Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
People like stupid posts.People like surgeries.
And surgeon's knives.People like stupid posts.
There are eunuchs in the Bible, but I guess they were used as attendants to queens in prior religions.
Yep, people causally have penectomies done on a whim, just for ****s and giggles.And surgeon's knives.
Or the social environment to accommodate it. Let’s not pretend that there isn’t a social influence at play here.That's a great counter-point.
While you could become a eunuch for a variety of religious reasons, there were historical eunuchs that were likely transgender. They just didn't have the cultural language for it back then that we do now.
I touched on this in another thread, but I cannot take this claim — the idea that gender is not subjective — seriously.
Gender is not this unique identity that doesn’t follow the pattern of other identities, in which we can, on a subjective level, dis-identify or identify. Sure, identities are imposed on us: biologically, socially, etc, but we can then either dis-identify or identify (subjectively) with those imposed identities. At a subjective level, we are dis-identifying and identifying with people and experiences all the time.
I suspect this is a defense response to protect against detransitioners by writing them off as not “true” or “actual” transgender persons, or by further positioning transgender people as victimized and oppressed (by their imposed transgender identity) in order to garner more support. Either way, undermining the situation with un-truths does nobody good in the long run.
Or the social environment to accommodate it. Let’s not pretend that there isn’t a social influence at play here.
Did eunuchs even have a choice in the matter?That's a great counter-point.
While you could become a eunuch for a variety of religious reasons, there were historical eunuchs that were likely transgender. They just didn't have the cultural language for it back then that we do now.
I never understood why people want operations. It's crazy.Yep, people causally have penectomies done on a whim, just for ****s and giggles.
I’m not denying the biological influence. I said biology imposes identities onto us. You are choosing to stop there and deny the subjective element in which we can then choose to dis-identify or identify with these imposed identities.Deny science all you want, I don't care. The science stands. Cope.
I’m not denying the biological influence. I said biology imposes identities onto us. You are choosing to stop there and deny the subjective element in which we can then choose to dis-identify or identify with these imposed identities.
I was being sarcastic.I never understood why people want operations. It's crazy.
This is my experience and where you guys lose me. You deny the subjective ability to dis-identify and identify with experiences and people. I guess it becomes a free-will issue in which you guys are stripping transgender people of agency and free-will. That is not empowering but the opposite in my view.Well, that is not science. That is your ideology.
I am not touching surgeon's knives.I was being sarcastic.
People want surgeries to correct medical conditions. Easy enough to understand, right?
You shouldn't be anyway if you're not a surgeon.I am not touching surgeon's knives.
This is my experience and where you guys lose me. You deny the subjective ability to dis-identify and identify with experiences and people. I guess it becomes a free-will issue in which you guys are stripping transgender people of agency and free-will. That is not empowering but the opposite in my view.
Did eunuchs even have a choice in the matter?
Whether you intended it that way or not this just comes across as a sugar coated version of 'have you tried just not being depressed/autustic/gay/trans/etc?'This is my experience and where you guys lose me. You deny the subjective ability to dis-identify and identify with experiences and people. I guess it becomes a free-will issue in which you guys are stripping transgender people of agency and free-will. That is not empowering but the opposite in my view.
Sounds like you're referring to transvestite males (autogynephiles), who decide to transition later on in life and are usually hetero males. Yeah, there's a lot of those. Not all of them are older, either. Some are younger. To be honest, a lot of younger guys are getting sucked into it because of sissy porn and trans porn, and they develop an obsession with it. Some are chasers with a fetish for trans women and then they transition to be "lesbians" with other fetishists like themselves. My last boyfriend is one of those types, pretending he's trans (among other things) when he's really a self-hating gay man with a ton of fetishes, who became obsessed with tranny porn when he was young. There's a lot of weird **** going on.What shocks me is that in the United States so many heterosexual cisgender people become trans just like that.
This is highly suspicious.
I think that there is a culture that indoctrinates heterosexual cisgender people.
Transformation is the ability to dis-identify with one identity and identify with another. It is essential in the quest for fulfillment in my experience.Well, I accept your view if you can show that we have free will.
But that is the problem. We don't, apparently.
Because if that was the case you could totally freely choose your gender. Nothing stop you, you just change your mind. Do that and actually do that for, say a year.