Let’s see, before I met God debt, wrecked cars, over due bills, in trouble with the law, worry, pain, sexual disease, unwanted pregnancy, theft, isolation from society.
After prayer and God’s deliverance, peace, purpose, success in life, marriage, health, relationships restored, provision for family of 16, 25 years of marriage, Eternal Life, Hope, Contentment.
If this is a matter of a trick of psychology or just try harder and tough it out then go ahead and try, but I found that when God intervenes some is effortless, some isn’t but He gives supernatural power to overcome.
OK. You have presented a phenomenon: going from debt, bills, theft, isolation, trouble with the law, worry, pain, sexual disease, unwanted pregnancy to peace, a feeling of purpose, success in life, marriage, health, restored relationships, ability to take care of a family, etc.
I'm limiting these to the things that can be observed by others.
You have proposed that this phenomenon can be explained by the intervention of a supernatural creator God.
Some questions that immediately arise:
1. Have other people made similar changes in their lives?
2. How common are such changes?
3. Do all who experience such changes attribute the changes to the same deity that you do?
4. if not, do people in different societies attribute the changes to the deities of their culture?
5. Have any people had such changes and *not* attributed the changes to any deity?
6. Do the changes last equivalent time periods for different attributions?
7. What other things are in common in people who have had such changes?
8. By what mechanism do you propose that this deity affected the changes?
now, in order for your particular hypothesis (your particular deity affected these changes) to be the best explanation, it should be the case that most, if not all, people who have had equivalent changes also attribute those changes to the same deity.
Do you think this is likely to be the case? Do you agree that it is an appropriate initial test for your hypothesis?
Also, if your hypothesis is correct, the likelihood that the changes will be lasting for those that give the same attribution as you should be better than for those who do not give such an attribution.
Do you think this is likely to be the case? Do you agree it is an appropriate test for your hypothesis?
And, again, if your hypothesis is correct, those from other societies who do not attribute their changes to your deity should be fewer and have poorer long term results.
Do you think this is likely to be the case? Do you agree it is an appropriate test of your hypothesis?