Serpent's seed[edit]
Further information:
Serpent Seed and
Original Sin
Branham taught an unorthodox doctrine of the source of
original sin.
[126] He believed the story of the
fall of man in the
Garden of Eden is allegorical and interpreted it to mean the
serpent had sexual intercourse with Eve and that their offspring was
Cain.
[126] Branham taught that Cain's modern descendants were masquerading as educated people and scientists,
[147] and that Cain's descendants were "a big religious bunch of illegitimate ******* children"
[148][67] who comprised the majority of society's criminals.
[149] He believed the serpent was the
missing link between the
chimpanzee and man, and speculated that the serpent was possibly a human-like giant.
[150] Branham held the belief that the serpent was transformed into a reptile after it was cursed by God.
[150] Weaver commented on Branham's interpretation of the story; "Consequently every woman potentially carried the literal seed of the devil".
[141]
Branham first spoke about original sin in 1958; he rejected the orthodox view of the subject and hinted at his own belief in a hidden meaning to the story.
[151] In later years, he made his opinion concerning the sexual nature of the fall explicitly known.
[151] Weaver wrote that Branham may have become acquainted with serpent's seed doctrine through his Baptist roots;
Daniel Parker, an American Baptist minister from Kentucky, promulgated a
similar doctrine in the mid-1800s.
[148] According to Pearry Green, Branham's teaching on the serpent's seed doctrine was viewed by the broader Pentecostal movement as the "filthy doctrine ... that ruined his ministry".
[151] No other mainstream Christian group held a similar view; Branham was widely criticized for spreading the doctrine.
[151] His followers view the doctrine as one of his greatest revelations.
[151]