accountability then we would all return to our father in heaven but that would thwart the reason for coming here in the first place. It really does not take a genius to work that out, unless you are trying to disrupt a thread..
Click to expand...

So then the answer to my question, which you have not actually answered, would be "no"?

What is this alleged "purpose"?
 
viole

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
Serenity7855 said:
What about euthanasia, in the knowledge of a life hereafter, for tormented, evil, ignoble, demonic and devilish young humans who are in the depth of depravity, degeneracy and brutal servitude in exchange for a place in heaven.

It is not smart or clever to make it look like God is taking innocent suckling children from their mothers arms when in reality it is nothing like that. To do so is dishonest and deceptive. if you do not know the state of being of those children then say nothing rather then be belittled.
Click to expand...

"The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open. (Hosea 13:16)"

More specifically., do you think that 1 day old children or unborn children can be ignoble, demonic, and devilish in the depth of depravity?

If this is Christian apologetics than you are only showing us Christian moral bankruptcy, I am afraid.

Ciao

- viole
 
Serenity7855

Serenity7855

Lambaster of the Angry Anti-Theists
viole said:
Yes, this is fine, but it does not answer my question.

Is killing little babies a blessing? You provably said that it is in your previous post.

Do you confirm?

Ciao

- viole
Click to expand...
If you believe that I provably said that killing little "babies" is a blessing, then, you will not mind showing me exactly where I said those words. The only thing that I said, that remotely resembles that, was "As they are children they are not held accountable for their transgressions, so, they would go straight to the highest Kingdom in heaven. That is a blessing not a cruel act." As you can clearly see, I did not use the word babies in that post, so it is certainly not provable. And I did not say it was a blessing. I actually said that it is a "blessing not a cruel act" , that is, when compared to the alternative, a cruel act, it is a blessing.
 
Last edited:
McBell

McBell

Unbound
Serenity7855 said:
I have not used the word "purpose" so what are you referring to?
Click to expand...

Ah, you would like to play semantics games whilst still not giving a direct answer to a direct question.
Fine, let us proceed with your semantics game then:

Serenity7855 said:
If every human died before the age of accountability then we would all return to our father in heaven but that would thwart the reason for coming here in the first place. It really does not take a genius to work that out, unless you are trying to disrupt a thread..
Click to expand...

What is this alleged "reason"?
I have taken the liberty of emphasizing your use of the word so you will not miss it...
 
viole

viole

Ontological Naturalist
Premium Member
Serenity7855 said:
If you believe that I provably said that killing little "babies" is a blessing, then, you will not mind showing me exactly where I said those words. The only thing that I said, that remotely resembles that, was "As they are children they are not held accountable for their transgressions, so, they would go straight to the highest Kingdom in heaven. That is a blessing not a cruel act." As you can clearly see, I did not use the word babies in that post, so it is certainly not provable. And I did not say it was a blessing. I actually said that it is a "blessing not a cruel act" , that is, when compared to the alternative, a cruel act, it is a blessing.
Click to expand...

What? LOL.

But babies are not accountable either, I presume. So, if it is a Ok to kill older children, for the sole reason that they are not accountable, then it follows that it is ok to kill babies too. Unless you can tell me under which circumstances it is ok for older, but not too old children and not for babies.

With "ok" I mean that it is a blessing rather than a cruel act.

Ciao

- viole
 
Last edited:
Serenity7855

Serenity7855

Lambaster of the Angry Anti-Theists
Mestemia said:
Ah, you would like to play semantics games whilst still not giving a direct answer to a direct question.
Fine, let us proceed with your semantics game then:
Click to expand...

I am not playing on semantics, I am reading for comprehension words that you have not written for comprehension.


What is this alleged "reason"?
I have taken the liberty of emphasizing your use of the word so you will not miss it...
Click to expand...

It is not an alleged reason. Do you think that religion exists without a reason. That we should believe in a God for no good reason. That would be naive. We are here to be tried and tested in the flesh. It is all a part of a perfect plan of salvation. I will not bother with the details as I am sure it will fall on deaf ears.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top