• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

Sheldon

Veteran Member
Because their experience of being born again isn’t Scriptural but talking about that with you is fruitless so have a good one.

According to you, but not to them, why is this so hard for you to grasp? The different perspectives that the 45k varyingly different Christian sects and denominations have is subjective, that necessarily includes yours. I have explained again and again that the claim is ostensibly the same to a neutral observer, why you keep repeating the claim then is bizarre.

Again you see keen not to acknowledge that even professionals within religions, priests, pastors, nuns etc etc lose their faith. Denying they were proper Christians is of course a no true Scotsman fallacy. I guess the rationale must be a psychological defence mechanism, just deny deny deny that your experience could possibly not be what you think it is, thus when others find that to be the case, the only way you can rationalise it is to insist your experience is the one true Christian experience.

However it is a subjective claim, and I have explained exhaustively that the claim can't validate itself by mere repetition, you might as well stamp your feet. What's worse you just asserted any Christian who arrives at a different conclusion to yours might be deceived by Satan, but when I point out that rationale could be equally applied to your own experience, you immediately move away from it, unsurprisingly, since I realise such ideas are probably painful or fearful for you contemplate.
 
Last edited:

joelr

Well-Known Member
Well God delivered me and answers many prayers, sometimes the answer is no or wait.

Ha, that's funny. God answers prayers, but sometimes he doesn't so I wait until I'm satisfied in some way then I give God credit.....You just debunked prayer and this relationship with God perfectly.





I have a Covenant with God through Jesus Christ and have been born again and He gave me His Spirit who strengthens me, He promised to keep me from stumbling and will present me faultless before Him in the end. He didn’t promise an easy life though, but said His Grace would be sufficient in all circumstances. He has been faithful to that for over 30 years now.
You’re very wrong in your assessment. Maybe that’s what’s wrong, your unbelief and skepticism, don’t see that attitude working with God.

You say I'm wrong yet fail to show how and continue to sound like the origins of your story is exactly as I predicted. All you are describing is being taken in by a story. A myth. It gave you motivation, as myths do and that's it. Since that time I believe you have joined some fundamentalist group who is obsessed with being "born again".
I have debunked the phrase using Christian literature and demonstrated it just means belief. Shall we re-visit this theology lesson?

The ideas you present are Hellenistic in origin. I just read another paper on this historical fact. Things you describe right here are echoed in Greek salvation religions.

HELLENISTIC IDEAS OF SALVATION IN THE LIGHT OF ANCIENT ANTHROPOLOGY

PAUL WENDLAND
University of Gattingen, Germany

Christian and Hellenistic ideas of redemption cannot be sharply separated.

The deity's resurrection from the dead gives to the initiates, who see their own destiny prefigured in his adventures, hope of a life after death.

The consciousness of estranecment between man and God, and a longing to bridge this chasm, are fundamental to all religions of redemption. In the development of antiquity from the sixth century B.c. on, this type of thought, for which the way is already pared in the older elements of popular faith, confronts us a definite and vigorously increasing religious movement. Reformers, prophets, and puritans propagate a profounder piety, which often mystic in character. The ecstatic Dionysus religion becomes the most important factor in this development. In this religion to common people, the poor and the needy, directly attain a more profound and personal relation to the deity. The believer loses his individual consciousness in enthusiasm and receives the divinity into himself. In moments of orgiastic ecstasy he experiences the ultimate goal of his existence, abiding fellowship with the god, who, as redeemer and savior will free him through death from the finiteness, the suffering, and the exigencies of the earthly life. Orphism sets forth this religious experience in a mystic theology which exerts a strong influence upon Pindar and Empedocles, for example, and which suggested to Plato his magnificent treatise on the dest of the soul.

According to Posidonius the soul has a heavenly origin. It is an offshoot from the fiery breath of God held captive in the prison-house of the body through birth into the earthly world, but destined for return to its higher home. Only he who in life preserves the divine part from defilement will ascend after death above the lower spheres and rise to the divine source. Our reverence for the starry heaven above us and for the wonders of the cosmos proves the human soul's relation to the heavenly world, and this mystical consciousness of likeness with the divine begets an other-worldly ideal of life.

From the second century A.D. on we possess rich source materials regarding the mystery cults and the profusion of new religious developments which grow out of the syncretism of the time. These sources acquaint us with the prevailing religious tendencies of antiquity in its declining period. Purification and rebirth, mystical union of the believer with the deity and the hope of bliss in the future world, revelation and charismatic endowment which essentially constitute redemption-these are the motives dominating the rites, sacraments, faith, and teaching of this syncretism. As enjoined in the liturgy of the Phrygian mysteries.

The deity's resurrection from the dead gives to the initiates, who see their own destiny prefigured in his adventures, hope of a life after death.


….. the soul, conscious of its divine origin, strives for redemption from its foreign and unrelated companion, the body. It seeks deliverance from things sinful, material, and mortal. But the fundamental motive in these various representations is the same; it is longing for elevation above the earthly world and its ruling powers, i.e., for deification. The end of redemption is a life of eternal blessedness. The redeemer is the deity to whose service one devotes his whole life in order to obtain his help and favor.

But notions and expressions akin to Hellenistic mysticism are already present in, the Pauline doctrine of redemption. Sin is traced back to the flesh and to the natural man. According to Rom. 8:19-22 perishable, degenerate creation looks for deliverance from transitoriness and for the revelation of the sons of God. As the apostle fervently longed for freedom from the body of death (Rom. 7:24), so also redemption is for him deliverance from aiv e'VeCrd, (Gal. 1:4). This leaning toward a "physical" and cosmic extension of redemption is an approach to Hellenistic conceptions. Paul's representa- tion of the believer as living and suffering in Christ, as crucified, buried, and raised with him, recalls the similar way in which the Hellenistic mystery-religions relate the believer to the dead and risen god (Attis, Osiris, Adonis). Thus Paul actually appears to be indebted to Hellenistic mysticism for certain suggestions. As Plato used Orphism, so Paul appropriated forms of expression for his faith from the mysticism of the world to which he preached the gospel.

The relationship of Christianity to Hellenism appears closer in the Ephesian letter. Here Christ is the supreme power of the entire spirit-world, exalting believers above the bondage of the inferior spirits into his upper kingdom (1: 18-22). Christians must struggle with these spirits, among whom the sKoopoipdrope6 (astral spirits) are named. In like manner from the second century on Christ is more frequently extolled as a deliverer from the power of fate.' When Ignatius regards Christ's work as the communication of ryv^oaR and &0c9apria, and the Eucharist as food of immortality, he, like the author of the Fourth Gospel, shows the influence of Greek mysticism. Irenaeus' realistic doctrine of redemption also has, in common with Greek mysticism, the fundamental notions of deification, abolition of death, imperishability, and gnosis.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
Well God delivered me and answers many prayers, sometimes the answer is no or wait.
That's so obviously selection bias, it's hard to know what to say. There is no objective evidence a deity answered any prayers, and when these claims have been objectively tested they fail to demonstrate any results discernible from random luck.
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
My experience with God is all the evidence I need, not trying to prove or convince anyone but just a witness to the Truth, everyone can decide for themselves.
And Muslims and Hindu have their experience as all the evidence they need. I've seen it personally. That proves nothing except a story has moved you emotionally and psychologically.


Don’t see anything you offer worth considering for any kind of help or solutions for this life or for eternity.

Because no one has offered any help? There are many paths, religions, cults, philosophy, meditation, and so on.

Eternity is the same for everyone no matter what your Greek myth tells you.



-
According to Posidonius the deity's resurrection from the dead gives to the initiates, ............... hope of a life after death.
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
It’s the Bible brother, it’s what God says. If a person claims to be a Christian then that definition is according to the Bible and not some other meaning.
It doesn’t really matter to me either way except if someone thought they were a Christian yet never experienced the intimate relationship with God when He gives you a song in the night or a Word for your situation, or provides for you when you thought all hope was lost, or restoring relationships you had no answer or hope to restore. He is awesome like that.


Actually he's a bit weak because all that has happened to me just from a 100% secular life? Incredible coincidences and 2nd chances that were seemingly impossible. Yet stuff happens.
When one is religious they give a God credit.
Confirmation bias.

And sure, let's use the Bible definition. Born again means you are a believer.
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
Well you are saying you believe in God so that would rule you out because I was addressing the person who said they were a Christian yet don’t believe there is a God at all. This can’t be so because in order for a person to be born again they had to receive God’s Spirit. When a person is born again there is no doubt about God at all, you know He is real and starts talking to you.


If you get words from a deity then that sounds like an exaggeration. However if you are going to make the claim then I will ask for proof. Ask God for 8 numbers. Or 9. Then write them down.
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
Imagining what exactly? That I was free from my addictions in five minutes and other things God speaks to me. It’s not a feeling or an imagination. If that’s what you had, you got a counterfeit.


"Islam provided him with a different viewpoint about life, and gave him direction, and made him value his health and life. He hasn’t drunk since he took his shahadah,
Allah’s grace and mercy helped him maintain his sobriety fairly easily. He says that drugs and alcohol just simply became revolting to him as if the desire was completely erased from his mind."


If God speaks ask him for 8 numbers.
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
A lot of people are baptized and not saved, I was and then I actually got saved and was born again, there’s a big difference.


See, told you, you are involved with a "now you are saved" born again group. Because in real Christianity, according to scripture those who believe are saved.
 

joelr

Well-Known Member
And you missed the point, big time. I don’t care who left or are atheists now. The point is some people believe they had a relationship with God and may not have had one at all, they may have just rejected the fellowship, the Pastor or other religious people who taught them something not even in the Bible. Then what? Never question that and realize they may have missed God altogether and just ran into the arms of the devil for comfort instead. Deceived by the abuser and run right into his arms like he is the hero.

No Bart Ehrman was a born again fundamentalist. He studied history and realized the "relationship" was all in his mind. IF you want to demonstrate a relationship with a deity that isn't just your imagination then you need evidence. Not the same claims Muslims and Hindus make. Or your weak ad-hoc post rationalization that an actual pastor was really with a devil all this time.
Someone who actually gets modern Christianity might say they lost their way but would have compassion, not make exorcist comparisons. That sounds very cult-y.
 
That's so obviously selection bias, it's hard to know what to say. There is no objective evidence a deity answered any prayers, and when these claims have been objectively tested they fail to demonstrate any results discernible from random luck.
So… I guess you don’t know what prayer is or the purpose of prayer. Looking at prayer from your perspective I can see why you think the way you do.
The purpose of prayer is to communicate with God, to know Him and get His perspective on things, not to get your own way or twist Gods arm to get what you want.
 
No Bart Ehrman was a born again fundamentalist. He studied history and realized the "relationship" was all in his mind. IF you want to demonstrate a relationship with a deity that isn't just your imagination then you need evidence. Not the same claims Muslims and Hindus make. Or your weak ad-hoc post rationalization that an actual pastor was really with a devil all this time.
Someone who actually gets modern Christianity might say they lost their way but would have compassion, not make exorcist comparisons. That sounds very cult-y.
What’s your point, seems you’re arguing with yourself or an imaginary person.
 
See, told you, you are involved with a "now you are saved" born again group. Because in real Christianity, according to scripture those who believe are saved.
Yeah Jesus Christ and the apostles are the born again group John 3, Acts 2, Romans 8, and others
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
So… I guess you don’t know what prayer is or the purpose of prayer. Looking at prayer from your perspective I can see why you think the way you do.
The purpose of prayer is to communicate with God, to know Him and get His perspective on things, not to get your own way or twist Gods arm to get what you want.
It is the religions that do not appear to know what prayer is for. They will not give a clear and consistent explanation. The religious are the ones that claim prayer has healing power. A rational person says: "Okay, let's test that.". When prayer inevitably fails that test it is the religious that change their minds and say " prayer is not for that".

Can you give your claim of what prayer can do.
 
It is the religions that do not appear to know what prayer is for. They will not give a clear and consistent explanation. The religious are the ones that claim prayer has healing power. A rational person says: "Okay, let's test that.". When prayer inevitably fails that test it is the religious that change their minds and say " prayer is not for that".

Can you give your claim of what prayer can do.
Prayer doesn’t have healing power, go pray all day to that rock if you want, or that statue. It’s God that heals, prayer is how I communicate with God.
Your kind of prayer and what the other posters are saying about prayer is more like witchcraft.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Prayer doesn’t have healing power, go pray all day to that rock if you want, or that statue. It’s God that heals, prayer is how I communicate with God.
Your kind of prayer and what the other posters are saying about prayer is more like witchcraft.
Why do you keep getting it wrong? It is not my kind of prayer. I don't make any positive claims about prayer. That is something Christians do.
 
According to you, but not to them, why is this so hard for you to grasp? The different perspectives that the 45k varyingly different Christian sects and denominations have is subjective, that necessarily includes yours. I have explained again and again that the claim is ostensibly the same to a neutral observer, why you keep repeating the claim then is bizarre.

Again you see keen not to acknowledge that even professionals within religions, priests, pastors, nuns etc etc lose their faith. Denying they were proper Christians is of course a no true Scotsman fallacy. I guess the rationale must be a psychological defence mechanism, just deny deny deny that your experience could possibly not be what you think it is, thus when others find that to be the case, the only way you can rationalise it is to insist your experience is the one true Christian experience.

However it is a subjective claim, and I have explained exhaustively that the claim can't validate itself by mere repetition, you might as well stamp your feet. What's worse you just asserted any Christian who arrives at a different conclusion to yours might be deceived by Satan, but when I point out that rationale could be equally applied to your own experience, you immediately move away from it, unsurprisingly, since I realise such ideas are probably painful or fearful for you contemplate.
You should write a book on how to successfully argue with yourself and against a strawman and still lose.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
So… I guess you don’t know what prayer is or the purpose of prayer.

Oh dear, it seems to be unevidenced non sequitur time again.

Looking at prayer from your perspective I can see why you think the way you do.

Rationally and without your selection bias you mean?

The purpose of prayer is to communicate with God, to know Him and get His perspective on things, not to get your own way or twist Gods arm to get what you want.

Straw man fallacy, and you have spectacularly missed the point again. lets try again shall we, this was your claim:

ElishaElijah said:
Well God delivered me and answers many prayers, sometimes the answer is no or wait.

This was my reply, now please note here NB your diatribe on what prayer is and does is irrelevant, since I made no direct comment on either.
Sheldon said:
That's so obviously selection bias, it's hard to know what to say. There is no objective evidence a deity answered any prayers, and when these claims have been objectively tested they fail to demonstrate any results discernible from random luck.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
It is the religions that do not appear to know what prayer is for. They will not give a clear and consistent explanation. The religious are the ones that claim prayer has healing power. A rational person says: "Okay, let's test that.". When prayer inevitably fails that test it is the religious that change their minds and say " prayer is not for that".

Can you give your claim of what prayer can do.
The real irony is I made no comment about what prayer is or does, he simply made an inaccurate claim, and ignored the point I had made, about his claim being an obvious example of selection bias, namely that he claimed a deity had answered many of his prayers, but sometimes the answer was no or wait. As I said, it's hard to know what to say to anyone who can't see the obvious selection bias there.

I have a pair of lucky pants, sometimes they work sometimes they don't.

How do you know it's not just random luck?

Damn it, time for new pants. :D
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
Prayer doesn’t have healing power, go pray all day to that rock if you want, or that statue. It’s God that heals, prayer is how I communicate with God.

Why are you telling this to an atheist? You may want to let the catholic church know though, they can close Lourdes down.
Your kind of prayer and what the other posters are saying about prayer is more like witchcraft.

FYI, those are not atheistic notions of prayer, they're theistic notions of prayer that differ from yours. Though I think comparing intercessory prayer to witchcraft is a pretty accurate analogy FWIW, so kudos.
 
Top