• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

joelr

Well-Known Member
That’s fine but what’s that have to do with your 45k Christian sects when you don’t know the criteria to determine what a Christian Church is? What’s your definition of a sect? If a Church doesn’t hold to biblical teaching they are not a Christian Church. What’s the point other than no historical approach can determine a legit Church from a illegitimate church. The Bible is the source to determine that.
It doesn’t matter what you think of the Bible, that’s the source.


The Bible is the source? What determines salvation, faith or works?
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
No, there are both within the 45000, and the umbrella term Christianity. Though a sect would typically hold beliefs that are considered heretical, but a denomination would be an recognised, autonomous branch of Christianity. The difference is not salient to the point.
Anyone who believes that there are 45000 denominations should have a look at this.
 

paradox

(㇏(•̀ᵥᵥ•́)ノ)
Anyone who believes that there are 45000 denominations should have a look at this.
good video, I always wondered how many are there and it looks like there is no answer to this.
protestants really need centralization and someone who will speak in their name.
 
Your having this conversation with someone else. You DID say only believers can be Biblical scholars. Which is absurd.


Totally wrong. I've used scripture several times already so this point is moot.





You haven't refuted anything. Not one single thing. An amateur pastor writing internet articles doesn't debunk actual PhD historians. Even with taht you have no debunked anything? You provided a list of theologians? There are also long lists of historians who do not believe the Bible. There are long lists of Islamic theologians who do not believe the Bible.

Your personal experience claims have actually been debunked over and over. Muslims have the same experiences, emotional communication and relationship with Allah and Hindu have the same with Lord Krishna. He hears them and speaks with then daily, protects them from sin and comforts them.
Demonstrating all these feelings are in your hear only.
Answered prayer? Yes things work out for all people. Religious people use confirmation bias. If a prayer is "answered" it's a hit. If not God has a better plan. If you die, "it was your time". Yeah, Muslims also do that.

If you want to claim personal experience as evidence then have God give you a 14 digit number and tell me what it is. I know the apologetics - "God doesn't allow tests, blah blah...:" ok so personal experience isn't evidence.

I'm using all of the scholars I can find who are experts on this. Not just Carrier and Ehrman. Each historian has a specialty area.




I am up on the latest historicity scholarship, you have been unaware of 100% of it. I am familiar with the Bible. This statement is completely random, gives no evidence and sounds like a made up attack? While at the same time you are clearly unaware of any of the historical aspects of Judaism or Christianity outside of the apologetics and altered history these cults tell people.




Bart Ehrman is in favor of historicity. Carrier is a mythicist. Both have peer-reviewed work. First "historicity" means there was an actual man who the mythical narratives were based on. Mythicism means there wasn't even a person. That distinction doesn't matter here. That is history-nerd stuff for people who want to go deep.
The point here is that neither supports the supernatural stories of God and demigods, angels or anything supernatural. Those are all myths taken from previous cultures. Every nation did that back then. When Israel first started (they came from the Canaanite society) they made up Yahweh but had him married to Ashera the Goddess from Canaanite religion. Eventually they dropped the Goddess.

The Bible is as full of myths as any Tolkien book:
Christian mythology - Wikipedia



I don't know what "peer viewed" means?
Why do you keep repeating points that are completely invalid? This has already been brought up and is. really strange?
Yes there may be 100 theologians.
BUT THERE ARE ALSO 100 HISTORIANS WHO DO NOT BELIEVE THOSE MYTHS?!?!?!
THERE ARE ALSO 100 ISLAMIC SCHOLARS WHO DISAGREE? Just because there are 100 scholars does that make the Quran true????????


How many times do you need be asked this question????? Look Islamic scholars, does that mean Muslims have the true updates to Christianity???
Wow look Islamic scholars, hundreds of them all over the world! They study the Quran and Allahs words. Does that make it all true????????????
List of contemporary Islamic scholars - Wikipedia
Look converts to Islam!!!!!! They were all convinced Allah is true and speaking updates to Christianity
!
Or I could list thousands of scientists who are non-secular?
The first requirement and qualification to be considered a biblical scholar is that you are born again of the Holy Spirit because Scripture is spiritually discerned.
 
Oh are you JW? They teach things like that.
I said everyone who isn’t saved is under the influence of the kingdom of darkness, the prince and power of the air, yes. That’s Bible, JW’s are
a cult.
“And you were dead in your trespasses and sins in which you previously walked according to the ways of this world, according to the ruler of the power of the air, the spirit now working in the disobedient. We too all previously lived among them in our fleshly desires, carrying out the inclinations of our flesh and thoughts, and we were by nature children under wrath as the others were also. But God, who is rich in mercy, because of his great love that he had for us, made us alive with Christ even though we were dead in trespasses. You are saved by grace! He also raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavens in Christ Jesus, so that in the coming ages he might display the immeasurable riches of his grace through his kindness to us in Christ Jesus. For you are saved by grace through faith, and this is not from yourselves; it is God’s gift —  not from works, so that no one can boast. For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared ahead of time for us to do.”
‭‭Ephesians‬ ‭2:1-10‬ ‭CSB‬‬
 

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
Why Mithras? He wasn't a dying/rising savior demigod? I know there are online apologetics explaining how Mithras isn't like Jesus but that's because he isn't?
You're right. Mithras is nothing like Jesus.
OK, can you provide any example of a myth which is exactly like the ancient claims?
Thank you.
 
I didn't ask you about you. I asked, Do I have to know the governments of all the countries on the world to know that there are 195 of them?

This is a simple yes or no question.
It’s not a yes or no question:
The US is comprised of many state and local governments all make laws according to the Constitution or Bible in this case. If you don’t know the Constitution or Bible and what it means how can you know a legitimate gov’t of the US or a treasonous one?
 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
when someone says there are 45,000 sects of Christianity, yet don’t know the criteria that determines what a Christian Church is then you have a problem. That criteria is only found in the Bible.

That is incorrect. The Bible defines nothing for the skeptic. His criteria come from elsewhere. I have to keep reminding you that you don't determine such things except for yourself. The proper way to express that idea is to say that for you, the criteria are found only in scripture rather than that that is true for them and everybody else.

according to the Bible you are being influenced by demons or the prince and power of the air.

Isn't that a lovely thing to teach people. You're literally demonizing them, the first step toward marginalizing and dehumanizing them. Wasn't being demon-filled the justification for Jesus destroying a herd of swine?

In your thoughts, you going to accept that all your thoughts come from you? They also take advantage of the fleshly desire

The idea of demons whispering in one's ear is a Christian device used to demonize the voice of reason when it causes cognitive dissonance considering Christian doctrine. Often, this is depicted as an angel and a devil sitting on the shoulders of a person while arguing with one another through the ears.

And it's one of the many alienating and self-loathing teachings of Christianity. Also, the universe is made of base matter fit for destruction. And that one is to be separate from the world, an evil place. Also, the body is a fleshy enemy corrupting a spirit within. And yours, which depicts the mind as being infested with an enemy that need to be shut out. The secular humanist is burdened with none of those anti-spiritual concepts. Authentic spirituality derives from a sense of connection to the world, and has nothing to do with spirits like demons. The Christian worldview does just about as much violence to that connectivity with the cosmos as is possible.

It’s better to submit to God resist the devil and he will flee.

That's the church asking you to crucify your innate sense of reason and morality and to substitute its versions of what is true and what is good instead.

Humanism teaches the opposite. Man is the determiner of what is true and what is real. He has a duty to himself to take control of his own life, the be an autonomous citizen rather than a subject, and to achieve Maslow's highest need in his hierarchy of needs, self-realization, or self-actualization.

I will just leave it at you have no idea what the Bible says but talk about it anyway. Pick up a copy and start reading is my recommendation.

I've explained why believers are a poor resource for deciding what the Bible says. It's the motivated (tendentious) reasoning. The believer starts with assorted faith-based beliefs about what the Bible says even before he opens it up, such as that God is perfectly good, or that the Bible contains no errors. What use is such an opinion to one who doesn't decide such matter by faith, but by the evidence of his senses (his own eyes). He reads a biblical story and find the actions of the deity immoral. Then the believer gets to work trying to make the words conform to his preconceptions. Such words are of no value to one who processes information from evidence to sound conclusion rather than beginning with a faith-based belief.

And finally, even though I would trust an unbeliever more than a believer, I trust my own understanding of what the words in the Bible mean more than that of others just as with all other text using plain language. Unless we are talking about material written in the jargon of a profession or in unfamiliar English as with Chaucer, I think this claim that "you aren't qualified to disagree because you don't have the power to understand the words, which don't mean what you say they mean" is pretty much limited to the Bible. Think of all of the other books that people buy and read, and nobody makes that claim. They may say that the words mean more than the reader realized, the hidden message of the story or what it is intended to symbolize, but nobody claims that the words require a special spirit, for example, to understand.

The first requirement and qualification to be considered a biblical scholar is that you are born again of the Holy Spirit because Scripture is spiritually discerned.

Nope. It's that one shows expertise in matters biblical. As I alluded, I'm averse to the opinions of those trying to justify their faith-based beliefs. And scripture is discerned like any other text in a familiar language - by the language centers of the brain.

Do you even know what principles or tenets the 45K different sects you’re talking about adhere to?

What difference would it make other than that they be different interpretations of scripture, which is the point when the Christian begins talking about Christianity as a unified entity? Comedian Emo Phillips summarizes the divisiveness leading to new denominations and sects nicely in a joke:

I was walking across a bridge one day, and I saw a man standing on the edge, about to jump off. So I ran over and said, "Stop! don't do it!"

"Why shouldn't I?" he said.

I said, "Well, there's so much to live for!"

He said, "Like what?"

I said, "Well...are you religious or atheist?"

He said, "Religious."

I said, "Me too! Are you Christian or Buddhist?"

He said, "Christian."

I said, "Me too! Are you Catholic or Protestant?"

He said, "Protestant."

I said, "Me too! Are you Episcopalian or Baptist?"

He said, "Baptist!"

I said, "Wow! Me too! Are you Baptist Church of God or Baptist Church of the Lord?"

He said, "Baptist church of God!"

I said, "Me too! Are you original Baptist Church of God, or are you reformed Baptist Church of God?"

He said, "Reformed Baptist church of God!"

I said, "Me too! Are you Reformed Baptist Church of God, reformation of 1879, or Reformed Baptist Church of God, reformation of 1915?"

He said, "Reformed Baptist Church of God, reformation of 1915!"

I said, "Die, heretic scum", and pushed him off.​
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Keep pointing out your stuff and some things can’t be proven on RF.
Sorry you don’t believe the Bible is legit and a record of events, I do and will continue to use it whether you like it, agree with it or not.
Maybe, will look at some other things to prove but you probably dismiss those as well. Some things I just wait, when people are healthy and full they say all kinds of prideful things, but eventually everyone bottoms out and either curses God or cries out for help. Either case proves God though.
Have a good one.
That's a lot of words just to declare that you have no good evidence for the claims you're making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ppp

ppp

Well-Known Member
The US is comprised of many state and local governments all make laws according to the Constitution or Bible in this case. If you don’t know the Constitution or Bible and what it means how can you know a legitimate gov’t of the US or a treasonous one?
Whether you happen to think a government is legitimate or treasonous, it is still a government. So, the answer to my question, "Do I have to know the governments of all the countries on the world to know that there are 195 of them?" is no.
 
I said, "Die, heretic scum", and pushed him off.
I can’t believe you would do that the Bible says different:
“But you, beloved, building yourselves up on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Spirit, keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life. And on some have compassion, making a distinction; but others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire, hating even the garment defiled by the flesh.”
‭‭Jude‬ ‭1:20-23‬ ‭NKJV‬‬
“Deliver those who are drawn toward death, And hold back those stumbling to the slaughter. If you say, “Surely we did not know this,” Does not He who weighs the hearts consider it? He who keeps your soul, does He not know it? And will He not render to each man according to his deeds?”
‭‭Proverbs‬ ‭24:11-12‬ ‭NKJV‬‬

Also, if you want to know what it means to be an American would you ask someone from China?
That’s why the Bible is the only source for truth for everyone, skeptic or believer.
 
Last edited:

Riders

Well-Known Member
I have seen spiritual atheists in and out of 12-step recovery groups, even though it is not proof of God it is proof that spirituality works for a lot of people. Meditation is known to help people avoid hypertension, rage problems, high blood pressure, and deal with stress.
 

paradox

(㇏(•̀ᵥᵥ•́)ノ)
I have seen spiritual atheists in and out of 12-step recovery groups, even though it is not proof of God it is proof that spirituality works for a lot of people. Meditation is known to help people avoid hypertension, rage problems, high blood pressure, and deal with stress.
while this may be true it must not be reason for faith.

for example fasting every friday may be good for health, not only to solve issues with kilograms but also to get rid of toxins in the body and it's good for all hosts of things in the body.
however the only reason for us Christians is to remember Jesus' suffering since he was crucified on friday, to say that I fast because of health would be counterproductive.

likewise to say I do this or that because of health and claim my faith requires me to do it means nothing else but fooling myself and fooling God or what ever you believe is true, because even though I believe, my practices prove my belief wrong. which is nothing but belief in vain because I could do the same without faith then, and have the exact same result.
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
False dichotomy fallacy.
Justification is by faith alone (Paul)
Genuine faith in Christ produces good works.(James)

Context, joelr! :D

That may be James opinion but it isn't clear. It also suggests just belief is enough.


He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. Mark 16:16

A man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. Romans 3:28
Sirs, what must I do to be saved? And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. Acts 16:30-31
 
Top