• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Threads about Atheism and what it is.

We have a handbook? Why wasn’t I issued the handbook? I filled out all my atheist registration forms. :rolleyes:

Oxford handbooks are collections of scholarly texts organised on a common theme and published by Oxford University Press. One such theme is atheism.

"Oxford Handbooks offer authoritative and up-to-date surveys of original research in a particular subject area. Specially commissioned essays from leading figures in the discipline give critical examinations of the progress and direction of debates, as well as a foundation for future research. Oxford Handbooks provide scholars and graduate students with compelling new perspectives upon a wide range of subjects in the humanities and social sciences."


Definitions” 3 through 5 above are responses only to monotheism. 3 and 5 go a step further (narrower?) by only being responses to monotheistic gods named “God.”

So? Write a letter of complaint to the cited authors.

The quote was there to show diversity of opinion in best usage, even among scholars, because some people here think there is only one possible use and everyone who disagrees is either incredibly stupid or rabidly agenda driven. That people could simply have different opinions on a subjective issue seems not to be an option many have considered.

Do you consider a polytheist an atheist?

You know the answer to this.

More to the point, do you think that people in general consider polytheists atheists?

Ask them.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
Never... Wow tell that to some of your buddies.

Like you are telling me that atheists don't try to stop people from believing? :tearsofjoy:
You are pretty cool Christine!

Thank you KenS for your confession, I was just thinking "NEVER ... this can't be true. And a Pastor can't hold up a lie too long I think."
So you were 1 step ahead of me. Good on you.

But I can tell you, I never try to "stop people from believing" NOR "tell them to believe"
I tell the atheist "good on you, become the best atheist"
I tell the theist "good on you, become the best theist"
 
Last edited:

stvdv

Veteran Member
Atheism, by strict definition, states: disbelief in god(s)
Antitheism, by strict definition, says against belief in god(s)
Not all atheist are antitheist. In my opinion, if an atheist were anti-theist, I wouldnt know which god(s) he is against if he believes they dont exist
Not all antitheist are atheist. Many are against god(s) even tbough they believe they exist.

It's getting quite tricky. So at least (atheist can't be an antitheist) & (antitheist can't be an atheist)
That makes sense, you can't be against something if you don't believe it exists.
I wonder how long it will take for the atheists to beat the 34000 denominations Christians have
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
It seems that this concept varies. Non evidenced belief is very highly valued in for example, some Biblical belief systems.
I have heard some 'religious' people express your sentiment, though.
I would put high value on non evidenced belief, that is traditional, for me.

The word "hubris" comes to mind.

We are talking here about verses John 20:19-29
I believe everyone interprets this verse wrong. When you read all these verses very careful and when you can read between the lines you see a complete different meaning of this verse. Which makes sense for a "true Christian" as well as a "true Buddhist" IMHO.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Thank you KenS for your confession, I was just thinking "NEVER ... this can't be true. And a Pastor can't hold up a lie too long I think."
So you were 1 step ahead of me. Good on you.

But I can tell you, I never try to "stop people from believing" NOR "tell them to believe"
I tell the atheist "good on you, become the best atheist"
I tell the theist "good on you, become the best theist"
:D

I couldn't help but make that statement. It keeps things light.

I think we have the same position. Everyone has every right to think as they want to think. The options are out there but Jesus never said "Force them to believe"... actually he said "Come to me those who are thirsty"... sounds like a "free to believe" offer to me.
 

stvdv

Veteran Member
:D
I couldn't help but make that statement. It keeps things light.

I think we have the same position. Everyone has every right to think as they want to think. The options are out there but Jesus never said "Force them to believe"... actually he said "Come to me those who are thirsty"... sounds like a "free to believe" offer to me.

Yes, I understand that it's good to keep things light. But our conscience luckily doesn't let us get away with "white lies" or "light untruth" anymore:)

That would be fantastic. I believe "All religions are pathways to God. And Atheism and humanism are not excluded". Because all have "Love" in them. And therefore I believe "There is one religion, the religion of Love". And I know this truth also:"Judge one of God's children and I judge God".

I am glad we have the same position here
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Like you are telling me that atheists don't try to stop people from believing? :tearsofjoy:

You are pretty cool Christine!

Can't speak for all, but most will try to explain their viewpoint which is difficult if you have no common frame of reference. Perhaps you see this as attempts to persuade
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
There are so many different types of christians. Im wondering what constitutes christianity anymore.

50,000+ (and growing daily) sects, 200+ English language versions of the bible (who knows how many in other languages?). Each sect interpreting the version of the bible they choose as theirs in their own particular way. Is it any wonder chrisianity is so fragmented
 
Top