Muffled
Jesus in me
I believe if God could not do those things and suffer things then He isn't much of a god. Are you going to claim you can do things that God can't do?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Top 10 Reassons Jesus is not God
- Thread starter Muffled
- Start date
I believe if God could not do those things and suffer things then He isn't much of a god. Are you going to claim you can do things that God can't do?
JM2C
CHRISTIAN
We are beyond that argument already about God or if there is God. IOW, we are not debating about the existence of God anymore. Savagewind and I were debating about John 1:1. So, if you read your own statement/opinion here you should be able to understand that you’re making a statement on things you don’t understand.
Here’s why I said, until you fully explain John 1:1 then your argument here is based on opinion only.
That is an opinion
depends on his interpretation of One God…
needs more clarification. Does he believe on the virgin birth?
”not by God's will” is an opinion
JM2C
CHRISTIAN
more opinion
You need to explain John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
I love you!
He did not hear me say that I do not debate The Nature of God.
It is OK for him to have an opinion about an opinion (John 1:1) but it is not alright for me to have an opinion. It is nothing new. Actually it is quite boring.
Muffled
Jesus in me
4. (7. in the video) Jesus's disciples did not teach His divinity.
I believe this is false because Paul definitely teaches it. The other disciples are not theologians and less likely to teach theology but John somehow managed to get the message and does teach it in his letters.
I believe this is false because Paul definitely teaches it. The other disciples are not theologians and less likely to teach theology but John somehow managed to get the message and does teach it in his letters.
Muffled
Jesus in me
I rsppond in a lot of ways but I do enjoy having color in my life. I thought it was great when we got color TV instead of black and white.
Muffled
Jesus in me
He is the same Spirit but usually not debated as much. How that works is best decribed by Jesus in John 14.
SilverOrb
Hermaeus Mora knows
Jesus is the son of God. He is not God himself.
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Aren't you also a son (or daughter) of God as well?
Muffled
Jesus in me
I believe being the Son of God does not exclude Jesus from being God.
This "ex youth pastor" has been obliterated by truth in these videos answering his arguments...
Thank you! When I suggested his post was an opinion, I got a post telling me, in a round about way, to mind my own damn business. Nice etiquette there, non?
Yet, Paul was never a disciple. Nor did he meet Christ. And the first three gospels, according to theologians, which includes me, are more historically based while John is considered a more mythological story as there are clear discrepanies from the first three. And none of the disciples were theologians. These were simple men, laborers mostly, or what we call today blue collar workers.
No. John 1:1 is the writer's opinion. Is it not? Did you think I meant my opinion? No sir, I did not. Did Metis liking that you misunderstood make the misunderstanding understanding? I do not think so.
SIGH. He didn't like that I love him. A shame really.
Jumping to conclusions makes you all look juvenile. By the way, I am female, but you may refer to me as he. I do not care.
No. John 1:1 is the writer's opinion. Is it not? Did you think I meant my opinion? No sir, I did not. Did Metis liking that you misunderstood make the misunderstanding understanding? I do not think so.
Jumping to conclusions makes you all look juvenile. By the way, I am female, but you may refer to me as he. I do not care.
Bolding and underlined is my doing. And I Madame, am I she as well. Who is jumping to conclusions now. And as for John, how do you know that it is the writer's opinion? Is that not your own opinion?
Jumping to conclusions makes you all look juvenile. By the way, I am female, but you may refer to me as he. I do not care.
Bolding and underlined is my doing. And I Madame, am I she as well. Who is jumping to conclusions now. And as for John, how do you know that it is the writer's opinion? Is that not your own opinion?
It is. Women are called sir now fyi. (But maybe only on Castle). I am one who does not believe the Bible is God's own words, so everything in it is the writers' opinions.
Last edited: