• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

TotD: Was the serpent in Genesis Satan?

CDWolfe

Progressive Deist
Thought of the Day (TotD):

Interested to see what the different views are on the Eden story in Genesis and whether you believe that the serpent was Satan, and why/why not...

Me: :no:
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Thought of the Day (TotD):

Interested to see what the different views are on the Eden story in Genesis and whether you believe that the serpent was Satan, and why/why not...

Me: :no:


there was a pretty long thread on this done a few months back if you search.


It is not written in any scripture from that time period nor eluded to that the snake is or ever was satan.
 

Awoon

Well-Known Member
Thought of the Day (TotD):

Interested to see what the different views are on the Eden story in Genesis and whether you believe that the serpent was Satan, and why/why not...

Me: :no:



The serpent is the ongoing conversation you have with yourself.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
No where in the Bible does it state that it was Satan. It is merely assumed by many to be Satan.

I think the connection is stated in a cpl of places in the NT. Only place I know of for sure is in Revelation 20:2
He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.

As far as the OT goes, if you take it all at face value the serpent couldn't possibly be Satan: in Genesis the serpent is condemned to crawl on it's belly. Later in Job we find Satan "going to and fro on the earth, and (from) walking up and down upon it.” Job.1:7 (KJV)
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Here we go again!....oh joy!

The serpent was indeed the adversary, bent on the failure of Man to learn the difference between good and evil.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
Here we go again!....oh joy!

The serpent was indeed the adversary, bent on the failure of Man to learn the difference between good and evil.

That's very. . . . traditional. :D
 

freethinker44

Well-Known Member
It does state in Revelations that Satan was the "serpent of old", so it isn't really a stretch to connect that with the serpent in Genesis. However, this only works if you believe the bible is one book, by one author. If you believe it is a collection of different stories and books, then it is pretty clear that the serpent in Genesis is not Satan.

With that said....

If you are Christian, yes, the serpent is clearly Satan.

If you are not Christian, no, the serpent is clearly not Satan.
 

Awoon

Well-Known Member
The Human thoughts we all have...The Serpent

Nobody wants to beee lieve that. People need Devils and Gods to survive in this horrible place.

AHHHH HA HA HA LOL LOL
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
Genesis 3:1 (KJV)
Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of the tree of the garden?

"beast of the field" doesn't sound like the character that Satan is usually portrayed as.
 

Iti oj

Global warming is real and we need to act
Premium Member
The serpint was not satan but a lucifer. And no lucifer is not satan.
 

gnostic

The Lost One
lti oj said:
The serpint was not satan but a lucifer. And no lucifer is not satan.

Sorry, but where does it say that the serpent is lucifer? Sources, please.

And to answer the OP:

If you speaking about many Christians, then it would be "yes". Some would disagree.

But since the Genesis in Old Testament, is actually one of the scriptures of Judaism (Hebrew Scriptures, Tanakh, Torah), then if you were to ask the Jews, they would say "no".

As for me, and me being agnostic, I would say "no" too. There absolutely no connection between Satan and the serpent in the OT or Hebrew scriptures.

quagmire said:
I think the connection is stated in a cpl of places in the NT. Only place I know of for sure is in Revelation 20:2
He seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.

The thing is, only someone delusional would take anything written any part of Revelation seriously and literally, because it was written by someone who is clearly insane.

How many times have Christians have interpret any passage of Revelation as being "prophetic", only to discovered that their predictions were proven wrong? More than I care to know, that's for sure.
 

Quagmire

Imaginary talking monkey
Staff member
Premium Member
The thing is, only someone delusional would take anything written any part of Revelation seriously and literally, because it was written by someone who is clearly insane.

No that's not actually the thing. That's an irrelevant and off-topic observation.
 

Twig pentagram

High Priest
I agree with those who think the serpent in Genesis doesn't represent
satan, because IMHO the Bible never clearly states that it does.
 
Top