Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I know. I forgot the phrase "even begin to".Even then he would still have to demonstrate that this deity answered people who prayed, before his claim was anything but a meaningless subjective opinion.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I know. I forgot the phrase "even begin to".Even then he would still have to demonstrate that this deity answered people who prayed, before his claim was anything but a meaningless subjective opinion.
In correct. You do not know what the term "Spinoza's God" means.See post #475 - There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?
He believed in a revealed God. So not an Atheist.
There was a letter that he wrote to I believe a Roman Catholic priest of some sort saying something on the order of "you may think of me as an atheist". I will have to see if I can find it.I'm inclined to agree, but try to leave poor Albert alone, as he seems to be (perhaps predictably) everyone's favourite appeal to authority fallacy. The point was to refute the ludicrous claim that only theists have wisdom, incidentally a claim made without even the pretence of evidence, who then ironically demanded I list people with wisdom, who were not theists.
You know, I think this question is not so much about theistic belief, but much more generally about why humans believe a lot of the things that they do -- often not just without evidence, but in the face of much evidence to the contrary! And yet, this is quintessentially a part of human nature -- we do it, and we do it a lot.I’ve been reading through a couple of threads, and I see that it is said that there is no evidence for a god, it’s an unfalsifiable idea. We all agree on this? If you don’t, care to explain the evidence there is for god?
I’m in agreement. I used to believe my personal experiences to be subjective evidence for god, but I know now that’s not the case. I am not a theist anymore because I recognize I was a Christian thanks almost completely to my environment. That’s why I believed. I was brought up in it. Wasn’t because of any proof or anything,
So, theists, why do you believe? Is it mainly because of your environment and geographical location? There is no proof for god (right?), so what logically keeps you believing? Or is logic not supposed to be a factor when it comes to faith? Is it too jarring, the idea of leaving the comfort that religion and belief in a god brings?
I am curious about personal evaluations on why you believe. It can’t be because of logic, as there is no proof of god, right?
On 24 April 1929, Einstein cabled Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein in German: "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."In correct. You do not know what the term "Spinoza's God" means.
Not to worry, a far more troubling claim from @Wildswanderer is this one:I know. I forgot the phrase "even begin to".
Wildswanderer said: ↑
If a baby is occupying your body, you did something to cause that situation.
Equivocation fallacy.On 24 April 1929, Einstein cabled Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein in German: "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."
He believed in a revealed God.
So you get to make ludicrous and sweeping unevidenced claims, that only theists have wisdom, and when I point out what a spectacularly stupid claim it is I have to name all the atheists who possess wisdom? Hilarious, you do know that atheism is far among scientists and university post graduates, and much higher among elite scientists? How about Einstein, he not a theist, he was pretty disparaging about the bible and Abrahamic religions.
OK, you have no wisdom people. That's OK.
Wisdom
noun
Try again.
- the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgement; the quality of being wise.
You see?
I have been reading your messages. I like them, not by their content but by you showing to be a very smart guy.
But you won't beat a guy with wisdom, forget about it. I have put you in trouble very easy, just asking you your list of wise people.
Wisdom, as the definition posted by you, thank you very much for your contribution. -I will give a "like" for that-, is much more than knowledge.
When you acquire wisdom no one can beat you. Look at that guy Yeshu (Jesus), he danced the Macarena on their opponents.
He also have a great judgement, more experience than anyone. Like you came to him with an issue, that issue was a piece of cake to be solved by him.
I truly would like for you to acquire wisdom, you have potential, a great potential, but unfortunately your rejection to a higher knowledge impedes you to reach it.
You just can't see He is there.
Jesus Christ is the Truth, so what is your truth exactly?
Sorry, but you do not appear to have wisdom. Did you not see that knowledge is necessary to have wisdom? So far you have only demonstrated belief and a lack of knowledge.You see?
I have been reading your messages. I like them, not by their content but by you showing to be a very smart guy.
But you won't beat a guy with wisdom, forget about it. I have put you in trouble very easy, just asking you your list of wise people.
Wisdom, as the definition posted by you, thank you very much for your contribution. -I will give a "like" for that-, is much more than knowledge.
When you acquire wisdom no one can beat you. Look at that guy Yeshu (Jesus), he danced the Macarena on their opponents.
He also have a great judgement, more experience than anyone. Like you came to him with an issue, that issue was a piece of cake to be solved by him.
I truly would like for you to acquire wisdom, you have potential, a great potential, but unfortunately your rejection to a higher knowledge impedes you to reach it.
You just can't see He is there.
First, I think you are misusing the word reveal here, to ascribe to Einstein something it is excessively unlikely (from his own writings) that he believed, and second, I also suspect that you haven't actually read and understood Spinoza.On 24 April 1929, Einstein cabled Rabbi Herbert S. Goldstein in German: "I believe in Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind."
He believed in a revealed God.
And that, by Einstein, is what I call "true wisdom."Do several things at once, so I have not found the letter that I am thinking of, but this source makes his lack of belief in a god rather clear:
10 Quotes by Albert Einstein on Personal Gods and Prayer
As for denying an atheist, this is the quote that caused that. If you read it he only did not like certain atheists of his time:
"I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being."
Your answer reminds me a story I read long ago.I guess that depends on who is doing the definition.
Most people pray and don't expect a response.
Sometimes prayers are the same. Sometimes you pray giving thanks for your happiness, or because a friend is sick. You don't expect a miracle as the answer, you just told the God how you feel at that moment, and have that kind of peace after your have released your feelings, your thoughts, your good intentions.
There is no need for an answer from the God, but knowing that you have Him always with you. That is also a bless.
Mostly you make unevidenced claims, then dodge the responses with non-sequitur's like this.
I'm not trying to prove God exists. I'm explaining what people believe.No, sorry, it is only claimed to be that. You can't claim that until you prove that your God exists.
You obviously missed or ignored my post then.Not to worry, a far more troubling claim from @Wildswanderer is this one:
He has refused to admit that victims of rape have done nothing to "cause the situation".
He is the absolute standard of Truth. If there's no such standard, truth doesn't actually exist, only opinion.What does it even mean to say 'Jesus is the Truth'? At its very face, it seems like nonsense.
Truth is an abstract property of certain statements: a statement can be true or false.
Jesus was, supposedly, a human that lived about 200 years ago that was also God.
So 'Truth' and 'Jesus Christ' aren't even in the same *category* of object as far as I can see.
Then you should make that clearer. As written it was a claim. All you need to do is to preface your beliefs with an "I believe that"I'm not trying to prove God exists. I'm explaining what people believe.