• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

There is no evidence for God, so why do you believe?

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
Can people get results other ways, seems like it.
God did for me in 5 minutes what I couldn’t do by first delivering me from my addictions, which enabled me to get to the root of why I drank and drugged to begin with by cleaning house and taking a moral inventory, making amends. This resulted in a clear conscience. Was born again and received Eternal Life and the power to change, live a godly life and also help people who are in a similar situation as I was.
I love God’s ways:


“Have you not known? Have you not heard? The everlasting God, the Lord, The Creator of the ends of the earth, Neither faints nor is weary. His understanding is unsearchable. He gives power to the weak, And to those who have no might He increases strength. Even the youths shall faint and be weary, And the young men shall utterly fall, But those who wait on the Lord Shall renew their strength; They shall mount up with wings like eagles, They shall run and not be weary, They shall walk and not faint.”
‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭40:28-31‬ ‭NKJV‬‬
This is neither argument nor evidence.

In the first paragraph, you are making a claim that cannot stand up to any scrutiny. If you cannot say how God is supposed to have delivered, you cannot even legitimately claim that He did. This is just, "Oh, something happened I can't explain, so I guess God did it." No.

And in the second paragraph, you are merely preaching using scripture. It is evidence of nothing at all, except that somebody wrote a book called Isaiah once.
 
This is neither argument nor evidence.

In the first paragraph, you are making a claim that cannot stand up to any scrutiny. If you cannot say how God is supposed to have delivered, you cannot even legitimately claim that He did. This is just, "Oh, something happened I can't explain, so I guess God did it." No.

And in the second paragraph, you are merely preaching using scripture. It is evidence of nothing at all, except that somebody wrote a book called Isaiah once.
Except I have explained it so what don’t you understand?
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
We followers of Spinoza see our God in the wonderful order and lawfulness of all that exists and in its soul ("Beseeltheit") as it reveals itself in man and animal. It is a different question whether belief in a personal God should be contested. Freud endorsed this view in his latest publication. I myself would never engage in such a task. For such a belief seems to me preferable to the lack of any transcendental outlook of life, and I wonder whether one can ever successfully render to the majority of mankind a more sublime means in order to satisfy its metaphysical needs. (Einstein)

"The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."
Einstein.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
Well you do believe the Bible is propaganda so…your comment is expected.

That's a lie. Instead of creating endless straw man fallacies, why not address what I actually said for once? Like you citing a creationist website, using lies and propaganda and pretending this challenges the overwhelming archaeological evidence that falsifies the Exodus myth.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
I believe you are correct. Evidence of God is not scientific evidence and never will be.

Now can you work out why that might be the case?

Clue for you, there is no scientific evidence for mermaids, or unicorns, or leprechauns or garden fairies etc etc etc..take your time...:cool:

Science isn't the standard for truth, it is just one tool to gain understanding,

Straw man fallacy, as it wasn't I cited science here, it was @Muffled ...I merely extrapolated his claim. You can't blame science for not finding unicorns...
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
Except I have explained it so what don’t you understand?
I imagine it's your inability to differentiate between a bare unevidenced claim, that has no explanatory powers whatsoever, because it is an appeal to mystery, and a genuine explanation.
 
That's a lie. Instead of creating endless straw man fallacies, why not address what I actually said for once? Like you citing a creationist website, using lies and propaganda and pretending this challenges the overwhelming archaeological evidence that falsifies the Exodus myth.
So you don’t think the Bible is propaganda and I must’ve misunderstood so what is the Bible to you?
 
I imagine it's your inability to differentiate between a bare unevidenced claim, that has no explanatory powers whatsoever, because it is an appeal to mystery, and a genuine explanation.
Whether it’s my inability or maybe some people just can’t grasp spiritual matters and to them it’s a mystery.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
By "spiritual matters" do you mean wishful thinking?
A spiritual practice or spiritual discipline (often including spiritual exercises) is the regular or full-time performance of actions and activities undertaken for the purpose of inducing spiritual experiences and cultivating spiritual development.
 
Top