Those would be the fundamentalists i assume, the ones who judge in the name of God with condemnation to try to save souls?
Im no fundamentalist.
Nope, just ordinary, everyday christians
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Those would be the fundamentalists i assume, the ones who judge in the name of God with condemnation to try to save souls?
Im no fundamentalist.
We have a handbook? Why wasn’t I issued the handbook? I filled out all my atheist registration forms.
Definitions” 3 through 5 above are responses only to monotheism. 3 and 5 go a step further (narrower?) by only being responses to monotheistic gods named “God.”
Do you consider a polytheist an atheist?
More to the point, do you think that people in general consider polytheists atheists?
LOL... NEVER... i just try to stop you from converting us and to diss us
Like you are telling me that atheists don't try to stop people from believing?Never... Wow tell that to some of your buddies.
Nope, just ordinary, everyday christians
Never... Wow tell that to some of your buddies.
Like you are telling me that atheists don't try to stop people from believing?
You are pretty cool Christine!
It is a bad sign that in general atheists are easily annoyed.
Atheism, by strict definition, states: disbelief in god(s)
Antitheism, by strict definition, says against belief in god(s)
Not all atheist are antitheist. In my opinion, if an atheist were anti-theist, I wouldnt know which god(s) he is against if he believes they dont exist
Not all antitheist are atheist. Many are against god(s) even tbough they believe they exist.
It seems that this concept varies. Non evidenced belief is very highly valued in for example, some Biblical belief systems.
I have heard some 'religious' people express your sentiment, though.
I would put high value on non evidenced belief, that is traditional, for me.
The word "hubris" comes to mind.
Thank you KenS for your confession, I was just thinking "NEVER ... this can't be true. And a Pastor can't hold up a lie too long I think."
So you were 1 step ahead of me. Good on you.
But I can tell you, I never try to "stop people from believing" NOR "tell them to believe"
I tell the atheist "good on you, become the best atheist"
I tell the theist "good on you, become the best theist"
Anyone and everyone who feels the ill advised consequences of their beliefs, of course.Atheism shouldnt be anything controversial. Anti theism is. I mean who are the theists hurting anyways?
I couldn't help but make that statement. It keeps things light.
I think we have the same position. Everyone has every right to think as they want to think. The options are out there but Jesus never said "Force them to believe"... actually he said "Come to me those who are thirsty"... sounds like a "free to believe" offer to me.
Australia is full of atheists?Australia is full of atheists. Is our reputation on of being easily annoyed?
Sweden? Finland? New Zealand?
Methinks your prejudice is showing.
Like you are telling me that atheists don't try to stop people from believing?
You are pretty cool Christine!
There are so many different types of christians. Im wondering what constitutes christianity anymore.
No. That's not it.Can't speak for all, but most will try to explain their viewpoint which is difficult if you have no common frame of reference. Perhaps you see this as attempts to persuade
I didn't decide anything - I simply informed you that your insinuation is incorrect.Perhaps you could ask @KenS for his views rather than deciding for him
I didn't decide anything - I simply informed you that your insinuation is incorrect.
Have it any way you like. Just stop talking for a moment and staining the silence.So you not only speak for @KenS, you also assume to speak for all atheists.