Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
So now you just redefine science to fit what you want.Nope. That was when religion was in control and well before the rise of modern science.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So now you just redefine science to fit what you want.Nope. That was when religion was in control and well before the rise of modern science.
Galileo was opposing what was the accepted science at the time.That was always a wives tale or cultural myth.
I'm sure Copernicus and Galileo smashed that at the dawn of the modern scientific age.
I have, seems you got some bad intelSorry, newsflash. Moses is fictitious and those books are younger than the book of Job.
Why haven't you ever looked into the history of the Bible?
More like an accepted view promoted by many religions. What we know as science did not exist at the time, but Galileo was basal to it.Galileo was opposing what was the accepted science at the time.
What makes you think that the Gospels are "first hand accounts"?This isn
Well their first hand accounts and the message of the Gospel actually does happen to a person when they receive Eternal Life through Jesus Christ. If I didn’t I wouldn’t be saying it did, I’d still be a drug addict, be dead, in jail or some institution. But what happened is that I was born again and that is no pipe dream, myth or fantasy.
“That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life— the life was manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and declare to you that eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us— that which we have seen and heard we declare to you, that you also may have fellowship with us; and truly our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ. And these things we write to you that your joy may be full.”
I John 1:1-4 NKJV
He was using a methodology closer to modern science. Ptolemaic "science" began losing its ground around Galileo and Copernicus prior to him.Galileo was opposing what was the accepted science at the time.
I have, seems you got some bad intel
No, the modern scientific method first began to be developed during the time of Galileo. The word "scientist" is even younger than that.So now you just redefine science to fit what you want.
At that time it was considered "Natural philosophy". He was one of the early users of experiment.Galileo was opposing what was the accepted science at the time.
No you only think you do. It's quite possible we are wrong about the very shape of reality.We don't need to know *everything* in order to know *something*. And we do know some things about the universe.
I would recommend that you do not bet your life on it the next time that you come to a cliff.No you only think you do. It's quite possible we are wrong about the very shape of reality.
There's architectural evidence for the stories Moses wrote.Sorry, newsflash. Moses is fictitious and those books are younger than the book of Job.
Where?There's architectural evidence for the stories Moses wrote.
All I have to do is figure out how to change myself from a solid to energy which science illustrates is possible.would recommend that you do not bet your life on it the next time that you come to a cliff.
For one example:Where?
EDIT: And please, real "architectural" evidence.
Where’s the myth part? I don’t know any believers who don’t believe the Exodus happened just as it’s written in Scripture. Unbelievers do probably because they’re easily fooled.Backwards again. Archaeologists have known that the Exodus story was myth since the 19th century.
There are times that the lack of evidence is evidence against. They have found evidence of much smaller and older migrations but there is no evidence of the migration from Egypt. It never happened.
The Pentateuch was largely written during the Babylonian exile. But don't trust me, trust your fellow Christians:
When was Genesis Written and Why Does it Matter? - Articles
The title mentions Genesis, but the article is about the entire Pentateuch.
It wasn't just accepted by religion but by most everyone at the time.More like an accepted view promoted by many religions. What we know as science did not exist at the time, but Galileo was basal to it.
Things like skepticism and critical thinking aren't "easily fooled". Literalism, on the other hand.Unbelievers do probably because they’re easily fooled.
You are a member of a rather extreme, almost cult, it sounds like. There is no doubt among those that have studied the matter. Did you not check out the Christian link that I provided?Where’s the myth part? I don’t know any believers who don’t believe the Exodus happened just as it’s written in Scripture. Unbelievers do probably because they’re easily fooled.
And not even called "science" at that time.It wasn't just accepted by religion but by most everyone at the time.