I believe you have no way to ascertain that. However I can categorically state that I respond with logic not with assumptions. I do respond to other people's assumptions which quite often are not logical or fact based.
I believe it is perfectly logical. What is it that you do not see as logical? You haven't explained your reasoning.
Well, you believe WRONG … AGAIN!
I have
already ascertained that in Post #172. You are just delusional – how can you still say you respond with logic??! Here, let me refresh your memory of how I ascertained that you have
NOT responded with logic and rationale –
‘a good example was your post #163 where you concluded Jesus is God when he said “I and my Father are one” – so how logical is that when 7 chapters later in John 17:20-23, Jesus prayed to God to make his disciples be one as he and God are one which is a direct reference to his words in John 10:30 ! So, was Jesus praying to God to make his disciples Gods too?? So much with you responding "in accordance with reason or logic"!’
I believe you are in error I never said there were separate Gods involved. God operates as the only Spirit in Jesus and He operates as a ruling Spirit in believers when they let Him.
So?? What has that got to do with your theory of trinity???!
God operates as the only Spirit in ALL prophets and He operates as a ruling Spirit
in believers when they let Him – ‘believers’ here is NOT a reference to those who believe Jesus came to die for your sin BUT it’s a reference to those in Jesus’ days who hear and believe in his preaching
AND believe in God who sent him –
“Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes Him who sent me has eternal life” – John 5:24.
You are NOT going to find a single passage in your WHOLE Bible where
Jesus said or even implied that whoever believes he came to die for all man sin has eternal life – go ahead and
prove me wrong!
I believe I can agree that the reasoning is a bit weak on this one.
Yahweh is the God of Heaven.
The Father is in Heaven
The Father is Father by dint of being the creator
The creator is Yahweh
Therefore the Father is God and that is the first member of the Trinity.
You are doing just fine here UNTIL you said God is the first member of the trinity. There’s no such thing as the trinity. According to you, the trinity is a theory, which means it’s not a fact. You yourself referred to the trinity as ‘
the theory of the trinity when you wrote,
“Are you going to deny that the theory of the Trinity has the Father in it?” (see your post #163).
I like this one better:
John 6:27 Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him
God the Father has set his seal.”
Do you even understand the context of John 6:27?? Go ahead and enlighten me with your understanding of John 6:27.. this should be interesting.
I believe that is not so. What I am saying is that which is proven has first been theorized.
What exactly do you believe when you have NOT ‘proven’ anything with logic and rationale other than cherry-picked verses here and there and try to tailor-fit those verses into your false belief??
BTW, you have not answered my question in Post #170, so, let put that again here – “
OK, since you said you ‘do not have to explain the logic unless someone asks for it', I am now asking you to explain your logic (as in your post #159) of how Gen. 24:7 and Matt. 5:16 proved your Trinitarian belief ??”