paarsurrey
Veteran Member
Nobody invented the religion, please. If yes please name the person and the year it was invented,please.
Regards
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"There is nothing that atheism (on its own) claims is 'right.' "?
- Thread starter paarsurrey
- Start date
Regards
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
What are you here for?
Feel free to provide any clues to help rewrite history.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
That is not a comprehensive answer. Which is okay. I know it is tiring to explain sub things whether you do it correct or not. But I cannot - and you cannot expect me to - take your notion seiously if you cannot explain it.
Please provide your evidence for your claim that religion was not an invention of man.
Or explain how you think it came about
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
Are you laughing?
Atheism is a lack of belief or disbelief in God or gods. That's right.
paarsurrey
Veteran Member
In other words one was wrong to make that claim. It is OK with me.
Regards
So you are saying definitions are ok only if they score points in your favour but not if they disagree with your silly games?
If you are not willing to educator yourself what makes you think i can educate you?
Frater Sisyphus
Contradiction, irrationality and disorder
No, Atheism is a claim to the nature of reality and the universe but is not generally a prescribed belief (in the sense that the only universal claim is that any or all God's and concepts of God are false). It still is a belief (whether an atheist would admit it or not) that assumes in itself a self-validation in the assessment of the nature of the universe in a self-perceived "rational" lens, often favoring materialism. (on the extreme but not uncommon side of the spectrum, is those who treat Science religiously, as an unquestionable infallible authority)
If one simply doesn't believe in a God but makes no claim about the existence or non-existence of "God", then they would be an agnostic.
All reality-tunnels are flawed though, regardless of whether there is a belief in God involved or not.
If one simply doesn't believe in a God but makes no claim about the existence or non-existence of "God", then they would be an agnostic.
All reality-tunnels are flawed though, regardless of whether there is a belief in God involved or not.
Sometimes yes, the silliness of people trying to change the world just to massage their personnel foibles is really very funny
In others words history makes the claim, if you don't like it the history changed but don't insult me because it doesn't agree with your dream
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
I can't hear that laugh. Must be fake.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
Why do you make it personal?
Listen closely
So you make a statement and you would prefer i didn't query you motives for making that statement
Interesting -- Link?
Clarify "signs of civilization," Please?
Haven't anthropologists noted religious practices in every culture, including primitive, hunter-gatherers?
As I understand it, civilization is a type of social organization, characterised by permanent location, a social hierarchy including occupational specialisation, full-time religious specialists, monumental architecture and writing.
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
That's not the same
Shushersbedamned
Well-Known Member
Here you are again. You 'e the one trying to insult. The rest of us on most part are trying to communicate.